Attached Link: http://www.drunkduck.com/MOSH_Cover_Poll/

http://www.drunkduck.com/MOSH_Cover_Poll/

I had difficulties with all of them. the stuff I noticed was lack of anti-aliasing, lack of proper shadows, lack of dramatic lighting, weak facial expressions, tape over boobs (is it porno?), etc. not that I object to porno, but ya gotta approach porno pubs different than how ya approach the mass market it's entirely irrelevant that I don't like that 3D character (if it's "girl"), but most main-stream and porno publishers might be familiar enuff with the comic book work of the creator of the cartoon girl upon whom that 3D character is based (dany) to reject the covers, due to copyright/trade- dress considerations. even if they're legally wrong in assuming there are any violations, mind you. they'll go with their gut reaction, not with whatever legal argument that guy used when he created the 3D version of the dany cartoon girl. what was that guy's name who created the 3D character? gil something? I don't even recall.

The shots are anti-aliased at proper size. The skewing of the browser creates the anti-aliasing problem. The character is OK to use. Thx. for the feedback. JG