Sun, Feb 9, 5:22 AM CST

Renderosity Forums / Photography



Welcome to the Photography Forum

Forum Moderators: wheatpenny Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon

Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Feb 03 6:38 am)



Subject: IR photography w/C8080


TwoPynts ( ) posted Wed, 22 February 2006 at 1:43 PM · edited Fri, 07 February 2025 at 10:24 PM

file_328679.jpg

My Hoya R72 IR filter arrived in the mail today so I had to run outside my workplace and take a few test shots. These are pretty straightforward image. I shot them using the Night presets on my cam, so I'm sure some fine tuning will produce more pleasing results. There is definitly some vignetting so shooting in RAW is a good way to eliminated that when importing to Photoshop. But these were standard SHQ JPEGs. There is also a slight hotspot in the center...quite common actually from what I've read Anyway, here are the test photos. I had to use a tripod due to the long exposure times. There was a breeze too so some of the branches were moving.

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


TwoPynts ( ) posted Wed, 22 February 2006 at 1:44 PM

Gotta love that "woods effect" on the leaves of the foliage, espcially with those palms! =]

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


Damia ( ) posted Wed, 22 February 2006 at 1:46 PM

Have to admit I know nothing about filters, but these are very cool shots! Love the look of the leaves....looks like snow or blossoms. :) Can't wait to see more of these from you. :)

~Damia~ LeviathanPhotography


Onslow ( ) posted Wed, 22 February 2006 at 1:55 PM

These are really nice - I like the vignette - suppose it depends how it works into a particular composition but looks like something to work with not against to me :)

And every one said, 'If we only live,
We too will go to sea in a Sieve,---
To the hills of the Chankly Bore!'
Far and few, far and few, Are the lands where the Jumblies live;
Their heads are green, and their hands are blue, And they went to sea in a Sieve.

Edward Lear
http://www.nonsenselit.org/Lear/ns/jumblies.html


TwoPynts ( ) posted Wed, 22 February 2006 at 2:27 PM

It should be called a visible light filter, since that is what it is really blocking, but anyway... ;] Richard, I actually already treated these for vinetteing, ...so what you see is a minimized effect.

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


Onslow ( ) posted Wed, 22 February 2006 at 2:35 PM · edited Wed, 22 February 2006 at 2:36 PM

He He right yeah - I must stop the kids getting near the keyboard and typing stupid remarks :D MAS4eva !!!

Message edited on: 02/22/2006 14:36

And every one said, 'If we only live,
We too will go to sea in a Sieve,---
To the hills of the Chankly Bore!'
Far and few, far and few, Are the lands where the Jumblies live;
Their heads are green, and their hands are blue, And they went to sea in a Sieve.

Edward Lear
http://www.nonsenselit.org/Lear/ns/jumblies.html


LostPatrol ( ) posted Wed, 22 February 2006 at 6:00 PM

"He He right yeah - I must stop the kids getting near the keyboard and typing stupid remarks :D" Excellent get out clause, I must remember that one, trouble is they have left home lol Nice results from the new filter. Must admit I have never shot IR real film or otherwise. I was always of the understanding that if your cams sensor cant see IR it cant be done. Which as I understand it rules out most DLSR's except the 20Da and modified ones? Like the 5D disassembly tutorial Anyone care to shed any light on this (no pun intended lol)

The Truth is Out There


MaydaMason ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 3:14 AM

a little council... infrared filter can create a hot spot on the center of image... on your shots is a little bit visible... try differen focal lenght to try to remove it.. btw beautiful tests.. for sure you have wonderful jorneys in your lands :)


Mayda

MaydaPhoto


PeeWee05 ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 6:27 AM

Cool shots! So what is a IR filter and how does it work, excuse me while I'm blonde again!

