Fri, Jan 24, 8:34 PM CST

Renderosity Forums / Bryce



Welcome to the Bryce Forum

Forum Moderators: TheBryster

Bryce F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Jan 23 6:01 pm)

[Gallery]     [Tutorials]


THE PLACE FOR ALL THINGS BRYCE - GOT A PROBLEM? YOU'VE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE


Subject: Free Famous Architecture Site?


Odiemanc ( ) posted Wed, 16 April 2003 at 9:46 PM · edited Fri, 24 January 2025 at 8:33 PM

A few months back someone posted a link to a site that had free .3ds models of just about every famous castle, cathedral, or piece of arcnitecture in the world. I just searched all of my bookmarks, and this site for: Architecture, Castle, Free, Model, Monolith, Wonder, download, and maybe a handful of other keywords, but I can't find a link or that post. DOes anyone know where it is? I'm looking for either buckingham palace or Windsor Castle, though I'm not sure which. I'd like to find the differance betweeen the two? I keep thinking each is the residence of the (King) and Queen of England.


Odiemanc ( ) posted Wed, 16 April 2003 at 9:49 PM

ANyone know another term used to describe famous places?


Claymor ( ) posted Wed, 16 April 2003 at 10:01 PM

Landmarks perhaps?


Odiemanc ( ) posted Wed, 16 April 2003 at 10:19 PM

Attached Link: http://www.greatbuildings.com

Building, I think it is this site...I'm checking now! Good guess though, that may have been on the tip of my tongue. brb


Flak ( ) posted Wed, 16 April 2003 at 11:10 PM

It could be the one that AgentSmith was dealing with, but for the life of me, I can't remember what the site was.

Dreams are just nightmares on prozac...
Digital WasteLanD


Odiemanc ( ) posted Thu, 17 April 2003 at 12:05 AM

That was the one I have listed up there, for sure, but I hav'nt found either of the models I'm looking for.


AgentSmith ( ) posted Thu, 17 April 2003 at 1:21 AM

Yeah, Great Buildings is the one we hope to have an agreement with, for offering their models as .3ds. At this point they pretty much offer only .3dmf AgentSmith

Contact Me | Gallery | Freestuff | IMDB Credits | Personal Site
"I want to be what I was when I wanted to be what I am now"


Odiemanc ( ) posted Thu, 17 April 2003 at 2:07 AM

Whats this deals status? They approved the conversion, right? Why isn't this completed? Do we want to add links to our Free Stuff is that all?


kromekat ( ) posted Thu, 17 April 2003 at 3:29 AM

{I'm looking for either buckingham palace or Windsor Castle, though I'm not sure which. I'd like to find the differance betweeen the two? I keep thinking each is the residence of the (King) and Queen of England. } Both are residences yes. Buckingham Palace is in London and is the capitol home, Windsor Castles is obviously in Windsor, and is a weekend camp site! ;)

Adam Benton | www.kromekat.com


Odiemanc ( ) posted Thu, 17 April 2003 at 3:53 AM

Thanks, I've been surfing around looking at Windsor Castle, it is 13 acres! Is Buckingham Palace as large?

Has anyone seen a model of Windsor Palace? Greatbuildings.com doesn't have one.


kromekat ( ) posted Thu, 17 April 2003 at 4:04 AM

Don't know how big Buck Palace is in terms of scale - not as big as Windsor, but still a very large building/plot

Adam Benton | www.kromekat.com


runwolf13 ( ) posted Thu, 17 April 2003 at 8:03 AM

Actually, Buckingham is bigger in terms of royal living space, since the royals are generally "Confined" to the dungeon at Windsor. (And no, the Dungeon is not a dank, musty underground chamber, it's a huge circular moat surrounded structure.) Buckingham is in london proper. (Not The City of London, but the London Metro) Windsor is the "country castle." As such, Buckingham is a bit more constrained by urban development than Windsor. Of course there is Kinsignton Palace, and the massive gardens surrounding it, even though it is also in London Metro. IMHO, Neither Buckingham or Windsor look like castles. Buckingham is a house. A BIG house. Windsor looks more castle/palace like, but is still more House than Fairy Tale. I'm partial to some of the northern castles, such as Endinburg Castle. Now, that's a castle, perched up on a craggy cliff, the city spilling down one side of the hill. But hey, I read to many fantasy novels as a kid. Then there is always the Tower of London, which I think is more castle/palace like than Buckingham. Very cool, and not much of a Tower. Of course, then you can go play on the Tower Bridge... Rats, I thought I'd gotten all that English stuff out of the system on my last visit. (Starts looking through travel brocures)


