Thu, Nov 14, 10:30 PM CST

Renderosity Forums / Vue



Welcome to the Vue Forum

Forum Moderators: wheatpenny, TheBryster

Vue F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Oct 26 8:50 am)



Subject: Has anyone seen anything strange with the new 39290 build?


Darboshanski ( ) posted Thu, 05 February 2009 at 2:59 PM · edited Thu, 14 November 2024 at 10:29 PM

I haven't installed it yet hoping to see some more feedback about it. But those that have installed the newest build have you experienced anything odd?

Thanks, now I will cruise over to the Corn3d forums and have a look see about this.

My Facebook Page


FrankT ( ) posted Thu, 05 February 2009 at 3:11 PM

Can't say as I've noticed anything unusual.  Seems to be working fine for me

My Freebies
Buy stuff on RedBubble


Rutra ( ) posted Thu, 05 February 2009 at 3:17 PM

I didn't install it yet, didn't feel the need as the previous build is very stable and there's no relevant fixes for me in the new one.


gillbrooks ( ) posted Thu, 05 February 2009 at 4:47 PM

I've noticed something strange but not sure if it was this build or earlier (only noticed because I've been busy creating mats and it affected one of them)

Any material with the scale set to 1.00 comes in at 1.09 - even the basic Flat Grey.  BUT only if I have the scene set to Imperial units.  If I revert back to Metric (grunt - old fart like me prefers old money) the scale is correct at 1.00.   However, if I'm using Imperial and reset the scale to 1.00 and save it - it's still ok when I load that mat.  SO saving in this build keeps it but loading mats made in earlier builds or older versions, it gets messed up.

I've already raised a ticket on this.

Gill

       


thefixer ( ) posted Fri, 06 February 2009 at 2:40 AM

Not installed it, I don't intend installing any update until they send the one with the HULK issue fixed, apart from that issue I'm not having any problems with it.

Injustice will be avenged.
Cofiwch Dryweryn.


lightning2911 ( ) posted Fri, 06 February 2009 at 3:05 AM

as it says the update is still in beta i wont touch it until its final!


estherau ( ) posted Fri, 06 February 2009 at 7:05 AM

 lightning2911 - that could actually be a year or more away.
Love esther

MY ONLINE COMIC IS NOW LIVE

I aim to update it about once a month.  Oh, and it's free!


Forget_the_Rest ( ) posted Fri, 06 February 2009 at 3:12 PM

Apparently there's a bug with the Mac version that's breaking TIFF & PSD support



GaryMiller ( ) posted Fri, 06 February 2009 at 6:52 PM

I've not noticed anything unusual


Rutra ( ) posted Sat, 07 February 2009 at 3:41 AM

Quote - "lightning2911 - that could actually be a year or more away."

Esther, may I ask why you say that? Since Vue7 was released (in November 4th), this is the 3rd update already. The first two releases are not in beta anymore, according to the statement in their site. So, this means that each release only stays in beta for aproximately one month.


bruno021 ( ) posted Sat, 07 February 2009 at 5:14 AM · edited Sat, 07 February 2009 at 5:15 AM

Tiff output is also broken for the PC, but this is the only glitch I've noticed. Havn't updated rendercows yet, so I don't know about this "touchy" aspect of Vue.
And, yes, Esther, I really don't know where this comes from, besides frustration?



gillbrooks ( ) posted Sat, 07 February 2009 at 5:36 AM

We've (sort of) figured out the material scale problem.

Lee Randall also had his display units set to imperial but the scale was right on loaded materials.

I did some changing around - my internal unit was set to Yards, that's when it was making the scale 1.09. 
If I set it to Feet then the scale comes in at 3.28
Set to Inches then it's 39.37

Having the internal unit set to Imperial screws it up and it seems Vue then converts thing sto metric (on the assumption of there being 39.37 inches to 1 metre). 
I set it to Metrres but left the Display Unit at Imperial and now it does'nt change the material scale.

I still can't say if this is happening in just the lates build or if it happened in earlier builds - I only just noticed it......

Gill

       


Rutra ( ) posted Sat, 07 February 2009 at 5:42 AM

OT: Having known only the metric system all my life, I must say I'm always amazed how so many people would rather use yards, feet and inches and its complicated conversions, instead of a so easy decimal system, where you just have to move a decimal point to make a conversion... 😄


bruno021 ( ) posted Sat, 07 February 2009 at 5:51 AM

Couldn't agree more, Artur, but some (like half of the world) were born in the imperial system...



Rutra ( ) posted Sat, 07 February 2009 at 5:59 AM

OT: I investigated a bit now and found that UK officially made the transition to the metric system in 1995. The other commonwealth countries also officially changed. USA is the only country that still officially uses the imperial system (or "US costumary units", as it's officially called there). That's interesting!
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Imperial-units


gillbrooks ( ) posted Sat, 07 February 2009 at 6:07 AM · edited Sat, 07 February 2009 at 6:08 AM

Well Artur, I'm an old fart!  When I went to school it was always feet and inches.
We also worked in pints and gallons, not litres.
I even look at the Farenheit side of my thermometer, not Centigrade.
Our money changed over from Pounds, Shillings and Pence when I was about 9 or 10 so I did get used to decimal currency.......