Rights Come With Responsibilities VAMP'hotography Website VAMP'hotography Blog


TwoPynts ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 8:43 AM

Attached Link: sensitivity comparison

Yes, a bit of a hotspot is created when using an IR filter. It is better on some cams and worse on others. Briefly, an IR filter filters out most of the visible light spectrum and forces the camera to shoot at a longer exposure, capturing data from the IR range fo the spectrum. Digicams have what is called a "hot mirror" that filters out much of the IR light, but some still gets through. Older cameras were much more sensitive to IR light while most of the newer ones have a harder time capturing it. And my cam is supposed to be one of the worst, but you see that it still manages it. ;] The attached link lists cameras and their sensitivity to IR light. The best out of the box are the old Oly C2000/2020, Nikon Coolpics 950, D50, Pentax *ist DS, and Minolta D7. Or you can do what others have done and take apart your camera and replace the hot mirror with a same size piece of optical quality glass or IR filter. You then have a VERY fast dedicated IR camera. There are also companies that will do this for you...for a price. My ultimate dream would be to own the Japanese imported Canon 20Da, but that just isn't doable right now. I hope more IR cameras come out in the not too distant future.

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


MaydaMason ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 9:23 AM

you've reason... my eos350d requires an extremely long exposure time (sometimes is not so cool)... 18-55 objective makes an extremely visible hot spot! with a simple olympusc740 exposure time was very short and without hot spot! my desires about infrared cameras are the sames as you! let us know what you will do :)


Mayda

MaydaPhoto


TwoPynts ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 9:34 AM

file_328680.jpg

Yes, I've been a fan of it ever since the late 80s when used some IR film for the first time. I've done some false IR photos (see above) in my gallery but would love to do the real thing...and do it well. We'll see how it goes! ;]

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


TwoPynts ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 11:18 AM

file_328681.jpg

Here are some more test shots I just too, this time behind my place of work. I refined the process a bit and shot in a more manual mode. The settings were approximately 6 seconds, f/5.6, iso 50, auto whilte balance. These are the unmanipulated colors...not really any color.

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


TwoPynts ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 11:19 AM

file_328682.jpg

Postwork consisted mainly of Autolevels..

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


TwoPynts ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 11:20 AM

file_328683.jpg

...minimizing of the vinetting...

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


TwoPynts ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 11:22 AM

file_328684.jpg

... and sharpening before size reduction. A slight central hotspot is still visible, espcially in 2 and 3, but not overly objectionable. This was probably due to the lense being at full wide angle, though 1 was also but I see no real hotspot.

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


L8RDAZE ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 11:38 AM

Some cool..er.. or is the HOT.. examples! The birds in #12 seem way blown out, but the others seem exposed quite well! I really like the surreal look IR gives images! Hmmm....might be worth giving this a try...use my G6 or Oly as an IR only cam!






TwoPynts ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 11:56 AM

LoL, thanks Joe. As I pointed out, #12 was false IR - taking a regular image and "faking" it. Just trying to illustrate the fact that nothing beats the real thing. ;] Thanks for the feedback. Which Oly do you have?

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


L8RDAZE ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 12:06 PM

Ooops.. sorry for the confusion there! I have an Oly C700 its old 2.1MP...but it still can take some decent shots! Thinking it might be good for some IR experimentation!






TwoPynts ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 12:26 PM

Worth trying anyway...the c2020 had that sensor and it did wonders...though the C700 might have a more restrictive hot mirror. You could always take it apart... ;]

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


LostPatrol ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 3:54 PM

Thanks for your IM Kort. Really liking what I see so far. Busy packing for a trip away, so will check back after the w/e.

The Truth is Out There


azy ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 4:07 PM

I love the sky in 15, 16 Looks like your on to a winner with that filter

Eggiwegs! I would like... to smash them!


TwoPynts ( ) posted Thu, 23 February 2006 at 4:16 PM

file_328685.jpg

Thanks Richard. It needs some tweaking in postwork...but yeah, I'm happy with it so far. I hope to get some more photos this weekend out and about in nature! =]

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


MaydaMason ( ) posted Fri, 24 February 2006 at 12:38 AM

you've played a lot with your new toy :) you've exposed excellently all your shots! what do you think to make some shot with colours? for the hotspot... yes... are lens! maybe you'll see something strange in full telephoto mode...


Mayda

MaydaPhoto


nplus ( ) posted Fri, 24 February 2006 at 4:11 AM

Nice to see you get that filter...I just picked up one as well along with a sony dsc V-3 w/ night shot...even without nightshot, the V-3 and 828/717/707 are very sensitive to IR with little or no hotspot.... My Nikon 5700 also works pretty well but has a little bit more of a hotspot in it.......


