Forum Moderators: Wolfenshire Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon
Photoshop F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Jan 14 1:57 am)
Our mission is to provide an open community and unique environment where anyone interested in learning more about Adobe Photoshop can share their experience and knowledge, post their work for review and critique by their peers, and learn new techniques while developing the skills that allow each individual to realize their own unique artistic vision. We do not limit this forum to any style of work, and we strongly encourage people of all levels and interests to participate.
Checkout the Renderosity MarketPlace - Your source for digital art content!
do you have the original in photoshop format? if not, you might try a trick that often works for me. save it in photoshop format, then, making sure it now IN that format, go ahead and resize image to 300 making sure that the resample is set to bicubic... you can change the JPEG to the same when you "package" it. this doesn't always work for me... nine out of ten, but when it does, it can be a lifesaver. Lou.
Message edited on: 12/28/2005 07:29
"..... and that was when things got interestiing."
Okay. (I'm using the shorthand "ppi" to mean pixels per inch in what follows) Resolution is only meaningful when you express the pixel dimensions of an image with respect to an intended physical size. So, if I have an image which is 300 pixels square, then if printed at resolution of 300 ppi it will measure 1 inch along each side once printed, but the same image printed at 150 ppi it would measure 2 inches. The image has not changed of course, but the ratio of pixels to inch has and /that/ is the resolution. Upsampling from 72 to 300 ppi for the same expected print size will not produce a good quality image. Not even Photoshop can fix that. I'm not sure about the "I can't draw it again" bit. Why not just re-render at higher pixel dimensions? (Assuming this is an image sourced from Poser). I've probably misunderstood this :(
Hi lunqvist... I think there is a misunderstanding... if you go to the TOP of image size, you ARE changing the actual size of the image, but the option in the lower section, that is pixel density.... took me a few to realise that, back in the stone age. what I recommended was a re-sample.... like I said, SOMETIMES it does work. Lou.
"..... and that was when things got interestiing."
Yeah, an 800x600 image is exactly the same size at 10ppi and 1,200ppi - it's STILL 800x600 pixels when all is said and done. There's absolutely NO chage in quality or size when you just change the resolution, and upsizing the actual document above 10% (in Photoshop alone) will start giving you unwanted artifacts. You might want to invest in something like Genuine Fractals - oddly, there's an article on the fronts page of this website about it - great program, and if you're going to be preparing it for commercial printing you'll need to convert it to CMYK (or the guy requesting the file might do it for you when he gets it - but they tend to ask for it already done). Good luck and congrats on what sounds like a sale! -Lew ;-)
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Hi folks I need to send one of my 3D drawings to anyone in order to print. But I have a problem. I usually save my Poser files in default jpg (72 ppp) but he is requesting me a print quality (psd 300 ppp). I can't draw it again. And of course if I change the resolution from 72 to 300 ppp, the pic has an important lack of quality. There is any process to filter or refine the pic the most possible?
CASETTE
=======
"Poser isn't a SOFTWARE... it's a RELIGION!"