It's just what I was always used to and don't want to change just because our barmy government wants to fall in line with EU.

Climbs off soapbox now 
:b_funny:

Gill

       


Rutra ( ) posted Sat, 07 February 2009 at 6:23 AM

😄
I see... but I don't think that UK changed because of the EU only. Don't forget that Australia, New Zealand, etc, etc, also changed to metric system. Actually, Australia and New Zealand did it many years before UK did it, so it was not an influence from UK. Even Canada, so close to USA, has partially converted.


bruno021 ( ) posted Sat, 07 February 2009 at 7:17 AM

Hey, Gill, fancy paying in euros? lol!



Angelsinger ( ) posted Sat, 07 February 2009 at 8:24 AM

Quote - ...When I went to school it was always feet and inches.
We also worked in pints and gallons, not litres.
I even look at the Farenheit side of my thermometer, not Centigrade...

Since I'm in the U.S., I automatically comprehend measurements in feet, inches, etc. It is so ingrained in me that I perceive those measurements based on visual associations.

If you say "6 ft.", for instance, I immediately think of the height of my father.

It's only when something is told to me in meters or litres that I have to do mental calcuations. :P


spedler ( ) posted Sat, 07 February 2009 at 9:37 AM

Quote - USA is the only country that still officially uses the imperial system (or "US costumary units", as it's officially called there).

In fact, it's even more complex than that, as not all US units are not the same as UK (Imperial) units of the same name. The only example I know for sure is the gallon - in the UK about 4.5 litres but significantly less in the US.

We should all be metric, then perhaps engineers wouldn't calculate in two different systems and lose expensive Mars probes... (http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/msp98/news/mco990930.html)

Steve


gillbrooks ( ) posted Sat, 07 February 2009 at 11:46 AM

Quote - > Quote - ...When I went to school it was always feet and inches.

We also worked in pints and gallons, not litres.
I even look at the Farenheit side of my thermometer, not Centigrade...

Since I'm in the U.S., I automatically comprehend measurements in feet, inches, etc. It is so ingrained in me that I perceive those measurements based on visual associations.

If you say "6 ft.", for instance, I immediately think of the height of my father.

It's only when something is told to me in meters or litres that I have to do mental calcuations. :P

That's exactly how I am.   I can visually percieve things in imperial but not metric, though I know 1 m is just under 1 yd but that's all.

If I know I'm going somewhere that's 10 miles away - I know jsut how far that is and roughly, traffic permitting, how long it'd take me.  If someone said 'It's 10 kilometers away'......well, I just wouldn't have a clue.

I've not been in any job where metric knowlege is important so why change ?

I make cakes using ounces not grammes and they come out lovely, fluffy and light   😄

Gill

       


gillbrooks ( ) posted Sat, 07 February 2009 at 11:48 AM

Quote - Hey, Gill, fancy paying in euros? lol!

Not on your nelly
:b_overwhelmed:

Gill

       


hein ( ) posted Sat, 07 February 2009 at 10:43 PM

All you need is a flexible mind, I've mixed and matched units most of my working life, working with people from all over the world at the same time, even now at home we think in different units. I think in metric but explain to my wife (ex US) in ft/inches and with the neighbour who hails from the UK in Imp. units. Real measurement wonders are the number of "tonnes" used by the shipping world (5 or 6 that I can think off) and the Swedish mile (still seen occasionally on rural roadsigns) that will get you at 10k when you think you only have a mile to walk. A neat transfer campaign was run in OZ in the 70's on the Redhead matchboxes, Think Metric with samples :).


ArtPearl ( ) posted Sun, 08 February 2009 at 12:19 AM

I'm a bit like hein - I'm as comfortable in metric and imperial - Grew up in Israel, lived 18 years in the UK and now in the US, so I can convert units on the fly depending who I'm talking to...

Gill - I'm pretty sure Lee Randall at e-on is a she not a he - I talked to her on the phone:)

"I paint that which comes from the imagination or from dreams, or from an unconscious drive. I photograph the things that I do not wish to paint, the things which already have an existence."
Man Ray, modernist painter
http://artpearl.redbubble.com/


MyCat ( ) posted Sun, 08 February 2009 at 3:20 AM

Q: Which is heavier, an ounce of gold or an ounce of lead?
A: Gold. Precious metal weights are measured in troy ounces, and a troy ounce at 480 grains weighs more than an avoirdupois ounce at 437.5 grains.

Q: Which is heavier, a pound of gold or a pound of lead?
A: Lead. There are 16 avoirdupois ounces in an avoirdupois pound but only twelve troy ounces in a troy pound.

I'll stick to metric, thank you very much!


gillbrooks ( ) posted Sun, 08 February 2009 at 11:12 AM

Quote -
Gill - I'm pretty sure Lee Randall at e-on is a she not a he - I talked to her on the phone:)

Whoops!!

And I complain when people think I'm a bloke because I shortened Gillian to Gill.....    :lol:

Gill

       


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.