TwoPynts ( ) posted Fri, 24 February 2006 at 8:38 AM

I did add a little color to the bottom one. The problem is, the camera reads the image as totally without color through the lense. It is an RGB image, but convert it to greyscale and you see no difference. I will play with false color adjustments soon I'm sure. :) Thanks for the comments

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


Azraelll ( ) posted Mon, 27 February 2006 at 12:00 AM

The water gave #12 away...;) Looks like youre off to a good start. I like the palm shots. :) Why dont you use the method i use to obtain "false-color" IR without the Photoshop fiddling. Two circular polarizers and different color filters or just the two polarizers. I use plastic lenses from a pair of polarized sunglass with a glass CPL filter. This allows me to fit 1 plastic PL lens(cut circular), 1 glass CPL, and 1 glass color filter of my choosing to 1 filter ring attachment. So no vignetting. ;) The polarizers are flush together, rotated until maximum light cutoff occurs. This will give you a Kodak ectachrome ir film look. Red foliage with deep blue skies. I added a red filter to 1 of my 2 "False color" IR pass filters for a different color format. I also take a White-balance measurment with the camera from the leaves with the filter on. Gives me an extra color set Below are test photos i took to inspect what happens to my color channels when i use the filters. I used my plain CPL Ir pass filter(auto whitebalance) and my other CPL IR filter with red addon(auto WB and Custom WB)


Azraelll ( ) posted Mon, 27 February 2006 at 12:03 AM

file_328686.jpg

This shot is with plain CPLx2-autoWB-almost max light cutoff Color channels are- Red channel=Ir light Green channel=Slight IR/visible light mix Blue channel=Visible light


Azraelll ( ) posted Mon, 27 February 2006 at 12:06 AM

file_328687.jpg

This shot is with CPLx2+red filter-Auto WB Color channels are- Red channel=visible light Green channel=slight IR/visible light mix Blue channnel=Ir light


Azraelll ( ) posted Mon, 27 February 2006 at 12:10 AM

file_328688.jpg

This shot is with CPLx2+red filter-Custom WB taken from tree leaves. Color channels are- Red channel=visible light Green channel=Some Ir light Blue channnel=Ir light Other color filters can be used,but i find red the most pleasing/flexible with IR and whitebalance settings....sometimes i use yellow. Hope this research helps you. :)


Azraelll ( ) posted Mon, 27 February 2006 at 12:33 AM

Keep in mind what gets blocked with color filters though. A yellow filter blocks blue, so your skys are gonna be yellow. Skys are either visible light or nothing, which is why they are black in b/w IR photos. So in my false color photos, they are either normal visible blue or red from the red filter(not counting custom WB version, that totally whacks the colors). :)


Azraelll ( ) posted Mon, 27 February 2006 at 12:57 AM

file_328689.jpg

I dont have a test photo like the others...But i located a pic i did with CPLx2 only Custom white balance off the leaves. My cameras default IR color is a magenta type color....we see since i filtered out the red of the leaves with custom WB, Ir light takes over the reds of the vegetaion giving them a magenta color. Color channels are- Red channel=Pure IR (actually "NIR", but that just confuses people, so we'll say "IR" :P) Green channel=Moderate IR/visible mix Blue channel=Heavy IR/visible mix(dont ask me why blue now collects IR/visible instead of just visible) Looks like when i balanced out the red, i somehow unleashed IR light across all three color channels. Go figure.


Azraelll ( ) posted Mon, 27 February 2006 at 1:11 AM

P.s....TwoPynts.... I bought the R72 awhile back thinking of false color IRs also. But my camera(Nikon 8700)couldnt quite pic up visible light through it. So all i got was my magenta IR pics that i would expect from my B+W(#092)IR pass filter(That filter blocks all visible light). No good for FalseColor:( So its either the CPLx2 filters or photoshopping it. Im more of a purist so i chose the CPLx2 so i wont have to alter the colors in programs.


