Fri, Jan 10, 2:37 PM CST

Temple w StainedGlassLight

Imagine 3D (none) posted on Oct 18, 2002
Open full image in new tab Zoom on image
Close

Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.


Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.

Description


Just a little break to explore volume light.I used a model I found on the web because I was playing with light, not modelling this time.Fully textured in Imagine tho,a coupla maps that came with the model,sorry don't remember where I harvested it.If you recognise your model e mail me and I'll add a credit.Figgered out that it takes a VERY BRIGHT LIGHT and no noise with full quality,no falloff,5000 scattering,zero emission,and a very small(in relation to the volume object size)step size.

Comments (7)


digger41

3:49PM | Fri, 18 October 2002

excellent bobby...again

)

Dhurgan

5:15AM | Sat, 19 October 2002

As usual, a good picture, you should go for a parallell light though if its sunlight you try to render, since the light in this picture comes from a point quite near outside the building.

)

bobbystahr

12:53PM | Sat, 19 October 2002

good point man....usually I put the parallell light( which this is in fact,round no falloff)much farther away from the object and WAAAAAY bigger,but as this was just a test with someone elses' object I was a bit slack....maybe it's an explosion in the foyer and it's blowing the doors open....lol...but really..thanx for the input....gonna try it again with an original object and thinner scattering on the vol,and i'll fix that light,heh heh heh

)

M3G

2:44PM | Sat, 19 October 2002

Good effort! I believe a parallel light source needs no sizing if you just pick no shape and point it at the scene you are rendering. That way there is no need to be concerned about distance or whether it is covering the entire scene. Also, shouldn't the light/dark boundaries be softer?

)

bobbystahr

7:10PM | Sat, 19 October 2002

thanx M3G,for some reason I didn't know that,do it on the next test(see above)Ligt/dark boundaries,please explain,do you mean at the edges of the light beams?

kmanktelow

11:07PM | Sat, 19 October 2002

Hi Bobby, I like the lighting, but, agree with the Parallel lighting. I don't know if it's the same in IFW, but in IFA, the Round, and Rectangular, Parallel light sources, must be sized to illuminate the scene properly (I've been caught out a couple of times by that!) Also, you might want to consider a few very low intesity lights, set to blue, to represent the scattered light from the atmosphere. Oh, yes, M3G's comment, can only be about soft edged shadows- and yes, they should be, from a purist point of view. The only time you get knife edged shadows, is when there is no atmosphere to diffuse the light rays.

)

bobbystahr

12:44PM | Sun, 20 October 2002

Hi Kevin,Never had the jam to try soft shadows in a volumetric environment...i may be rendering next year if i do that....lol


0 199 0

01
Days
:
09
Hrs
:
21
Mins
:
19
Secs
Premier Release Product
Mystic Threads for dforce Exquisite Appeal
3D Figure Assets
Top-Selling Vendor Sale Item
$9.85 USD 40% Off
$5.91 USD

Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.