Sun, Nov 24, 1:44 AM CST

Renderosity Forums / Photography



Welcome to the Photography Forum

Forum Moderators: wheatpenny Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon

Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 13 3:04 pm)



Subject: strange yellow streak?


Misha883 ( ) posted Thu, 04 March 2004 at 8:58 PM ยท edited Fri, 16 August 2024 at 2:21 PM

file_101175.jpg

Anyone ever see anything like this? I need to run some controlled experiments. I can't see any streaking on the negatives (good!). Think it may be the Nikon scanner. (Perhaps) its always the last frame in the negative holder.


Michelle A. ( ) posted Thu, 04 March 2004 at 9:13 PM

Well that sucks, if it's the scanner... do you always get this? If so I would complain to Nikon... almost looks like a chemical stain... like from fixer or developer but since it's a negative scan, obviously it isn't.

I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com


Misha883 ( ) posted Fri, 05 March 2004 at 7:58 AM

Just started noticing it. Since it is (I think) always last frame in the holder, the problem may be light leakage from the next (empty) frame. Nikon gives stern warnings about blocking out empty frames using some particularly inconvenient strips of mylar. This could be why?


Michelle A. ( ) posted Fri, 05 March 2004 at 8:37 AM

I think you do need to do your controlled experiments... although why in the world would you need mylar strips to block out empty frames is beyond me... The Canon scanner I have does not require this and I've never seen anything like this happen to mine...

I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com


Boxx ( ) posted Sat, 06 March 2004 at 2:32 PM

Try scanning without anything in the neg holder. You should end up with white scans. If you dont, then its the scanner. That said, it does look like a processing problem, sometimes you get it on the end of a roll - have you had more than 24 or 36 shots, maybe it's an "extra".


Tedz ( ) posted Sat, 06 March 2004 at 10:31 PM

Aliens!!!!


Misha883 ( ) posted Sun, 07 March 2004 at 9:30 AM

file_101176.jpg

Yup, it seems to really need the adjacent frame non-empty. Must be light leakage from somewhere. The manual warns about this. So, if the manual warns about this, why has it taken me over a year to figure it out? The answer is the 35mm negative carriers on the Nikon Supercoolscan 8000 are REALLY a pain in the butt. It is difficult enough just juggling the two side-by-side strips of film to line up with the little plastic thingies. It is, I'm convinced, impossible to juggle two film strips, plus two mylar masks, and get everything to line up, (without sort of "helping" things with a finger across the image). And no one, not even the high-priced pro labs I've checked with, will trim 35mm to 6 per strip like the Nikon really wants to see. The optics and digitization with the Nikons are wonderful! The ICE dust removal part of the software works great. For $3000US the mechanics are pathetic. Constant fight with the negative carriers. A little plastic door on the front went "sprong" on my second scan. I see now that Nikon has announced the next generation of this scanner. What did they improve? The optics, the digitization, and the ICE software. The price did drop! From the pictures, the mechanics look identical. Seems to use the same film carriers; at $54, the words "cheap plastic" take on an entirely new meaning.


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.