I check nudity when needed, but I do not see it mentioned in the galleries as previously. this morning I posted a thumb of my same render full clothed.then I selected nudity for the final post. I check what is new and nothing was showing about it having nudity. I have noticed on other artists also

You can now show nudity and violence in thumbnails :( I was told that the other day.

Hey @Richardphotos & @Raindroptheelf-- The option is up to YOU. If you wish to see nudity, then leave it unchecked, but if prefer not to, check it. When you upload an image that contains nudity, violence or language, you MUST check the boxes.

Please let us know if you have anymore questions pertaining to this. Thanks so much!

hopeandlove posted at 5:10PM Fri, 18 September 2015 - #4229175

Hey @Richardphotos & @Raindroptheelf-- The option is up to YOU. If you wish to see nudity, then leave it unchecked, but if prefer not to, check it. When you upload an image that contains nudity, violence or language, you MUST check the boxes.

Please let us know if you have anymore questions pertaining to this. Thanks so much!

With the new Design the whole Gallery has changed for the worse, it looks and feels cheap, the endless scrolling that stops at one point so that , if you want to see something again , you have to do the whole scrolling through everything again. The Thumbnails that are now show nudity and violence, why, why has that changed? It worked before didn't it?

I do not mind see that , but if kids browse, they might sit on their parents PC who have thought of checken that they do not want to see nudity and violence because they do not mind.

The whole Site Design is bad designed, and I am not the only one who thinks that.

I loved beeing here, showing my Images, buying... but now I much prefer to go to stores where the sites load quickly and I do not need a tutorial to navigate and I can go through Galleries without scrolling and scrolling and scrolling.

nudity was not the issue but whether or not it is shown below posts by anyone. I am understanding that if a member chooses to not see nudity then those pictures that are checked with nudity, then they will not appear to those not wanting to see such. under the old gallery system if one checked nudity, then the word would appear below the particular post . thanks for your fast answer

Richard, are you saying that when you checked nudity the "contains: nudity" did not show up on the gallery view? :)

i believe he is saying that on the old design, if you applied nudity/violence flags on your uploaded image, when you were in the gallery, underneath the thumbnail image you would see info that contained the following:

image title - artist's name - [in red and in parentheses 'this image contains nudity/violence] - what gallery the image belonged to & the genre - the date of posting - and maybe the time of the posting

now, on the new design, you do not get the red bracketed nudity call out underneath the thumbnail, and i think he is asking about that since it's no longer there.

the whole visible-to-others-under-your-thumbnail warning thing, and/or the use of the Advisory thumbnail, has always been a bit of a catch-22 in the galleries:

even though we had filtering options on the old site as well, some folks liked being forewarned, either with that info under the thumb and/or with the use of the Advisory Warning thumbnails because maybe they weren't filtering, but needed to change what they chose to open/not open due to situations [think lunchbreak at work, or kids in the room, etc].

the opposite use would be that some folks would abuse things a little bit by checking nudity/violence with the hope to garner more views even whenst there was nudity, but no naughty bits showing that truly merited the flag.

sometimes it can still be confusing as to whether or not to click the nudity/violence tags on upload, and i've always played it safe - when in doubt, tick the box. but i've also had one or two instances where i received messages from mods who removed the warnings as they deemed it unnecessary; for example a bloodied figured where violence has happened, but the violence to bloody them is not happening in the image so the violence is implied/inferred instead of being in-your-face, that kind of thing.

@Giana-- I've taken a screenshot below:

You'll see "Contains Nudity," "date" "Artist name" and "Name of image." As of right now, we do not have the genre of the image, but everything else is there. We've implemented "Contains Nudity, Language and Violence" now.

Thanks so much!

yes, i see that in your screenshot.

i have none of that if i am using the same URL as in your screenshot.

i see thumbnails that folks have used that are the old Nudity/Violence thumbnail, but otherwise there are no red flag icons with text telling me which flags the user attached to their image. i see image title and date of upload as well.

and before you ask, last version, latest update, Firefox, AdEdge adblocker w. original subscription only, and yes, it appears the same for me in IE. i've a feeling you see what you do because you're staff... have you created a dummy account for yourself so that you're able to log in on occasion so you can see things as non-Staff? if you have, do you still get the little red text stuff under the thumbs? i ask because if you do, then something isn't translating properly for me...

thanks!

here is what i see when sitting on the same exact URL as you have showing in your screenshot:

what is weird is in your screenshot you're showing a bunch images with misc. dates. so where in the gallery were you precisely, because if i type in your URL, i'm dropped essentially into the What's New category...

That is add Giana. I do see what you mean. Give me a bit to look into this. :)

Why doesn't show my gallery the thumbnails I've selected? MyGallery contains lots of nudity, so according to the old TOS, I've made nudity-free thumbnails for that reason. Please, bring back the old thumbnail system.

We allow nudity/violence/language on the thumbnails now Timberwolf. So you don't have to make nudity-free thumbnails if you do not wish to. :)

A couple weeks ago I checked the "don't show me nudity" flag, and I THINK what happened is that any images with nudity just didn't show up. No Content Advisory cover ... just no image. To check it out, I unchecked the nudity filter, and now I'm seeing images I wasn't seeing before.

Does checking that box make it so those images don't show up at all when I browse? I thought I'd get the Content Advisory, which would give me the option to look or not. There are a couple of people (photogmark, fand), who do tasteful work, and I check both their galleries from time to time, but that doesn't mean I want to see nudity everywhere I look.

Have I got this right? Checking "no nudity" makes it so any images tagged with nudity don't exist in my world?

Tara

pretty much...

unfortunately there's no 'ignore gratuitous' and/or ' show only tasteful' filter - t'is all or nothing...

That is correct auntietk if you check the box that you don't wish to see nudity or any other CA then any artist upload that is flagged as such will no longer show up in your feed. Images flagged or not still have to be within the TOS guidelines and anything inappropriate is dealt with the same as before. There is no level of nudity selection as Giana has stated it is all or nothing.

Ummm ... yeah ... I never thought there might be degrees of okay-ness in the filter. That wasn't my question at all.

Let me clarify:

It used to be that if you checked "no nudity" you would get thumbs with the "Content Advisory" sign, and you could choose to look or not look.

Now if you check "no nudity" you don't see any "Content Advisory" thumbs. The image is just missing. There is no thumb at all. If you go to someone's gallery who regularly posts nudes, you won't see 90% of their gallery, because they allow nudity in thumbnails now, and you've said you don't want to see it. So there's no choice to look or not look, because the images are not there.

Get it?

Tara