Forum Moderators: wheatpenny Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon
Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 26 6:56 am)
Attached Link: Panasonic DMC-FZ50S
I'm leaning towards this one: Panasonic DMC-FZ50S ... any thoughts or opinions?I have been a huge fan of olympus over the years and have always been impressed with the camera's. If I was looking for a new point and shoot camera this would be the model I went with.
http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/product.asp?product=1289
My only reccomendation overall would be to stick with a company that makes camera's example (canon, olympus, nikon) I left fuji off the list as I was not really impressed with their point and shoot cameras. Hope this helps.
I agree as much as sticking with Canon. Olympus or Nikon
[ Canon PowerShot S3 IS
](http://dpr-cnet.com.com/digital-cameras/canon-powershot-s3-is/4014-6501_9-31740582.html?tag=pdtl-list) There is a newer model..but I can't find a price on it..
www.bclaytonphoto.com
bclaytonphoto
on Facebook
Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations
Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations
Attached Link: Canon G7
Here is another thought. The FZ50 is very SLR like in size. If you want something smaller, then I think the G7 would be a good choice. Onslow (Richard -- see link) just got one as replacement for his stolen G6 and the results are quite impressive. Having read about it at dpreview.com, it is a solid all round performer. I have seen it on Amazon for around $450. Nikon has releases the P5000 and it seems like a super camera too. Both have outstanding macro abilities. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong7/ http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikonP5000/ http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympussp550uz/ http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicfz50/Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations
Thanks so much to all of you for the terrific information and advice. I think rather than the Panasonic, I'll go with the Canon Powershot G7 or the Olympus SP-550UZ as there's no denying the macro capabilites of the Canon after seeing the shot from Onslow. Of those two, which do you think would be best for macro shots? They both cost the same but the Olympus is less megapixels but a higher zoom than the Canon. Being a complete dummy at this stuff, I'm not sure which would be better for close range shots & macros. I do like the more compact size of the Canon, though... but that's really not an issue as long as I get the best shot possible.
Thank you again! You guys are great! :D
Brandi
I would head down to your local circuit city or best buy and check them out for yourself. see which one feels good in your hand and works the best for you. I'm not a huge techie but one thing I have read is that high mega pixels + small sensor = increased noise. Also compare which model has the shortest focusing distance also as you want to shoot macro shots.
I have attached a 100% crop from the canon so you can compare with above - click on it to see full size image. Keep in mind also this has not had any postwork done to it - and it is saved at 55% quality because it from a 4mp original and I had to get it down to 200K for here.
If close up photography is going to be the main use having a large zoom lens won't help you in fact it will mean lower the quality.
And every one said, 'If we only live,
We too will go to sea in a Sieve,---
To the hills of the Chankly Bore!'
Far and few, far and few, Are the lands where the Jumblies
live;
Their heads are green, and their hands are blue, And they went to
sea in a Sieve.
Edward Lear
http://www.nonsenselit.org/Lear/ns/jumblies.html
Ditto all above - hold it in your hands. Tech specs may look great, but the second you hold it you might have doubts or even hate the feel.
My only advice as far as brand is stick with a major camera manufacturer. Canon, Nikon, Pentax, Olympus. Steer clear of the Samsungs, Sharps, Fischers, etc. Even Fuji or Kodak - they're good for fun, but not if you want to take your photography seriously.
A little sideways question... Are you specifically intent on buying "new"? You can get many a good SLR used at KEH.com or "like" places.
This is something I keep forgetting to mention in previous threads, but there are plenty of "only slightly used" professional or prosumer cameras out there. You could get a used Oly E-20 for $400 (of course, I AM talking about a 5MP camera, but MANY a magazine covershot have been taken with 5-6MP cams).
Just something to keep in mind. Good luck-
-Lew ;-)
Actually, I'll take the Fuji comment back - I actually love their DSLRs (I was only thinking of the P&S cams). Their P&S cams however are slow on the draw compared to their DSLRs which is why I put them on my "steer clear" list.
Now that Kodak has dropped their DSLR line (their 14MP cam was awesome!) I've lumped them into the P&S only category - I've got one of theirs, but don't use it for serious stuff.
Basically, that's the explaination of my nonsensical comment - you need fast response for serious photography - otherwise the Dragonfly has moved out of the shot and you don't realize it until you get the image up on your LCD. Good cams or not in "general" there are things you'll want it to do that prety much MOST P&S cams can't do - even expensive ones.
I've got the Nikon 5700 - around $600 when I got it - and it's slow on the draw compared to EVERY SLR or DSLR I've ever had - you miss the action.
The only manufacturer that I see right now that has gone to a LOT of trouble to make their "you cannot replace the lens" (the hybrid type of SLR that is basically a jacked-up P&S - like my 5700) cams have the full response and pro-SLR handling capabilities is Olympus.
Make sense?
-Lew ;-)
LEAVE THE PANASONIC ALONE, the noise is high and trust me you are going to regret not being able to get a dedicated Macro lens.
I would say for price and accessories and lenses Canon and Sony are good choices. Entry level DSLRs that is.
www.dpreview.com is a great site to read.
Rights Come With Responsibilities VAMP'hotography Website VAMP'hotography Blog
Congrats Brandi! Enjoy your new camera and let us know when you start posting images you shot with us and share any impressions you have about it with us. :) @ Lew, I think you meant that Kodak was dropping their LOW END digicams, not their DSLRs and higher end cameras. Also, for a point and shoot, the FinePix F31 fd is one of the VERY few current point and shoots that has usable high ISO functionality. http://www.dpreview.com/articles/compactcamerahighiso/page3.asp
Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations
I just bought the Sony A100K, 10.2 MP with the 18-75 mm sony lens but went with the TAMRON 70-300mm lens also. Just waiting for it to get here so I can try it out. Pretty impressed by all the reviews I have read and went to the store and played with all the comparable cameras and was most impressed by the Sony. I do mainly everything full manual but was very impressed by the turn-up speed and the auto-focus speed. Very fast. And I like the stabilization being in the body rather than the lenses. Now we will have to see if it lives up to the hype!
They seem to be focusing on upper end P&S to prosumer quality EVFs.
While their digicams are nice - even the EasyShare I have has a beautiful Schneider lens - they have a sluggish response time - and that's more of what I was getting at - as well as most off-brand cameras were what we saw coming in most for repairs. A good portion of the camera buying goal is to be actually "shooting" with your camera, not waiting while it's at another trip to the shop.
While Canon has come really close to having their EVF's (as well as their non-replaceable-lens SLRs) respond almost as fast as their SLRs, the top contender is still Olympus - it really is hats-off to them. Starting with their IS line in the mid-90's they've made that type of system every bit as reliable.
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
I'm not a photographer, by any means... but I am looking to improve and learn some things. I'm wondering if anyone can recommend a good digital camera in the $500 range... hopefully with good zoom settings as well as micro (or is it macro? lol - for small subjects, ie insects, etc.) capabilities. Any brands to avoid? Any brands tried and true?
I'm completely clueless about these things and would hate to spend that much money on a 'dud'... like last time. sigh I just need something with good clarity and the ability to really capture textures on both large and small objects, basically.
Thanks,
Brandi