Fri, Jan 24, 1:24 PM CST

Renderosity Forums / Poser - OFFICIAL



Welcome to the Poser - OFFICIAL Forum

Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom

Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Jan 24 1:08 pm)



Subject: poser 6...XP home


Dynamo ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 8:27 AM · edited Tue, 14 January 2025 at 6:26 PM

Does p6 run well with xp home edition? Im running with a 256Mb card and a gig of RAM. I was curious if this would be an acceptable limit or should i stick with Daz Studio?

Message edited on: 09/21/2005 08:28


kuroyume0161 ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 8:38 AM

I use XP Pro exclusively, but it has been mentioned that since SP2, Home and Pro are virtually indistinguishable (same kernel). With that in mind, I'd suspect that P6 will run well. System is up to snuff, so go for it! :)

C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg off.

 -- Bjarne Stroustrup

Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone


Dynamo ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 8:41 AM

Thanks kindly for the information!


wheatpenny ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 8:48 AM
Site Admin

I run p6 on XP Home and have never had any problems.




Jeff

Renderosity Senior Moderator

Hablo español

Ich spreche Deutsch

Je parle français

Mi parolas Esperanton. Ĉu vi?





Indoda ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 10:36 AM

Hi Dynamo, I run XP Home SP2. With 512mb RAM 128mb ATI card. I don't think you would have any problems. Not caused by OS anyway ;)

The important thing is not to stop questioning.
- Albert Einstein

Indoda


Dennis445 ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 1:00 PM

Runs awesome on my computer AMD64 3500+, 768mb ram, 128mb Ati Xpress 200 by the way this is a laptop.


steveshanks ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 1:07 PM

I run Poser on 3 pcs, all with XP home on them, none have as big a video card memory as yours, two ATIs with 128mb and a NVIDIA with 64mb and only one has a gig of ram, one is AMD and they all work without problems.......Steve


quixote ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 2:47 PM

Difference between XP Home and Pro? I just learned this. XP home can't read hard drives bigger than 130gs. Pro can. Does Poser 6 handle memory better than 5 does?

Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hazard
S Mallarmé


kuroyume0161 ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 4:26 PM

I haven't heard about that (and it's not mentioned on the M$ page comparing between Pro and Home - albeit archaic). Originally, multiprocessor/core support did not exist, but Home will support multicores since SP2. Home still doesn't have multilanguage as far as I know. But what would limit the harddrive size for Home? Both Pro and Home can utilize NTFS (the only filesystem worth using, by the way). Can you provide a link (or so) where you read this? Thanks! Robert

C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg off.

 -- Bjarne Stroustrup

Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone


Little_Dragon ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 4:54 PM

Does Poser 6 handle memory better than 5 does? I'm not really sure yet. On the other hand, this month I've rendered several lengthy (450+ frames) animation sequences, and P6 didn't glitch on me once, so perhaps they've finally plugged most of the larger memory leaks.



Dave-So ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 4:55 PM

not sure what happened when i installed xp, but on my 160gig drive, it would not allow one huge partition. I put the OS and all system/driver files etc, anything that link directly in, such as media players, etc .. on a 25gig partition. It then would only allow me a 103gig partition, and have one left at 21gig ... not sure why that happened. XP HOme . But otherwise, Poser runs just fine, and having partitions doesn't pose a problem either.

Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it.
Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound together.
All things connect......Chief Seattle, 1854



quixote ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 4:59 PM

No link. Sorry. I experienced it. I installed a 320g HD last week and we tried for hours with M$ XP home to do a full format without partition on a SATA port. It could only see 130gs. Had I installed the OS and then applied SP2 it might have given me the rest, but then how? and in what sort of shape? We thought of using WD tools to format, but again I didn't trust XP to see it and access it without problem. We finally called the distributor and he said we needed Pro. I already had the os on another computer so I switched them from one to the other. I had never heard of that limitation either before last week.

Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hazard
S Mallarmé


quixote ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 5:02 PM

Thanks LD that's encouraging.

Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hazard
S Mallarmé


kuroyume0161 ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 5:44 PM

Interesting, quixote and Dave-So. Makes me once again glad to only use XP Pro and avoid Home. :) Partitioning might be the only solution for drives over 130GB in Home.

C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg off.

