Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom
Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Jan 21 1:30 pm)
"Why..if the law were simple and obvious, we wouldn't NEED lawyers, would we ?? :("
You got it. Lawyers are only needed because other lawyers exist.
You need a plumber when your pipes go bad; you need a doctor when your
body gets sick; you need a mechanic when your car fails; you need a programmer
when you want to do something new with your computer. Other professions
serve actual and useful purposes, but the ONLY time you need a lawyer
is when some other lawyer is coming after you.
It's a self-sustaining profession.
My python page
My ShareCG freebies
Attached Link: Patent trolls
Hopefully this will put lowlifes like Acacia out of business.My visual indexes of Poser
content are at http://www.sharecg.com/pf/rgagnon
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
A couple of weeks ago, in a case titled KSR International vs Teleflex,
the Supreme Court ordered the Patent Office to start enforcing the
actual laws as written, and to quit granting patents for "obvious"
techniques like Amazon's one-click ordering.
According to some articles, this was "shocking" to patent attorneys.
I guess so ... they've been accustomed to making millions off nonsense.
Actually it is shocking, and cause for celebration, when any part of
our court system takes a step that makes life harder for thieves
and a little easier for honest folks. Usually the deck is stacked
in favor of the thieves.
I wonder if this decision will make life a little easier for one of our
friends here, who has been suffering the slings and arrows of
a frivolous patent claim on an "obvious" technique?
Here's the decision itself:
[
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/06pdf/04-1350.pdf](http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/06pdf/04-1350.pdf)
My python page
My ShareCG freebies