Forum Moderators: wheatpenny Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon
Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Jan 30 8:47 am)
i'm really torn on this one Michelle. the one thing i love about the color one are those subtle pink swirls in the water. that really adds to the dreaminess i think. i also love the bw. did you notice that face in your image. upper right. can't tell if it's man or woman, but they're wearing glasses. is that your reflection??? i always see shapes and patterns when i look at clouds, trees, water ripples...anything really. just curious if you see it too and wondering if that's you.... beautiful stuff...both of them!
Love them both and they both have good points, but I'm going to go agenised the flow I prefer the B&W, I mean if I was in an art shop/gallery and had to choose between which one to buy, just really love the tones of the B&W. Yep The B&W for sure. Kansas is flat! I will take your word for it, oh well it was only a song!
Has to be colour for me :)
And every one said, 'If we only live,
We too will go to sea in a Sieve,---
To the hills of the Chankly Bore!'
Far and few, far and few, Are the lands where the Jumblies
live;
Their heads are green, and their hands are blue, And they went to
sea in a Sieve.
Edward Lear
http://www.nonsenselit.org/Lear/ns/jumblies.html
I'm gonna stand on the side of LP on this one - I like the B&W version. The mottled blue is really nice on the color version. Very soft, very dreamy as some have pointed out. But I think the leaves and branches don't stand up with it. They seem weak in comparison because of the color - almost intrusive. There is also the form made by the leaves/branches. It's very strong and interesting in itself and as one of my favorite photographers once said, "Form is the enemy of color" (meaning that if something has a strong enough form, color really doesn't add anything to it and if the form is really strong then in many cases color becomes irrelevant). -=>Donald
Yes..... succinctly put Donald. squeeze And it's probably something my photo professor would have said too. :~) I think your explanation really describes perfectly why I'm so drawn to the BW..... The color I like merely for the color, and in looking at it further I see how the colored background competes with the branches.... Please tell..... which photographer did you quote? Thanks to all for taking a peek and giving an opinion..... appreciate it!
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
I think the B&W is great for this crop. The colour one explains more what the shot is about though. If colour I would suggest a larger crop, so a bit more of leaves and surrounding area. are in. Not needed for the B&W. Not sure you understand what I think I said.
"The happiness of a man in this life does not consist in the
absence but in the mastery of his passions."
I understand what you said Doug...... :~)) Not a possibility for a larger crop though.... this is the full frame from the camera. I try to compose in camera as much as possible and limit out of camera cropping to a minimum, so with my images what you see is usually what I saw at the time the image was taken. Sound advice though.... and I do wonder how it would have looked with the entire branch and leaves in the image. But I really like to work my subjects up close.... I often feel that showing the whole of something often feels static, and maybe somewhat boring too.... But that's just me...... :~)
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
Well I do agree with you on composing in camera. This is what I try to do most of time. Also why I miss a lot of good shots when there is some action involved. Tell you one thing though... I do really like images that have sections running out of the frame like what you've done here. To me that is a very artistic way of presenting. LOL @ advice.... Moi? Give advice... I only say things I would do.Renmeber...I'm the hobbyist,you're the pro.
"The happiness of a man in this life does not consist in the
absence but in the mastery of his passions."
I usually go with B&W over color - but, in this case, I "personally" would go with the color version. There is just something very mystical in the blue tones of the colorized version that makes the image "pop" for me, and it is lost in the B&W image [although, I do like both version]. Michelle, as always, you have an amazing "eye" for taking the perfect image BW or Color! Ahhhh, the beauty of art - one image, two version, much viewing enjoyment to all from both photos :] Dee-Marie
I also tend to crop to full frame, in camera so I get full resolution. But you know what absolutely, positively makes no sense to me and drives me crazy? Both 35mm film and most digital cameras have a 2:3 frame format. That works perfectly with 4" x 6" paper. So why do they insist on making inkjet printer paper at either 8"x10" or 8.5"x11", but no 8"x12" which is the perfect size? The only vendor, with paper that I like, that has anything close is Ilford with their 10" x 12" Galerie Premium paper. I can cut 2" off the side and have 8"x12" paper. :/ -=>Donald
Yea ... but that's what I mean. It absolutely makes no sense to me. Most cameras in this country are 35mm format. That's 24mm x 36mm, 2:3 format just like most digital SLRs. That format has been the dominant one for 50 or 60 years at least. Why is it that they apparently can't understand that and make ready-made 8x12 paper and frames?
That said, there are two ready-made frame sizes I find to be good for 8"x12" prints. 14"x18" and 16"x20". The first gives you upto 3 inches for your matte border all the way around the image and the second gives you an even 4 inches.
Still, I think going with a custom frame for 8"x12" gives you the best look.
-=>Donald
blink blink Is that who I think it is? Buying your own matte cutter and doing it on your own is great, and will pay for itself, but only if you can cut a straight line. If you have to cut and re-cut to get it right than it becomes an expensive venture..... one of the crooked people
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
I see we have evolved this thread into matte cutting, they say variety is the spice of life. I can vouch for the Logan matte cutting system, hey if I can cut straight with it anyone can!
I am with you LP - I have been using my Logan [bevel-edged] Cutter for over 15 years and it gives me excellent cuts of mats up to 32 inches [actually, you can even cut larger sizes with a bit of ingenuity] - even a "crooked cutter" can get a straight line with a Logan :]
For little jobs I will still, on occasion, purchase ready-cut mats, but for those special images - I would much rather do it myself on a Logan :)
Dee-Marie
I have what is probably the cheapest matt cutting system Logan made.... think I paid all of $50 for it..... It's obvious I need to upgrade.
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
I'd help but I'm having too much fun visualizing you all wrapped up in the stuff.... ;~)
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
Tedzo - I told'ja you hafta spray yourself down with non-stick cooking spray before you wrap up or this would happen. Now hop outside and see if you can find someone. Ask them if they wouldn't mind peeling you like a grape ... and try not to giggle when they start. :) Misha - :P Yea ... cutting straight should not be a problem with a good matte cutter. It will take care of that. You only need to know where to start cutting and when to stop to get nice, clean cuts.
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com