Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom
Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Dec 23 8:11 am)
Spoiler alert... HOLY COW!!!!! WOW! I'm thinking Softimage or something when I first saw it! Yikes! Old school real world art will never die.
Again, WOW!
G
Message edited on: 01/25/2005 13:20
The GR00VY GH0ULIE!
You are pure, you are snow
We are the useless sluts that they mould
Rock n roll is our epiphany
Culture, alienation, boredom and despair
This is one of the best "oil on canvas" renders that I've ever seen !
Uh....what does "oil on canvas" mean? Is that some sort of a new type of software....or something?
Nice use of the Dystopia blocks in the background. ;)
Coppula eam se non posit acceptera jocularum.
Attached Link: http://www.artcyclopedia.com/history/photorealism.html
If you need more Photorealism paintings to look at, try this link."Why bother? Just take a photograph." Well, I'm a decent painter but I'd sell my soul to be able to paint like that.
Coppula eam se non posit acceptera jocularum.
The White building off to the left with the dome roof looks totally fake, but the rest is amazing.
♠Ω Poser eZine
Ω♠
♠Ω Poser Free Stuff
Ω♠
♠Ω My Homepage Ω♠
www.3rddimensiongraphics.net
I learned to draw by tracing Star Wars and Superman comics as a kid. That never taught me the deftness to paint on canvas like that!! Traced or not it looks bloody amazing!! I still keep thinking Sofimage and Renderman when I see it! Again, my two cents are spent! G
The GR00VY GH0ULIE!
You are pure, you are snow
We are the useless sluts that they mould
Rock n roll is our epiphany
Culture, alienation, boredom and despair
Depth of field is an optical illusion. The blur is smaller than the human eye can resolve when looking at the final image. It's not so incredibly wide-angle, and apart from the window frame there's nothing particularly close to the "camera". Stopped right down, and on a tripod, it doesn't look impossible. And it's hard to tell, but the distant objects don't look quite sharp. Which is something I've done with my camera when there's a little haze.
"It's not so incredibly wide-angle..." Did you note how wide the street and sidewalk are? Yet he gets pretty close to the opposite side. Looks like a very wide-angle to me. My widest lens is 18mm and I'm pretty sure I couldn't fit all that in a shot. "...apart from the window frame there's nothing particularly close to the "camera". " The window frame was my point of reference; it's the key. "Stopped right down, and on a tripod, it doesn't look impossible. And it's hard to tell, but the distant objects don't look quite sharp. Which is something I've done with my camera when there's a little haze." Interesting. I doubt I could get anything like this with any of my lenses. But I'll try next time I visit a city with six-lane streets and 15-foot wide sidewalks. Do you have any tips? What lens/settings did you use?
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Attached Link: http://www.artincontext.org/LISTINGS/IMAGES/FULL/Q/9TQ9SMQL.htm
No cheating - do not scroll or look down below the image until you have made up your mind.