Wed, Dec 25, 11:43 AM CST

Renderosity Forums / Photography



Welcome to the Photography Forum

Forum Moderators: wheatpenny Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon

Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 26 6:56 am)



Subject: Nikon D200 or new glass? Let those who know speak to me!


TomDart ( ) posted Tue, 16 May 2006 at 6:39 PM · edited Thu, 08 August 2024 at 11:57 PM

Doug has a D200..pretty sure about that and has a D70 or used to.  Now, the bug has gotten to me to get this camera. I currently use a D70.  The terrible backorder status of the D200 has kept my buying under control...

The question, for those who know the differences in the D70 and the D200, would you put your cash into the new camera before putting it into new glass and having to put the camera on hold?  Is the D200 worth it?

Except for having a stabilized lens, my small assortment of glass works pretty well for my photography. I am leaning the the camera direction and have some saved up to possibly get one.

Comments?  I have never been a "jump to the newest game" person and can wait..while twitching in my shoes thinking about it.            TomDart.


Valerie-Ducom ( ) posted Tue, 16 May 2006 at 8:15 PM
DJB ( ) posted Tue, 16 May 2006 at 9:51 PM

I only have one word.
YES

"The happiness of a man in this life does not consist in the absence but in the mastery of his passions."



DJB ( ) posted Tue, 16 May 2006 at 9:57 PM

Seriously Tom. This camera is  a classic.
Keep the D70 for a second, and go with the D200.
I keep a regular lens on the D70 for fast candid shots,

Get a fast lens and the D200 with a battery pack, and you will not regret it.
How many times do you go through this world.
Live it up. Points of interest.

  • Outstanding image colours
  • Frame speed is so fast you can get carried away.
  • Best ergonomics I have felt in any camera, besides a D2X
  • Large LCD screen.Every function easily accessed from fingers or from LCD menu
  • Very easy to figure out what is what.
  • Built in flash so you can use remotes .Saves buying more externals.
  • Seals to keep out dust.
  • Strong body
  • List goes on

"The happiness of a man in this life does not consist in the absence but in the mastery of his passions."



TomDart ( ) posted Tue, 16 May 2006 at 10:00 PM

Thanks, Doug.  Yours is a "review" from a trusted user.  Thanks again. Thanks Valou...good links.

Tom.


PeeWee05 ( ) posted Wed, 17 May 2006 at 5:24 AM

I gotta say, what ya using it for to sell prints or just to make bigger prints? If so go ahead, but if all of your albums are still on the PC then get new optics and wait for the backorders and price to come down abit... My 2c...

Rights Come With Responsibilities VAMP'hotography Website VAMP'hotography Blog


TomDart ( ) posted Wed, 17 May 2006 at 7:00 AM

PeeWee,  Sure I have lots of photos on the web and on my hard drives but the ones I like the best get printed.  There are few better ways to share a photo than as a print and that print...well, it tells the tale of how well the image is done(technically) right away.   To see a photo look good on the screen is one thing but in print has at least once made me go right back and try to fix the glitzes that don't come through on the monitor..a lesson learned.   I should be saving cash for picture frames, maybe more than a camera. LOL.

I have no choice but to wait a while..this is not pocket change and other stuff needs to be done first.    Thanks for your 2 cents.               TomDart.


Simon_P ( ) posted Sat, 20 May 2006 at 5:04 PM · edited Sat, 20 May 2006 at 5:06 PM

Ok as you know I am not a Nikon man, but that is pretty irrelevant for the sake of what I am going to say.

 

I have had the same dilemma myself only in my case it is new glass or the EOS 5D, so pretty much the same situation.

 

For me the new glass comes first, firstly because the 5D is a FF sensor camera and will most likely show all the imperfections in lesser glass. Secondly because I am very happy with the 20D and can get prints beyond A3 from it.

Lastly and maybe most importantly I have seen the 5D price slide over the last few months (Almost 1k UKP less than the release price) whilst the glass will most likely maintain its price, so waiting for the glass is not likely to save me many £££.

 

I guess the bottom line is what you want more and what glass it is you want, bearing in mind that better glass will also mean better prints.

 

Simon

 

They wouldn’t have made the cane if you weren’t meant to break the rules


Cynical ( ) posted Sun, 21 May 2006 at 10:54 AM

Tom,

I have to agree with Simon here.  The price of the D200 will come down in time.  Just look at any new camera and a year or so later and look at that same camera and the difference in price from when it came out.  I mean you are getting the same camera, just for less $$$.

Glass is just as important as the camera.  I would invest is some new quality glass for now, and when the price of the D200 is half of what it is today, buy it.  I guess I am more frugal than most, I tend not to purchase something when it is brand new on the market and the price is rather steep.

The Cynical One

I have forced myself to contradict myself in order to avoid conforming to my own taste.  -Marcel Duchamp 


cynlee ( ) posted Sun, 21 May 2006 at 11:22 AM

good to know.. will soon be on the prowl for a DSLR myself.. haven't decided which yet.. :~/


CDBrugg ( ) posted Mon, 22 May 2006 at 6:03 AM

If I might contribute my 1.5cents worth:

  1. The D200 is clearly the better camera especially because of
    (i) the bigger+better sensor
    (ii) the weatherisation
    (iii)  the much improved auto-focus.

