Thu, Nov 14, 11:23 AM CST

Renderosity Forums / Photoshop



Welcome to the Photoshop Forum

Forum Moderators: Wolfenshire Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon

Photoshop F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 13 3:02 pm)

Our mission is to provide an open community and unique environment where anyone interested in learning more about Adobe Photoshop can share their experience and knowledge, post their work for review and critique by their peers, and learn new techniques while developing the skills that allow each individual to realize their own unique artistic vision. We do not limit this forum to any style of work, and we strongly encourage people of all levels and interests to participate.

Are you up to the challenge??
Sharpen your Photoshop skill with this monthly challenge...

 

Checkout the Renderosity MarketPlace - Your source for digital art content!

 



Subject: Scanning 35mm slide?


vdallas ( ) posted Thu, 24 July 2003 at 5:11 PM ยท edited Thu, 14 November 2024 at 12:01 AM

Does anyone know offhand how high the scan resolution has to be to get a crisp scan off a crisp 35mm color slide. I'm going to print an 8 x 10 inch pic off this. I've tried 400 & 600 scans and both seem pathetic. My scanner goes to 3200, but the file size would be HUGE! How high should I go to get 'darkroom' quality?


Susieqbaby ( ) posted Thu, 24 July 2003 at 8:50 PM

what size is the slide?


SeanE ( ) posted Thu, 24 July 2003 at 10:20 PM

errrmmm...let me guess. The slide size would beeee....no no don't tell me, I can do this. uuummmm...geez this is a hard one....35mm? am I right? :+P I'd say the scan res would have to be as high as possib;e and the magnification as large as possible as well. You could always contact a professional printing firm and ask them...?


Susieqbaby ( ) posted Fri, 25 July 2003 at 9:18 AM

well EXCUSE ME for asking a stupid question, obviously we are not all experts on film slide sizes


retrocity ( ) posted Fri, 25 July 2003 at 9:31 PM

Attached Link: http://www.abstractconcreteworks.com/essays/scanning/scanning.html

Don't apologize Susie, it wasn't a stupid question and Sean "tongue-in-cheek" replies work best with members you know well and understand you're just kidding...

Now Vince, am i correct you want to scan a 35mm slide on an ordinary flatbed scanner? (as opposed to buying the "Transparent Media Adapter" for several hundred dollars...)

You may want to make a "backlighter" to get the detail better. There are a number of cheap ways including a "fluorescent flashlight" and a clear plastic "Tupperware" lid to work as a diffuser.

check out the link for more ideas and limitations...

:)
retrocity


bull57 ( ) posted Fri, 01 August 2003 at 10:37 AM

Another great way to "scan" 35 mm slide when you dont have a slide or negative scanner is using a digital camera! take the inside of a toiletroll put it over your lens, set the camera on macro mood, fut the slide in front of it, a strong light behind it and photograve it, you would be surprised of the quality!, this also works with negatives, as long as you invert them! good luck end sucksess


ibiguana ( ) posted Fri, 08 August 2003 at 8:26 AM

Pacific Images makes a great slide and negative scanner for less than $200.00. It is USB driven. Mine works great! and the resolution is adjustable as well as other settings. You may have to search the website to update the driver. I got mine from Tiger Direct.


Sashe ( ) posted Mon, 11 August 2003 at 11:12 AM

As Sean said.. you will want to scan it at the higest resoulution possible for minimal loss in image quality. For my larger printed works I have had files in the range of 250 - 500 meg as uncomprssed .tiff's. Just to give you an idea.. the 500+ meg ones were for prints in the 20x24 size. These are drum scanned 4x5 negatives/positives. I know it might seem tedius to scan at that high.. but it is needed for good print output. Web ouput can be much smaller.


Sashe ( ) posted Mon, 11 August 2003 at 11:15 AM

Oh.. and your final image size should be around min 22 meg (8x10 @ 300ppi) minimum for a print that size. Though larger will be better quality.


vdallas ( ) posted Tue, 19 August 2003 at 10:11 AM

Thanks everyone for your input. I would have responded sooner, but I've been out of town... and I've been busy building myself a new computer. Fun! I'm going to scan at a very high ppi (at least 1200 ppi) and then I'm going to resize in the scanner. The file will be huge, but I should get the print quality I want.


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.