Forum Moderators: TheBryster
Bryce F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 08 7:02 am)
Less taxing on system resources allowing for larger images. Good for printable resolutions. Image Quality is whatever you set in prefs. I only had to use it a couple times when my system kept choking on a maxed out image. (high res tex,lots of lights & reflection) stuff like that.
___
Ockham's razor- It's that simple
Let me add a couple of disadvantages! When you render to disk, you cut yourself off of the possibilities of ploprendering and spray-rendering. I have 2 versions of an image that I have merged.. they were rendered to disk, and now I desperately wish that I had the possibilities to plop render just a part of that render.... :( Oh, well.. if you're confident that the render will be your FINAL result; then a disk render is OK.. If you want to have the chance to be able to change/add stuff then render normally.
Aye, there is one MAJOR benefit to rendering to disk. It auto-saves the render when it's done! This is handy for me on Bryce 4 at work, I tried it last night, and although my comptuer was off when I got to work, it had at least finished and saved the render! Of course, Bryce's batch process would do that too, but it's kinda silly, all that dragging and dropping... (glares)
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
When you render to disk, are there any benefits or disadvantages? I assume it's faster, because there's no graphical rendering being done on-screen, but does it have better image quality? I'm doing it for the first time right now, and i wasn't sure whether it had any outstanding reasons to or not to use it.