kromekat ( ) posted Thu, 17 April 2003 at 8:57 AM

Amazing how tourists pay more attention to the Royals than we brits do! ;)

Adam Benton | www.kromekat.com


runwolf13 ( ) posted Thu, 17 April 2003 at 10:09 AM

Truth be known, I didn't give two pence for the royals till 2001. Took the wife to Toronto for a vacation. We were wandering around town, when a nice young canadian army officer asked us to stop. He explained that they were about to fire the howitzers that were in the park, and we needed to stand clear. We waited around, watched them fire, and just thought it was something those crazy canadians did every day. Well, when we finally got through the park, and to the other side of the government building in the middle of the park, there was another Canadian solider who asked us to get in this line. We did, and suddenly we were being given Cake. Amused, we ate the cake and continued on our stroll. When we finished the cake, we discovered that the cake and the gunfire was for the Queen Mum. (This important fact was discovered by reading the engraved inscription on the napkin the cake rested on.) It was her 100th birthday or something. The next year, again without thinking, we were in London on her 101st birthday. We were auctually leaving that day, and I remember when we arrived she was in the hospital getting a blood transfusion or something. Anyway, she's the only royal I've cared about. And to show how much, I think she's dead, but not sure. My fasination has always been with the structures of England and Europe. Oh, and the Middle East. I mean here in America, we don't have that kind of history. I remember walking down the royal mile in Edinburgh (cause I'm not stupid enough to walk UP the royal mile). There were buildings along that walk, in fact the MAJORITY of the buildings of that walk, with corner stones proclaiming they had been built in the 14, 15 and 16 hundreds. Wow. Two hundred years makes a building old in America. I mean, imagine Canterbury! The Cathederal was first Christinized in 598. My god, over 1400 years ago. And the building that was first used, and who's foundation still makes up part of the Cathederal, dates back even farther, to Roman occupation! Nearly two thousand years of history right there. Amazing. Okay, I'm done. I'm getting off the soapbox. Sorry to babble!


kromekat ( ) posted Thu, 17 April 2003 at 10:13 AM

lol! - well I have to agree - the history and architecture is always a pleasure to see and discover - we are very lucky to have a great deal of it scattered throughout the British Isles! I have lost count of all the castles and Roman ruins I have visited through the years, but they always inspire!

Adam Benton | www.kromekat.com


lsstrout ( ) posted Thu, 17 April 2003 at 12:08 PM

Runwolf, there are American Indian ruins in both South and North America that are extremely old. The Hopi go back to 500 AD and the existing Mayan buildings date from 300 - 900 AD. Lin


tresamie ( ) posted Thu, 17 April 2003 at 1:24 PM

A very 'castle'-looking structure is Neuschwanstein, in Bavaria, Germany. It has turrets and walls and gates and all! Tres

Fractals will always amaze me!


runwolf13 ( ) posted Fri, 18 April 2003 at 8:32 AM

Isstrout, I'm VERY aware of the mayan, aztec, hopi, zuni, and other ruins found throught the America's. They are very awe inspiring and very much a part of my personal heritige, and in no way meant to belittle them. However, in the case of Endingburg or Paris or Canterbury... or hundreds of other European cities, these aren't ruins, they are living, breathing, vibrant buildings that are hundreds or thousands of years old. I've heard, but have not yet seen, that parts of Mexico City are like that. Where ancient native american structures are part and parcel of the cityscape. The ruins I've seen have been amazing, no doubt, but the co-existance of antiquity and modern day in parts of Europe is simply unparalleled. Tresamie, I've seen photographs of Neuschwanstein, and it is something to see! I hope to visit in in person someday soon.


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.