Tue, Feb 4, 11:35 PM CST

Renderosity Forums / Photography



Welcome to the Photography Forum

Forum Moderators: wheatpenny Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon

Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Feb 03 6:38 am)



Subject: ..flower nr. 12936932..


Antoonio ( ) posted Wed, 15 August 2001 at 7:38 AM ยท edited Fri, 31 January 2025 at 3:30 PM

file_201699.jpg

Another flower from summer vacation, bluebell. No postwork. I kind of like this one. Minolta AF7000, AF300 with closeup lens mounted. Film was 400. .n


leighp1 ( ) posted Wed, 15 August 2001 at 7:49 AM

I like this one too...How do you get the flower so clear and yet have the background blurred..i am trying to learn how to do that, haven't got the hang of it yet.. Leigh


Antoonio ( ) posted Wed, 15 August 2001 at 8:03 AM

...I bet Alpha can tell you the right way, the easy way and the hard way. And many other ways to do it. (not how to do IT, you perverts!) But basically, you gotta use very narrow focusing point. Try different aperures, bigger the number, more blurry back- & foreground. (..or was it smaller the number? Damn, guys help me.) I'm using that closeup lens of mine. Lens optics is 'poor', so area where pic is sharp is really narrow. I dont consider it a fault, I try to get blurry backgrounds. ...libraries contains many intresting manuals and you can also find really good tutorials from net. Worth of reading. Optics, blaah, sounds boring, but when you are holding your cam in your hands and trying to figure out how different lenses works, its not boring at all. Really useful information, opens many new doors. .n


PhrankPower ( ) posted Wed, 15 August 2001 at 2:29 PM

Antoonio got it right. The bigger the apertures number, the narrower the depth of field (acceptable focus area). So the faster the film, the lower you can set the apertures because faster film needs less light. So if you want a wide depth of field, try a faster film. For less depth of field, use slower film. Of course, this is general, and your lighting conditions and what type of shot you are looking for is a factor too. The more light, the more ability to have a wider depth of field. Less light, less D.O.F. I hope this makes sense.


Marshmallowpie ( ) posted Wed, 15 August 2001 at 2:37 PM

Well, what I can say about f-stops is, it doesn't really make sense until you actually try it, take the same photo using different f-stops, record which is which, see what happens, and you'll understand :-) (That is with film cameras anyway...Digitals I have no clue about)


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.