Forum Moderators: Wolfenshire Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon
Photoshop F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 26 6:58 am)
Our mission is to provide an open community and unique environment where anyone interested in learning more about Adobe Photoshop can share their experience and knowledge, post their work for review and critique by their peers, and learn new techniques while developing the skills that allow each individual to realize their own unique artistic vision. We do not limit this forum to any style of work, and we strongly encourage people of all levels and interests to participate.
Checkout the Renderosity MarketPlace - Your source for digital art content!
It is impossible (as are those supersharp partial enlargings they do on CSI), to be honest. The pixels of the image are not only shuffled to get the desired effect, their color and lightness has been altered too. Without any memory of their previous live. Actually, they aren't the pixels they were used to be. Theoretically I think it should be possible to analyze the workings of the filter and reverse them, with every possible setting, if you can find someone who is REALLY good at programming and has a lot of time on his hands. The basis would not be the image but the filter, to reverse the process. But then again, the market is probably way to small for an expensive science project like that.
Not every filter would be reversible, even in theory. If levels or curves have moved two different RGB values into one (as usually happens) then there is no way to undo that, even if you know the exact settings used. Posterise would be another irreversible effect. I strongly suspect that watercolour would be another case where there is just no going back, even in theory.
I have been thinking about it all day. Watercolor is one of those filters in which the result depend on the actual pixelcolors, they get mixed. But different components can result in similar pixel colors, so I guess there is no way to determine how the pixel color was created. So I think RHaseltine is right. Even in theory you are doomed. You will never see that face behind the filter.
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Hi there! i was wondering whether the following is possible: say i have a picture of as person or object. the original creator has applied the watercolour filter & saved the image as a .jpg. is there any way i can use a filter on the jpg to reverse the watercolor filter & get back to the original picture. bear in mind only the watercolour filter has been applied. unknown settings. any info on this will be greatly appreciated Thanks:o) GDV