A really good movie is on... (updated) by treemont

Bryce • Realism • posted on Mar 11, 2003

Open full image in new tab Zoom on image

Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.

Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.

Description

here is a more realistic version of my last image thanks a lot to Ornlu for his great suggestions took 3hours to render with premium effects please comment or make a suggestion! "...the brave little ducky is watching. What is going to happen next?!!"

Comments (20)

Kantele

11:12PM | Tue, 11 March 2003

pirkolno, svet vrode poluchilsia dovolno realistichno, no vsia kartina do realisma chutok ne dotiagivaet imho - textura stola vigliadit kak to stranno i cherez chur chisto (i eshe para melkih veshei no ne hochu prevrashatsa v render.ru) :) nu eto vse ne tak uzh i vazhno - eto bolshe delo vkusa i t.d. i t.p . bolshe vsego kstati nravitsa divan - molodets:)

)

Dash101

11:30PM | Tue, 11 March 2003

Aahh nice!! LOVE IT! LOL

)

LindaB

12:06AM | Wed, 12 March 2003

Really great glowing TV effect!

shadowdragonlord

4:54AM | Wed, 12 March 2003

Using other people's art to promote your own is a horrible, pathetic thing to do. Good job doing it, though. Hell, even I clicked.

)

cambert

6:24AM | Wed, 12 March 2003

'Horrible' and 'pathetic' are way overstating the case, and crass words to use in someone else's gallery.
This lighting keeps on getting better treemont; it has so much more atmosphere :-)

treemont

7:22AM | Wed, 12 March 2003

thanks, for the comments. shadowdragonlord: I understand where you coming from, I should have used one of my own pic (and next time i will), but the point of the image is not too "promote" my art, but to test a realistic lighting effect. And talking about "promoting": I could have been promoting the movie, which i love very much :)

)

woodhurst

8:19AM | Wed, 12 March 2003

wow- awesome image! you got the light perfectly, and it IS a good movie thats on. great work.

)

Mel3d

10:06AM | Wed, 12 March 2003

this version is better I like the lightning

)

Incarnadine

11:31AM | Wed, 12 March 2003

Much better, i would still suggest about 25% soft shadow in the light from the screen. In reality each phosphor dot trio is a semispherical light source which in effect creates a massive array source. Thus the shadows should have a slightly blurry edge. Good image so far and I'm looking forward to where it goes.

)

Doublecrash

11:34AM | Wed, 12 March 2003

Way good, treemont! It's improved a lot since the first one I saw. Now you just have to try something to blur a little the edge of the screen... excellent job so far!

MarioG

11:42AM | Wed, 12 March 2003

Oh, great living room atmosphere! Super work!

darkstarhellion

11:49AM | Wed, 12 March 2003

Very nice pic, but the really good movie must be on some other channel, because this one is showing that fat bastard Peter Jackson's miserable, slime-dripping, ham-fisted rape of J. R. R. Tolkien's great work The Lord of the Rings, a crime against humanity for which the afore-mentioned stinking turd-stain of a New Zealander should be drawn, quartered and tossed to a pack of starving hyenas.

treemont

12:27PM | Wed, 12 March 2003

I'm happy that you all liked it. Incarnadine: great tip! I'll look in to it. DC: true, the screen has to be arranged. darkstarhellion: i agree that you can't beat the book, but the movie can't be copared to it. The Lord of the Rings is a work of a lifetime, the movie on the other hand is limited and it is a director's vision. And from CG point of view it's excellent. But once again let's concentrate on the lighting here :)

alvinylaya

1:08PM | Wed, 12 March 2003

Wow, I loved the first one and I even love this more. Great lighting. Yeah soften the shadows more. Maybe add another lightsource to be able to see slightly what's in the pitch black backgtound, maybe a low intensity radial light with 100% soft shadows. I don't think there's anything wrong with using a 2d image. There are no rules that say so here. I think the book was a work of genius but I loved the movie also!!! You did an awesome job here.

)

calum5

1:22PM | Wed, 12 March 2003

THE LIGHTING IS FANTASTIC.The image is brilliant and would be no matter what was on your tv screen.If it was al bundy you probally wouldnt of been scorched a tad?Even though they look simular.I think the brilliant character on your tv shuffles the feelings of jealousy?Didnt the makers do themselves proud.Excellent work treemont..:)

)

catlin_mc

4:19PM | Wed, 12 March 2003

This is so good treemont, you've done an excellent job on this one, it's turned out really well. I think the lighting is now perfect and the perspective is just right. Well done

)

Longrider

6:04PM | Wed, 12 March 2003

Great idea,and cool outcome,I love it.

)

tresamie

11:20PM | Wed, 12 March 2003

Wow, the lighting is getting to be amazing! Hard to believe it only took 3 hours to render.

)

Infra5

6:49AM | Mon, 31 March 2003

ok this is what I think if you look at a tv in the dark you see yes a blured edge but also light sorta glows around the tv as wellnot much but it's there..I realy can't help you out sujetion wise of how to get that look but maby trial and error will do ..Other then that this is very well done.. I realy hope the duck is likeing this movie better then I did:( not to go aginst the grain but I realy thought the 2nd movie wasn't as good as the first one all well maby the 3rd one will make up for the 2nd one :)

)