Wed, Jan 1, 4:26 AM CST

617 Sq 'Special Duties'

Poser Aviation posted on Aug 21, 2011
Open full image in new tab Zoom on image
Close

Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.


Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.

Description


The request for ‘Special Duties’ crews was undoubtedly due to 617 Squadrons low flying expertise. And on the 9th of December, Clayton, ‘Chuffy’ Bull and a new crew led by Canadian Flg Off Gordon Weedon flew down to Tempsford. They were briefed to drop containers of arms and ammunition to French resistance groups near the town of Doullens the following night. The two ‘Special Duties’ units based at Tempsford (No 138 and 161 Squadrons, equipped with Halifax bombers) usually undertook these missions, but were fully committed to similar operations. A lone flak gun near the town’s railway station engaged Weedon,with his aircraft in flames, Weedon attempted to evade further damage but flew into a hill on the edge of town. The six crew in the forward section of the plane died instantly, rear gunner WO Robert Cummings ( an American serving in the RCAF) was found badly injured several hundred yards from the plane, he died the following day. Right on Weedons tail was ‘Chuffy’ Bull, he was engaged by the same flak gun , with a fuel tank on fire he managed to avoid the hill and climb to 800 ft, at which point most of the crew bailed out. However the wireless operator was in the upper turret, helping to look for the drop zone, and he and the rear gunner perished when the aircraft crashed a few miles further on. Clayton was unable to locate the drop zone and returned to Tempsford with his cargo still aboard. On the 20th , accompanied by Ken Brown, Joe McCarthy and Nick Ross, all temporarily attached to 138 Sq, they tried again but faired no better. Dejected the four crews returned to Coningsby. While this was going on 617 Squadron was back flying ‘ops’. A raid to bomb the V1 site at Flixecourt in France on the 16th and an armaments factory at Leige Belgium on the 20th had very poor results. Both attacks were preceded by 'Pathfinders' marking the target, however marking was so poor most aircraft returned with their load intact. Returning from the Leige raid, dams veteran Geoff Rice was attacked by a night-fighter.The aircraft crashed with only Rice able to bail out. He managed to evade the Germans for two months before being captured. A Belgium police report indicated that wireless-operator WO Bruce Gowrie survived the crash but was shot by German soldiers ‘while trying to escape’. Two further operations, to a V1 site in the Pas de Calaise and a return to Flixecourt, suffered from similar poor target marking and again crews were unable to bomb. 1943 closed with 617 Squadron at a low ebb. Since forming 9 months earlier they had lost a C/O, four Flight Leaders and fourteen crews, recent missions had been so poor more bombs were returned than dropped, Cheshire decided something had to be done and done now. He knew what the problem was and he had a solution, he went to see AVM Cochrane. Cheshire explained that the marker flares were being dropped from so high, they either drifted away from the target or were going out before the bombers were in position to see them. He suggested it should be done from ‘very low level' instead. Cochrane felt this was too hazardous and suggested trying from 5,000 ft. Cheshire reluctantly agreed but in turn asked that 617 Squadron be allowed to do it’s own target marking and dispense with the Pathfinders, to which Cochrane agreed. On January 20th, 11 aircraft returned to the V1 site in the Pas de Calaise, most aircraft carried 14 x 1000 lb bombs however 2 of the re-converted ‘Dambusters’ could only carry 11 due to the structural alterations. Arriving over the target, Cheshire dropped marker flares, although, smoke from the flares drifted obscuring the aim point, and this combined with heavy flak, caused several aircraft to make multiple runs before bomb release. The result was a great improvement with substantial damage observed, but it could be better. It was not only Cheshire who was pondering this marking issue, Mick Martin too was giving it serious thought…..

Comments (18)


)

android65mar

7:54AM | Sun, 21 August 2011

Excellent image and fascinating reading, what they wouldn't have done for a bit of stealth technology!

)

T.Rex

9:15AM | Sun, 21 August 2011

... and giving me serious thought, too. I recall reading about htese failures of the pathfinder system in the Lancaster book. And then the inprovement when the low flying bombers made their own pathfinder missions. I can almost suspect what the first sentence on your next post will be, but, I'll let you surprise me! The bravery and tricks the bomber crews were up to - wow! Nice image - gives an image of why low flying was so dangerous - all you needed was to encounter ONE light FLAK gun with a good crew and you were lost. And, high flying meant missing the target.

)

debbielove

10:07AM | Sun, 21 August 2011

Ah now, this marking issue.. I read in 'Britain At War' magazine about this very thing.. (I won't spoil the ending. lol) Go for it 617, the solving of this problem makes the squadron a legend.. Fine work once more Neil.. (Ref: Sea Hawk pics, you still want them?) I'm going to Rosy's tomorrow and can send them today if you want, let me know...) Otherwise I'll send afterwards.. :-) Rob

)

ArtistKimberly

10:11AM | Sun, 21 August 2011

cool seen

)

UVDan

10:49AM | Sun, 21 August 2011

Hooray for the 617th.

)

warder348

10:56AM | Sun, 21 August 2011

These boy's don't ever get any easy missions do they? Tough bunch!! Fine work as usual Neil.

)

bmac62

11:02AM | Sun, 21 August 2011

Let me use that slightly overused word...gripping! I haven't read how the marking problem was solved so I am waiting holding my breath:) And another really well done nighttime render! Way to go Neil.

)

jac204

11:07AM | Sun, 21 August 2011

Great picture and narrative, and I look forward to more on this marking issue.

)

taliesin86001

11:15AM | Sun, 21 August 2011

By this point I'm hooked and have to hear the whole story. Another very fine render Neil.

)

pat40

11:25AM | Sun, 21 August 2011

Fantastic,

)

Froggy

11:42AM | Sun, 21 August 2011

I hadn't realised these elite guys had dismal results more often then not, just like the rest of the airforce - i agree with T.rex on his observations about effective FLAK batteries too - amazingly hazardous stuff, looking forward to tomorrows too!

)

Osper

3:32PM | Sun, 21 August 2011

History will repeat itself no doubt but one learns from ones one mistake! Keep them coming.

)

shamstar

4:19PM | Sun, 21 August 2011

Bad luck there. Excellent as always.

)

preeder

2:55AM | Mon, 22 August 2011

Excellent once again.

)

flavia49

10:26AM | Mon, 22 August 2011

splendid picture! fantastic prose

)

Briney

8:07PM | Mon, 22 August 2011

I guess if I was going to sneak up on someone at night I certainly wouldn't use a lancaster...;-) How did they keep going from day to day in the face of those losses? No alternative???

)

kjer_99

8:55PM | Tue, 23 August 2011

Seems like low-level bombing at night was at least as bad, if not worse, than the daylight bombing raids of the U.S. Like Briney above, I marvel that they could keep getting into those planes and flying their missions. This render is very poignant to me. A bright flare in the dark night and you know a crew is dying.

)

Tryphon

6:44PM | Wed, 21 September 2011

Wow the attrition rate in this squadron was appalling, like many here I too wonder how these men kept it up mission after mission, amazing render Neil!


1 80 0

01
Days
:
19
Hrs
:
33
Mins
:
14
Secs
Premier Release Product
Mountain Trail
2D Graphics
Sale Item
$10.95 USD 40% Off
$6.57 USD

Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.