Forum Moderators: wheatpenny, Deenamic Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon
Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 01 10:53 pm)
My husband has one of these and is using it right now, and he loves it. He has scanned in all of our slides from when our kids were little and it is great to have them as digiatal pictures. He bought it on amazon.com and it is called a Digital Duplicator made by Opteka. His came with a 52 mm thread and an adapter that adapts to a 67 mm. He can use it with both his Nikon D80 and his Cannon A Series with a 52 mm Cannon Adapter.
If you have any additonal questions, feel free to ask.
Yes I have a set of Bellows and this has a slide adapter for it I can produce some superb results with that but as yet can only do this on my Canon F and A1 film cameras I am looking for a EOS adapter for it... Though I would imagine it would not be hard to make such a device to copy slides in the same way.. The main advantage over scanning is the speed.. And the quality seems better.. If the slides are faded you may have to use Photoshop to restore them..
Danny O'Byrne http://www.digitalartzone.co.uk/
"All the technique in the world doesn't compensate for the inability to notice" Eliott Erwitt
Attached Link: Pacific Image Prime Film 1800u 35mm Film Scanner $79
Another way to use a 35mm film scanner ... on sale $80Quoting from the adorama.com listing ...
The PrimeFilm 1800 series captures such excellent image detail from
both positive slides and negative filmstrips, you can retouch any image
exactly the way you want it.
The PrimeFilm 1800 series captures 1800 dots per inch(dpi) giving you
3 times the resolution of the average desktop scanner. For graphics
professionals, this means that you can enlarge images to approx.
20 cm x 13 cm (7.8" x 5.1") and still maintain the 1:1 300 dpi resolution
sufficient for color separation and offset printing.
--
Martin
Attached Link: Nikon slide copier user comments
@Tom... Yes, Nikon does make a PB6 slider copier adapter system. I have not used it myself but according to other users at the link, many have found that scanning produces better results.In youth, we learn....with age, we understand.
Photographing a photograph(or transparency, or begative) will make the contrast higher, saturation higher, and you'll lose details in the highlights and deep shadows. I used to do a lot of copywork - not with the kind that attaches as a long lens you backlight, but the results are similar.
You can compensate for this by using a higher ISO. I realize this doesn't sound like good advice (grain, etc.) but by lowering the contrast you'll save more of your highlights and shadows.
Sadly, the tedious scanning of each slide will give you better results - time consuming, but much better.
Good luck-
-Lew ;-)
If you are a do-it-yourself'er, put your work gloves on and start building...
http://patenteux.com/SlideDuplication/
or
http://www.philjern.net/DUPER/index.html
Matt
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Tonight with friends one told me he had copied slides to camera with an attachment to the lens. This was like a "backlit slide viewer" but attached to the camera lens. Do you know of such a device and how well it works?
I have a decent scanner and believe me, even with the scanner doing a good job trying to copy slides is a pain. I have old slides from my deceased father and some are losing quality over the years. Any suggestions?
Thanks. TomDart.