TwoPynts ( ) posted Mon, 27 February 2006 at 8:00 AM

Wow, great set of shots. Thanks for explaining your method. Yeah, the IR filter does only allow the magenta light through to the sensor. I had the B&W preset on accidentally, but shut it off and got the magenta look. Your way sounds (and looks) extremely cool. I really like some of the effects you achieved, esp. in 30 & 32. I'm gonna bookmark this thread so I can look it over more closely when I pick up some more filters. Until then, I guess I better stick to monochrome. ;] Thanks!

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


Azraelll ( ) posted Mon, 27 February 2006 at 6:47 PM · edited Mon, 27 February 2006 at 6:49 PM

file_328690.jpg

Thanks:)How about some more info for your archives? I dont get to see many IR threads. I went with either b-w images or left it magenta or altered the magenta in PS to another color for 3 years before i started experimenting with getting "False-color". ;) Also i used BIC pen ink pens for B-W IR images.....Took out the ink tube from the pen, and applied it smoothly and evenly to the front of a sunglass lens, then i took a lens from a second pair of the same type and side and place it on top of the ink laden lens...sandwiching the ink inbetween the 2 lenses.

I allowed it to dry a few days and it gave me an IR image comparable to a R72 filter.

But i wanted falsecolor, so i started more mad experiments....with 6, regular sunglass lenses, stacked and taped together with black electrical tape. It gave me this.....Up top^^^^:):):)

Message edited on: 02/27/2006 18:48

Message edited on: 02/27/2006 18:49


Azraelll ( ) posted Mon, 27 February 2006 at 6:48 PM · edited Mon, 27 February 2006 at 6:51 PM

file_328691.jpg

This one is 8 lenses instead of 6. Used Nikon 4300 with these shots, before i had 8700.

Message edited on: 02/27/2006 18:51


Azraelll ( ) posted Mon, 27 February 2006 at 7:24 PM

file_328692.jpg

Sorry... my other IR pas filter is a (Biermannand Weber)B+W #093, i said #092(which is more comparable to Hoya R72...#093 blocks out all of the visible spectrum. Cant use it anymore, it was sized for my 4300 and is to small for the 8700. :(


TwoPynts ( ) posted Mon, 27 February 2006 at 7:48 PM

file_328693.jpg

Wow, even more amazing images Mike. You REALLY went through a lot of experimentation, I am quite impressed. I am very thankful you shared all of your methods with me. 36 is just amazing and 37 is so dramatic. I only got one IR photo in this weekend -- it was rainy and cloud most of the time. It started off magenta, but I edited to get what you see here. Gotta run, dinner time! ;]

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


Azraelll ( ) posted Tue, 28 February 2006 at 12:31 AM

Looks great! Like the sepia type color. Good subject, water is always good with IR shots. You can also bump up the aperture and thatll let more IR collect to darken the clear sky parts more, and itll mirror the water out more. Water and glass become opaque in heavy IR and almost mirror like. Ir light penetrates some materials deeper than normal light. Skin, fabrics and other things can become translucent. Tripod, obviously is required, but if you have one on you youre set. Also magenta isnt being let in though the filter, Its the common color most digital cameras seem to display IR as. The only color really getting through is deep, deep red, which is more IR-ish than visible-ish. IR has no color of its own. Id go ahead and add some more contrast in PS, bring out those clouds and distant branches and water ripples. Have fun:)


TwoPynts ( ) posted Tue, 28 February 2006 at 9:46 AM

Thanks for the feedback and for the tips about opening up the aperature. This wasn't a good shot to begin with and I already postworked it to bring out the detail and remove the hotspot and vignetting as much as possible. More contrast and it looses that nice "fluffy" IR feel. ;] I'm looking forward to photographing some people. Getting them to hold still for 6 seconds, that is going to be the hard part, hahah.

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


TwoPynts ( ) posted Tue, 28 February 2006 at 11:07 AM

file_328694.jpg

Here is another test shot taken outside of my office. Postwork was done to even out the tonality and to add a hint of color.

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


Azraelll ( ) posted Thu, 09 March 2006 at 12:59 PM

Looks great! Sorry i didnt respond sooner....was very very ill for a bit.:( Keep at it. :)


TwoPynts ( ) posted Thu, 09 March 2006 at 1:26 PM

That's okay...I hope you are feeling better.

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.