Thu, Feb 20, 2:46 PM CST

Renderosity Forums / Photography



Welcome to the Photography Forum

Forum Moderators: wheatpenny

Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Feb 20 6:43 am)



Subject: 2 Megapixels versus 4 Megapixel


Fillingim ( ) posted Wed, 14 January 2004 at 8:04 AM ยท edited Fri, 16 August 2024 at 3:29 PM

Is there really a substantial difference between a 2 Megapixel and 4 Megapixel cameras output if you are only interested in a 5 X 7 printed image? Fillingim


Raven_427 ( ) posted Wed, 14 January 2004 at 8:25 AM

It depends on the type of pics you take and how much quality you are used to see / want to see. Some people can live quite well with 2MP, some others feel like having not enough with 4. It would be best to take a 4MP-picture and take a close look at the desired size (if you have a good one, use your ink-jet-printer), than downsize it via your picture-editing-software to 2MP, do no postwork and print it again at the same size. Than compare the two pics. If you have a pic with lot's of fine details, you'll notice the difference, but if this still is good enough .. your decision. But keep in mind, that you may take one excellent shot one day and you may want to print it bigger .. ;) Just my 2 ct. :)


Michelle A. ( ) posted Wed, 14 January 2004 at 8:54 AM

file_93099.jpg

From an article "More Is Better" Megapixel Math, A Buyers Guide To Understanding Digital Camera Pixels." May/June 2000 The chart is one I worked up myself using the data from the chart in the article. I hope this helps. Can go into greater detail, with in-depth explanation if you need me to but this chart is pretty self-explanatory. As Raven said it is all personal perception of what makes a decent print, but more is always better.

I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com


Fillingim ( ) posted Wed, 14 January 2004 at 9:09 AM

Wow...Thanks guys!!! Fillingim


Misha883 ( ) posted Wed, 14 January 2004 at 7:21 PM

...and also, do you make prints or view on the computer screen... or always use full frame, or use "digital zoom"?


zhounder ( ) posted Wed, 14 January 2004 at 9:44 PM

Michelle's info is correct to a point. This data is based on an out of the camera image. There are ways to increase size and print quality to an extent. If you think of all columns shifting to the next higher value with about an hours worth of work you can get the idea. There is a limit however, perhaps MAYBE 2 size increases before quality noticeably starts to deteriorate.


Raven_427 ( ) posted Thu, 15 January 2004 at 1:27 AM

Depending on the content of the pic, the visible loss in quality can happen a lot earlier. Remember that you just simulate information, that's not really there (in contrary to analog photography). Just adding that to zhounders true words. Also, keep in mind that there are other important things on a digicam. If the lens is trash, it's of no importance if 2 or 4 megapixels digitize that ... ;)


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.