 -- Bjarne Stroustrup

Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone


quixote ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 7:48 PM

Kuroyume, Partitioning, even in Pro and unless you absolutly need a large drive, might not be a bad idea. SATA is more efficient in medium or small size drives and may take up less resources. I do believe that Pro is much better at detecting and fixing problems. Can't say why it is, it just seems that way having worked with both OSs. Q

Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hazard
S Mallarmé


rwilliams ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 7:59 PM · edited Wed, 21 September 2005 at 8:01 PM

I have a desktop and a laptop both running on XP Pro. But I also have a desktop that has an older MSI K7T Turbo motherboard that I use for video files and sound files. The PC is running Windows XP Home edition SP2. The boot drive is a Western Digital 250GB ATA drive. Windows XP Home edition with SP1 had no problem partitioning and formating the drive to its full capacity in one partition. I have heard that Windows XP Home without SP1 is limited to 137GB.

I also have a Seagate 300GB ATA hard drive that I use for storage. It was also partitioned as one large partition, and formated on the Windows XP Home system without using any special software.

If your Windows XP Home does not recognize a large drive, it either does not have SP1 installed, or you have a BIOS conflict.

I hope that helps.
Of course both are formatted using NTFS.

Message edited on: 09/21/2005 20:01

Message edited on: 09/21/2005 20:01


quixote ( ) posted Wed, 21 September 2005 at 8:24 PM

Mine is an early issue of XP. SP1 is installed separately. SP2 was downloaded. No bios conflict. So once you install XP and then add SP1 you have to go back and use repair to get the OS to see the drive or does it just appear? Or did you use Western Digital tools to format the full C drive and then perform the install? BTW: There is no FAT 32 issue here. Q

Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hazard
S Mallarmé


Robo2010 ( ) posted Thu, 22 September 2005 at 1:15 AM

I have 2GB DDram (PC3200's) Duel Channel, WinXP home (SP2) Two HDs (7200Rpm), and no prob here. Ati Radeon 9600xt 128mb. Both HD read fully and partitioned (100%) NTFS Pri 160GB (Maxtor) Sec 80GB (Western Dig) CDrw (Lg) 52x DVDrw (Sony)


aeilkema ( ) posted Thu, 22 September 2005 at 1:24 AM

file_291750.jpg

AMD Athlon XP 2400= (2Ghz), 1Gb Ram, Radeon 9600 Pro 256Mb, XP Home. The gfx card isn't of any influence unless you do use OpenGL and mine works fine by now with P6 OpenGl, freeing the cpu from some stress. These scenes have been made with my setup in P6 with XP Home, so P6 runs without a problem as you can see from them. P6 runs great on my pc, without any problems at all. (I don't have SP2 for XP home installed though, only SP1.)

Artwork and 3DToons items, create the perfect place for you toon and other figures!

http://www.renderosity.com/mod/bcs/index.php?vendor=23722

Due to the childish TOS changes, I'm not allowed to link to my other products outside of Rendo anymore :(

Food for thought.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYZw0dfLmLk


Dynamo ( ) posted Thu, 22 September 2005 at 5:47 PM

Thanks Everyone, great community spirit I have been away from poser for quite a long time and wanted to jump back in. Now.. can nyone point to a site with soem smaple poser animation, i wanted to compare it and Studio to see which meets my individual needs (get me.. all informed consumer =P) Im aching to see what i can do with the new set, i wasnt to keen on Judy and Don, but these models seemto have a stronger backbone of support.


Jules53757 ( ) posted Fri, 23 September 2005 at 2:25 AM

BTW, I don't understand the 130 GB problem. I am using XP home with SR1 and SR2 and I have HDs with 250 and 300 GB for data with only one partition. Never heard about that prob.


Ulli


"Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience!"


quixote ( ) posted Fri, 23 September 2005 at 2:39 AM

Well Jules its rather simple. Some of us have XP home with SP1 on the install disk, some were unwitting Microsoft beta testers and have XP home without SP1 on the install disk. The XP disk utility with SP1 will see a HD greater than 137 GBs and can access and format the disk, the ones released prior to SP1 can't access more than 137gb and therefore can't format the drive untill SP1 is installed. Thus, installing the OS on a HD greater than 137gb with an early XP home setup disk without SP1 might require another utility to format the entire disk. Or a later release of XP home or Pro. Q

Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hazard
S Mallarmé


Dave-So ( ) posted Fri, 23 September 2005 at 5:46 AM

wonder if MS would issue a FREE replacement that would format the large drives. I have the original version without SP1 ... Guess that was a stupid thought, especially with the current state of XP license. Lucky we don't have to pay everytime we reinstall.

Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it.
Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound together.
All things connect......Chief Seattle, 1854



quixote ( ) posted Fri, 23 September 2005 at 4:00 PM

:))) State of the license Dave? The way I see it, most corporate executives these days should be making licences for the state... :)))

Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hazard
S Mallarmé


Dave-So ( ) posted Sat, 24 September 2005 at 2:27 PM

LOL .. I agree with that

Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it.
Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound together.
All things connect......Chief Seattle, 1854



Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.