Attached Link: http://www.renderotica.com

..at Renderotica in the Adult Graphics Forum. There is nudity in the images, but all is tasteful.

i went looking for actual pix of the real woman, and i think i found the correct person, i have to say it doesn't look much like her.... still i could have the wrong person.. lol I found a few pix... is this her? (her nose doesn't seem crocked in any of the pix) I don't want to ruffle anyones feathers, just curious, cuz i had never heard of her... -SimderZ-

I can vouch for the Playboy cover, as I have it. The other pic looks familiar. I do not want to speak of the lady's age, but the cover photo is from, shall we say, a few years ago. The AMG package would be what she looks like now.

ah, those pix were dated 1994 so perhaps she aged quite a bit, must be all the sunbeds... LOL.. ;)

Momcat, Thanks for the review. DAZ, Try harder.

When I was in college, the National Lampoon published photos of GI Joe and Barbie in some intimate moments together. I wonder if new Barbie dolls come with EULA's specifying how they can be used. The EULA may be the second most obnoxious and vicious child of the computer industry. I pay $40 for for a model, and someone reserves the right to sue me if I use it in a way she deems inappropriate? On the one hand, I have no problem with her wanting that kind of control of her image. On the other, if she wants it, then she shouldn't have consented to be cloned.

Well I just loaded the morphs & got this....surely she shouldn't look this rough!!!

Under default lightimg with the camera going up her nose-- yeah, that looks about right. She's a little bit fish-eyed too-- try upping the camera focus and using some flattering lights. Most models look like hell when they arrive at the studio:)) For that matter, I scare my dogs in the morning Doggone it, give the lady a cup of coffee. Emily

Yeah it's the eyes that are bugging me...i've done a couple more renders since & she's looking a bit better with lighting etc. but it's almost as if the morph dial needs turning down!! I'll put the coffe on ;O)

Hi

Here's my first image with the Clone- she looks pretty good to me and just different enough to be the basis of new characters. I must be out of touch since I had not heard of her before. I did swap eyes with a new set by Gecco? I can understand her being sensitive. Fortunately I have no rude inclinations! :-)
Eric

Keep in mind when looking at Playboy pictures just how much they airbrush the pictures. On their website they'll occasionally screw up and release unedited pictures, then replace them with doctored versions where for example shoulder blades will disappear or be greatly reduced, scars around nipples vanish, wrinkles & fat go "poof", not to mention freckles & birth marks... some of their girls end up about as "real" as Vicky... make that Voluptuous Vicky :)

Attached Link: Anna-Marie

The textures for Anna-Marie are very sensitive to light colors. Whites and greys wash out the texture, while more ivory or gold colors and lightly pink colors work better. The ivory light sets from RDNA work very well with the texture. The link above is to a render I did earlier today using one of the Ivory lights from RDNA. Her eyes are still a bit crossed. I have a hard time with that.

Keep in mind that the digital model will not be exactly like the real person. After all, she is using the Vicky3 mesh as a base. To get an exact shape, you would have scan the person using a full 3-D scanner and build a custom mesh from the scans... as in, the method they use to make "digital clones" for use in the movies (Hollow Man, Matrix Reloaded, and so on). However, if you use this method, then the model won't work with all of the V3 things out there. Anyway, why not go look on her website to see the most recent pictures? It's either: http://www.annamarie.com or http://www.annamariegoddard.com (Or do a search on Google and you'll find her official site.)