Mon, Oct 21, 11:27 PM CDT

SFW or NSFW?

2D Pin-ups posted on Oct 01, 2011
Open full image in new tab Zoom on image
Close

Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.


Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.

Description


Hi kids! I haven't posted in a while because I've been busy working on my comic. I need YOUR advice, though! The time has come where I need to make a stand on whether the comic is safe for work (SFW) or not safe for work (NSFW). I don't know where the "line" is on that, though. This image represents just about as spicy as it will ever get. Now, I remember some old Archie mags used to have bikini girls on the covers every summer, but they weren't quite as... mature, although they sometimes did show some cleavage. Is the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue SFW? Is the TV show "Friends" SFW? I don't know. I'm aiming for a "PG-13" level, and I don't even know if THAT is safe or not safe for work. I'm not trying to trick you into reading my webcomic, but if you have, maybe you can answer better. Otherwise, look at this picture, and tell me if it's SFW or NSFW. The result doesn't matter as long as it's categorized correctly! And thanks for your help!

Comments (11)


kbar

6:07PM | Sat, 01 October 2011

sfw

)

Faemike55

8:58PM | Sat, 01 October 2011

I think it is SFW

)

Nightranger

10:32PM | Sat, 01 October 2011

I think it is SFW, although Betty and Veronica were never built like that... in the comic anyway.

)

DangerousThing

4:50AM | Sun, 02 October 2011

I would say tame enough for work.

)

T.Rex

7:23AM | Sun, 02 October 2011

Anything Didi is SFW - one can see far worse on a public (non-nudist!) beach. And I'm not talking Sweden now, I'm talking California and New England. I'll never forget the girl on Huntington Beach with a mini-thong thingy, lying prone, legs spread - her anus clearly visible. Er, non-nude public beach? Anyone have a sling-shot? Archie was OK. Sports Illustrated - well, some of the cover photos were a bit daring. I've never seen "Friends" as I don't have a TV (I regard such as a waste of time), so I can't answer on that one. I've looked at your web site. Looks fine. I enjoyed the new (too tight) jeans for Didi series. But, would also like to see Didi (and friends) in 3D as well. Keep up the good work! :-)

)

Knechtruprecht

10:35AM | Sun, 02 October 2011

It's actually totally in the sfw range. Besides, the images of your comic are generally safer for work than the situations you're creating. ;)

)

MKeyes

12:03PM | Sun, 02 October 2011

Lmbo! Yeah right! I went, I looked, I read, I enjoyed! And this image of Didi is SFW!

)

Revelation-23

12:41PM | Sun, 02 October 2011

I'd say it's SFW. I don't know if I'd want to be anywhere where your comic would be considered NSFW...

)

jocko500

9:55PM | Sun, 02 October 2011

this is safe for sure. cool work

)

kennydodge

1:09PM | Mon, 03 October 2011

TOTALLY SFW. You're closer to "G" than "PG-13"... You'd need the suit to be JUST a bit sheer to earn that "PG-13" rating :)

noFreeLunch

4:46AM | Tue, 04 October 2011

SFW ... BUT ... but I'd better be working pretty hard.


1 260 1

00
Days
:
00
Hrs
:
32
Mins
:
36
Secs
Premier Release Product
DMs Daydreamer
3D Models
Top-Selling Vendor Sale Item
$20.95 USD 50% Off
$10.48 USD

Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.