Attached Link: http://www.nodemasterproductions.com

Not with that URL it's not, got connection failures on two different browsers

The link works fine for me. It looks good overall, but I personally don't think much of the fading/wave text links.

Kewl Fading Menu!

Hi, looks like a nice site--I'll go back and browse more, but I wanted to let you know that using the new Safari browser, the text links below the image on the left side of the main page do not show up, even when you run the pointer over them. They are clickable, however--when you see the pointer turn into a 'hand' if you click they work fine. And afterwards they show up as I believe they're supposed to (when the pointer is over each one), but at first, they don't show up at all. Using Explorer, they show up properly--no problem :)

I think you should put up a warning that nudity and adult material may be there. Friends 16 year old boy was looking over my shoulder when I hit the gallery of the vicki haveing the dragon sniff. rather embarasing to him not to me. is it a gallery when your selling the images? just a thought, I like the layout just didn't know that I was going into a 'store'. if the info on buying the image is bigger than the image I call it a store, sorry thats me. Your images are really nice, all the links work for me. the scrolling tickertape is a bit 80's and the flashing menu links you have to scroll to see all the items. great work so far, sorry I didn't mean to sound hard, just making sugjestions :)

I like the fading menu, it works with the earthlink shell over IE6. The bright green text on the home page is, um, BRIGHT. I'd recommend a muted pinkish grey (picking up the color bordering the crescents in your logo). It would be light enough to read, and would tie the page together artistically. Carolly

I like the looks of it alot, and the flashing menu, I think that's a unique touch. Looks like alot of time and effort went into it. Good job!

Personally, I wouldn't pay that much for a print unless I know more about how it was being printed and what it was being printed upon. For all I know, I could order an 11 x 17-size picture and you print it out on a cheap inkjet printer on 24-lb paper. You might want to provide a few more details.

I know people don't like to use visible watermarks but the images are really a bit small to see any detail, especially if you're considering purchasing one. I agree with MachineClaw, you need a warning message to cover the gallery.