Mon, Dec 23, 10:58 AM CST

Renderosity Forums / Poser - OFFICIAL



Welcome to the Poser - OFFICIAL Forum

Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom

Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Dec 23 8:11 am)



Subject: Dina re-scaling figures as promised


STORM3 ( ) posted Tue, 25 September 2001 at 4:33 PM ยท edited Mon, 23 December 2024 at 10:58 AM

file_213686.jpg

I received an instant message from a member asking for the scalings I used on Dina (see post below). I do not see any reason to keep them secret as anyone with about an hour could probably do better. Anyway these are rough and ready, no refinement, no alternatives tested. I went with the first ones that seemed to look right. I don't know if one can copyright scaling figures but just in case "use them as you please, for commercial and non-commercial purposes". I am sure they will be much improved on by others. Pic attached, default pose, 100mm camera, no tex maps, default Victoria materials, no render. Please note some body parts like hands and fee were left unchanged. Here are the scaling changes I made: Body None Head None Upper Neck Taper 0% Scale 90% X Scale 100% Y Scale 150% Z Scale 100% Neck Taper 0% Scale 90% X Scale 100% Y Scale 150% Z Scale 100% Chest Taper 0% Scale 98% X Scale 92% Y Scale 102% Z Scale 100% L/R Collar Taper 0% Scale 97% X Scale 97% Y Scale 98% Z Scale 111% L/R Shoulders Taper 0% Scale 98% X Scale 110% Y Scale 82% Z Scale 82% L/R Forearms Taper 0% Scale 100% X Scale 110% Y Scale 93% Z Scale 93% Abdomen Taper 3% Scale 100% X Scale 100% Y Scale 103% Z Scale 100% Hip Taper 0% Scale 100% X Scale 95% Y Scale 104% Z Scale 100% R/L Buttocks Taper 0% Scale 104% X Scale 100% Y Scale 100% Z Scale 104% R/L Thighs Taper 0% Scale 104% X Scale 100% Y Scale 96% Z Scale 100% R/L Shins Taper 0% Scale 106% X Scale 100% Y Scale 108% Z Scale 100% Enjoy! STORM


Daffy34 ( ) posted Tue, 25 September 2001 at 6:28 PM

file_213688.jpg

I'll also be posting my formula as soon as I get it worked up (if anyone's interested, that is) ;). Laurie



STORM3 ( ) posted Tue, 25 September 2001 at 6:54 PM

Yes please Laurie. :0) Regards STORM


Cin- ( ) posted Tue, 25 September 2001 at 6:59 PM

Oooh... Laurie, that in itself might just push me over the edge to buying her... I'm still sitting on the fence... but I'm starting to lean... ;)


Daffy34 ( ) posted Tue, 25 September 2001 at 7:07 PM

Some folks don't think we should make a "Vicky" out of her and I agree. But her face is definitely not Vicky's, although it does have a look to it, and we have to admit that Vicky's a little better proportioned than Dina ;). But Dina is really easy to fix. And some parts of her look better than Vicky IMHO and some look not as good. She's just different. Laurie



Tymbo ( ) posted Tue, 25 September 2001 at 7:27 PM

ya know.. out of scale of 1 (being the best) to 10 (the worst) dina is a 5


rtamesis ( ) posted Tue, 25 September 2001 at 11:13 PM

What's with her ankles? They almost look like sticks.


Daffy34 ( ) posted Wed, 26 September 2001 at 6:39 AM

file_213690.jpg

It's lighting mostly. Her ankles aren't that thin. And you could always make them thicker if you wanted to.



Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.