Sun, Feb 2, 8:30 AM CST

Renderosity Forums / Poser - OFFICIAL



Welcome to the Poser - OFFICIAL Forum

Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom

Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Feb 02 2:22 am)



Subject: CPU and Poser 11


inquire ( ) posted Sun, 15 December 2019 at 3:02 PM · edited Sun, 02 February 2025 at 6:11 AM

Does Poser 11 make use of processors with multiple cores? If I bought a 3.5 GHz 8 core processor, or if I bought a 3.3 GHz 12 core processor, with which would Poser run faster? The second instance has 4 more cores, but the first instance is faster.

 


seachnasaigh ( ) posted Sun, 15 December 2019 at 3:39 PM · edited Sun, 15 December 2019 at 3:46 PM

Yes. My machines each have two HyperThreaded hex core Xeon processors (server/workstation motherboards often have two CPU sockets), so 24 render threads. Open Task Manager (Ctrl+Shift+Esc) and go to the performance tab while rendering; it should show a graph for each core, and they should all be at/near 100% capacity.

full core usage during rendering.PNG

Multiply the number of cores by the clock speed to get a value of rendering power. 3.3 * 12 > 3.5 * 8, so the 3.3GHz 12-core would render faster. If one/both processors are HyperThreaded, take that into account, since it effectively doubles the number of cores, albeit the virtual cores may only be about 3/4 the speed of the primary physical cores.

Poser 12, in feet.  

OSes:  Win7Prox64, Win7Ultx64

Silo Pro 2.5.6 64bit, Vue Infinite 2014.7, Genetica 4.0 Studio, UV Mapper Pro, UV Layout Pro, PhotoImpact X3, GIF Animator 5


inquire ( ) posted Sun, 15 December 2019 at 3:53 PM

Task Manager? I don't find that on my computer. Do you mean Activity Manager, which is what it's called on the Macintosh?

 


ssgbryan ( ) posted Sun, 15 December 2019 at 7:04 PM

The render engines in Poser are tile based renders. More cores = more tiles are rendered at a time.

That matters if a core gets hung up rendering something like hair.



inquire ( ) posted Mon, 16 December 2019 at 1:45 PM

OK, so more cores will be better, even if the processor speed is a little lower. In the example I gave above, the 3.3 GHz 12 core processor would be better than the 3.5 GHz 8 core processor. Is this correct? Please tell me if I'm misunderstanding this.

 


seachnasaigh ( ) posted Mon, 16 December 2019 at 10:19 PM

Correct; 12 cores @ 3.3GHz gives you a coreXclockspeed of 39.6, while 8 cores @ 3.5 GHz yields 28.0

But you also need to account for whether either/both processors are HyperThreaded, which doubles the number of rendering cores.

Poser 12, in feet.  

OSes:  Win7Prox64, Win7Ultx64

Silo Pro 2.5.6 64bit, Vue Infinite 2014.7, Genetica 4.0 Studio, UV Mapper Pro, UV Layout Pro, PhotoImpact X3, GIF Animator 5


inquire ( ) posted Tue, 17 December 2019 at 3:19 PM

Thanks very much for the info.

 


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.