~Hot Beach Blossom~ by Ken1171_Designs
Close
Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.
Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.
Description
A toon stylized voluptuous redhead relaxing at a sunny beach. The problem with cotton clothing is that it can shrink when washed. Image composed with Stable Diffusion and Paintshop.
Comments (1)
MollyFootman
I have to say I'm amazed at what you're getting from Stable Diffusion although I bet there was quite a bit of work in Paintshop on the hands. What model of SD do you use? I'm thinking I'm using 1.4? Maybe I need to cast about for a more recent build.
Thanks for sharing, Ken. AI artwork is interesting if controversial.
Molly
Ken1171_Designs
Thank you! I have beem shifting between 1.4, 1.5, and 2.0 models quite often these days. I made the image above with 1.5. I am looking into ways to improve hands, and I will be experimenting with it in my next image, with hopes to save on postwork.
On the controversy side, I believe some of it comes from people not believing AI can actually learn a skill/ability, and actually perform it on its own. They claim the AI is "copy & pasting" images from other people, which is plain misinformation mass-spread and amplified in social media. Once enough people repeat these things on the web, at least to them, it somehow becomes "true".
There are lawsuits disputing the data used to train the AIs out there, claiming the data was "stolen". I don't want to be mean, but I think some people skip reading the fine print when they sign up to an online gallery, and then say these things out of whim. For example, I saw some of my images posted at the Renderosity website being used in their advertisement, and that is legal because that was in their TOS when I signed up. Everybody who has signed up to online galleries was supposed to have read the terms of service, so they would understand how this works. Not to mention the "fair use" agreement as well.
Some people mix things up, claiming images created with AI have "stolen" the works of other artists, and I think this is the most common claim. They really believe AI is just copying & pasting stuff straight from the training materials, like making a collage, and then posting links to the lawsuits, as it that would be proving anything. This is not how it works, where the lawsuits are about the training material, not the AI itself. Remember when some people in the past used to believe photographs would "steal their soul"? Yeah, we may laugh on it now, but it was a thing back in the day. People always fear what they don't understand.
I can't wait for the lawsuits to settle, so the disputes and controversies will end. :)