What is more, as mentioned above, the D200 will surely become substatially cheaper in the next few months as:
(i) other companies bring out models with the same 10MP sensor - Pentax and surely Sony?
(ii) Nikon brings out a replacement for the D70/D70s that surely will also use the same Sony-made 10MP sensor that shoulod become the industry standard, as the 6MP sensor in the D70 was until now (except for Can*n of course). My guess is that a D70s replacement will be anounced at Photokina (late summer).

Therefor, you must ask yourself to what extent you really NEED a better camera than your D70? IMHO, the 6MPs are perfectly adequate for amateur use, for RR & for prints up to A4 at least.
I would therefore go for the new glass (according to your needs/desires but I would only buy the really good+expensive models so that you will be able to go on using them with your better camera when you do trade up.

Sorry for going on at such length (professional disease I'm afraid)

Yours,

Charles

Charles


TomDart ( ) posted Mon, 22 May 2006 at 6:58 AM

Charles, your post is not too long at all.  Thanks for the input.

 


Zacko ( ) posted Tue, 23 May 2006 at 1:21 AM

I haven´t owned a DSLR prior to the Nikon D200 i have now...but i can tell you one thing though....OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH!!!! That´s how much i love that camera! The speed is just phenomenal to mention one thing. 😄

How come we say 'It's colder than hell outside' when isn't it realistically always colder than hell since hell is supposed to be fire and brimstone?
____________________

Andreas

Mystic Pic


danob ( ) posted Sat, 27 May 2006 at 9:21 AM

Well having just moved up to the 5D and found that hard to get hold of will add my 2 cents I would wait until you have got the best glass you can afford first if your lenses are top notch ok go for it if not there is more of a difference in lens quality than camera change The price will fall soon and the competition twixt Nikon and Canon is just good news for all of us..

Danny O'Byrne  http://www.digitalartzone.co.uk/

"All the technique in the world doesn't compensate for the inability to notice" Eliott Erwitt


Onslow ( ) posted Sat, 27 May 2006 at 11:34 AM · edited Sat, 27 May 2006 at 11:40 AM

I'd say with all the new dslr's being launched at the moment competition is really hotting up and it is not limited to Nikon v Canon either ! 

Nikon really need to get their supply problems sorted it was the major factor in me not going with a Nikon brand DSLR when I made a purchasing decision recently.

Hopefully the increased competition from: Pentax, Sony, Olympus, Fuji and the others, will shake up Canon too.

So many new cams announced or about to be announced at the moment.

And every one said, 'If we only live,
We too will go to sea in a Sieve,---
To the hills of the Chankly Bore!'
Far and few, far and few, Are the lands where the Jumblies live;
Their heads are green, and their hands are blue, And they went to sea in a Sieve.

Edward Lear
http://www.nonsenselit.org/Lear/ns/jumblies.html


TomDart ( ) posted Sat, 27 May 2006 at 11:49 AM

Well, for the moment I certainly cannot afford both better glass and a new camera.   I have been looking at glass and seeing what is tempting. Unfortunately, I am leaning in the direction of something like the Nikon 70-200 F/2.8 ED-IF AF-S VR Lens, expensive pro level lens or perhaps the VR kit lens(18-200?) sometimes supplied with the D200.    I like the idea of the small size of the 18-200 and the wider angle allowed..even if build is not up to pro level the lens has good ratings overall in performance.   Big diffrence in price and some aperture is sacrificed with the smaller lens.    For me, somethng like the 70-200 could very likely be overkill, at least now in my stage of photography and less useful overall when carrying one camera body.  A wider lens is essential for many shots and easier to maneuver.  Oh well...wait and see what happens with the markets..sigh.


Simon_P ( ) posted Sat, 27 May 2006 at 12:32 PM

Well I have no idea about the Nikon glass, but from my experience most compact lenses with a large zoom range don’t perform as well optically as lenses with a lesser range. That is generally reflected in the price difference.

 

IS (VR Nikon) is at its most useful at longer focal lengths for obvious reasons, On the Canon lenses the there are two types of IS one is to reduce camera shake and one is to reduce panning blur, the higher spec lenses have both modes whilst some lenses don’t have the panning mode, I suspect that Nikon have a similar difference. (Speculation)

 

As you say though, a 70-200mm lens is somewhat limited in its versatility; I know that my 70-200mm was used less than any other lens in my kit.

 

They wouldn’t have made the cane if you weren’t meant to break the rules


DJB ( ) posted Sat, 27 May 2006 at 12:50 PM

I for one am having a blast with my AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G IF-E.
I use it in a brad variety of photos. Yes even some candid portraits.
It makes photography fun.

"The happiness of a man in this life does not consist in the absence but in the mastery of his passions."



Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.