Mon, Feb 10, 5:45 PM CST

Renderosity Forums / Poser - OFFICIAL

All Forums

Welcome to the Poser - OFFICIAL Forum

Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom

Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Feb 10 10:34 am)

Poser Gallery - Poser Freestuff

Subject: Pro Pack genitals

Warangel opened this issue on Nov 13, 2001 ยท 9 posts
Back to Forum Print
Warangel ( ) posted Tue, 13 November 2001 at 2:01 PM ยท edited Mon, 09 December 2024 at 6:14 PM

Ok, I am not a dumbass. I go to the whole remove genitals thing, but they just stay there. I have tried scaling them and such, but it just doesn't look right. What am I missing here?

shadowcat ( ) posted Tue, 13 November 2001 at 3:00 PM

actually you don't remove the genitals, they should just be invisible. check the heirarchy editor.

otaku ( ) posted Tue, 13 November 2001 at 3:41 PM

Under the menu go to figure, pull down to word genitailia if it's checked the show if not they don't. Scrolling to it should switch them on or off. If it doesn't work you could have a problem with the program. I'm using propak on a mac and it works for me.

Scarab ( ) posted Tue, 13 November 2001 at 5:01 PM

If it's really a problem, scale them down to zero...and watch Dork's face.... Scarab

Huolong ( ) posted Tue, 13 November 2001 at 5:26 PM

The hydrolically extensive ejection frammis and coupling housing group are scalable however the storage and regeneration housing group are not. The retrofit of the LeMoon assemblies, however, obviate the necessity of adjustments mentioned herewithin.

Gordon

namja1955 ( ) posted Tue, 13 November 2001 at 7:11 PM

Yeah, but that's only true if the frammis is diametrically opposed to the entire housing group, unless of course the storage aspect is oppositional with respect to the actual inverse of the scalable ratio.

Scarab ( ) posted Wed, 14 November 2001 at 12:29 AM

"It's not how big it is...it's what you do with it...." ....yeah, right! Scarab

kupa ( ) posted Wed, 14 November 2001 at 12:30 AM

Huolong and namja1955, you guys want a job doing tech support? Anthony and Al, I think we found your replacements. Steve Cooper Curious Lambs

Warangel ( ) posted Sat, 17 November 2001 at 6:44 PM

Damn, I am really in trouble then. The hydrolically extensive ejection frammis and coupling housing group are an integral tertiary component to the existing architecture of my scene, thereby.... ah forget it... Ok, I will try the editor. Thanks for the tips. And my birthday is coming up. Anyone feel like making Kermit the Frog for me? :)

Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.