Reaching Out by Octavian
Close
Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.
Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.
Description
Modeling and rendering with c4d, textures and post with Photopaint.
Comments (9)
Darkangels0
Nice work!
squidinc
its very nicely put together but I'm not sure on the depth of field, if you were there taking a photo I don't it'd be as blurred as this, makes it look small
dandavis
Well, squid, dare I disagree with you. I happen to LOVE the dof and don't think that every render has to be viewed as a photograph. I think it's excellent and have rated it as such. Nice work. btw: I really admire the style you've developed for your renderings and have commented on this one against every rule I have established for myself (comment on artists who comment on my work) :-)
linkinpark
I absolutely agree with dandavis...Incredible work,you have a fantastic style!DOF IS WONDERFUL!
mooncat
Very nice work!
LCGuy
Well, I'm gonna disagree with both Squid an Dan. Its not the DOF that makes this good or bad, its the clever and surgical use of small focused areas around the window and the seat below that make this extraordinarily realistic. And, by the way, there are times when everything is a bit blurry to me, but that is a story for another conversation! ;)
celestine_babayaro
Depth of field isn't subject to any firm rules except those of complete subjectivity. However, photography teachers instruct against leaving a foreground out of focus, since that's where the eye goes first. But it's rule broken quite often, especially in the post-Martha Stewart Living world of small DOF on tabletop-still life shots. This does take it a bit far. The eye has to do quite a bit of searching for the hero, despite the visual clue of a receding hallway. The compression probably accounts for the floaty, disassociated feeling in the mid-distance. But what I really do like is the back window. The blow-out is something I haven't seen in any renders before (but I'm a late convert from other fields).
Nod
Well the DOF in theory shouldn't be that visible in a picture taken over a distance like that. Not without some kind of close up attachment at any rate. So I'm with Squidinc. Other than that, it's a really great picture and should be sent to the usual place. :)
TheBeesNees
unfinished.