Thank you! Getting ready to play with Hex again, and this will come in handy.

I have the head morphs, I just don't have the EthnicHeads deltas. I have the V3 SAE version, which from further reading looks like it includes channels for the International Beauties pack. I don't own this, so I don't have the EthnicHeads deltas. Or should I have these with the regular morph pack? I bought the head and body morphs about a year ago -- have they been updated since? I went ahead and hand edited the libraries and took out any references to this folder, and then ticked the Exclude non-existant in library box. It now works correctly.

Tried that and it still didn't work. Can you look and see if you have the EthnicHeads folder for V3/SP3?

@ Naylin -- Thank you so much! It turns out Aiko's morph dials are almost exactly the same as Hiro's, so the existing script should work with either. Thanks for trying, Miss Nancy, it's appreciated. Again, thankyou both for your help.

Attached Link: Python Script

No one can help? The script will NOT give me any information that I can use on the free Aiko LE to make her morph, if anyone is worried about that.

Quote - Since no one has mentioned it, my choice would be the Discworld series. I don't care if it's CG, live or done with sock puppets, but seeing that amazingly rich (and funny) world brought to life would definitely make my century...

Well, Soul Music and Wyrd Sisters have been done as standard animation. Any of the night watch books would translate well to film. My personal pick would have to be Small Gods, although I don't think there is anything especially in that one that would require CGI.

These are beautifully modeled. How generous to release them as a freebie! I wish I could model shoes but all I've managed so far is simple slippers. Did you first model the shoe and then fit it to the foot, or did you build it around the foot as you modeled?

Quote - actually, i've been on this site and others for years, and debated things quite amicably with others.  and i've never called anyone names or insulted them.

Maybe not that you realize. Honestly, I found your post patronizing. You undoubtedly didn't mean it that way, but I found it so. I got cranky because I've become tired of my ideas being waved away as if I'm being unreasonable. My observation was harsh and I apologize if I hurt your feelings. But I won't apologize for having an opinion and expressing it. You certainly don't have to leave. If you enjoy the club then be an adult and ignore the occasional horrible meanie like me who makes you feel bad. Tell me I'm a jerk and go on with what you enjoy. As for me, I'll stay out of it from now on.

Rutra> Quote - Or maybe a new option should be created on Rendo: "Only non-critical comments welcomed".

Well, I think that ought to be the default. You should have to change that option to "critical and non-critical comments welcome." This small change and some common sense would render this club redundant. > Quote - Regarding the obligation to post a comment: if i'm ever obliged to post comments, than i'm out of this group.

I'm not sure anyone has stood up in favor of obligation. In fact I am trying to alert the group that the unwelcome sense of obligation may be enhanced by the current ebot system, where people see an inbox that is both a reminder of the hundreds of deserving images they haven't commented on, and an opportunity to start counting and conceiving imbalances in participation. This may be silly or unreasonable in your opinion, but I think it is a real psychological effect, which can be minimized by a change in method. The fact is, good people are leaving. To me, this is not a good thing. If you think this means I take it too seriously, so be it. I too wanted it to be fun and productive and am hoping common sense will prevail before it all goes away.

ArtPearl> Quote - FiveCat:

You are a clever guy/girl!

Girl. :biggrin: Not too clever -- it just hit me, duh, when I was yapping about the genre filter. > Quote - Using 'critique group' as a key word would certainly work for me -  I dont always use key words, and even when I do, nothing to stop me from adding another one.

Well, I guess really there is nothing stopping us from trying it. No set-up or list or anything. Just start adding Critique as a keyword, and search for that keyword when you have time to comment. Those of us who find the current scheme unwieldy can use keywords and those happy with the status quo can continue on unchanged. We can have a splinter group and anyone who wants to participate can easily. I know my frustration came out in my last post (not directed at you), but it feels like I'm dealing with a clueless manager or something. "Sir, we're losing members; what started as a trickle is building. Feedback says people want our service but there is some disatisfaction with our membership process. Maybe we should consider changing the process." Boss: "Nonsense! I like it this way, so everybody else should too. We just need to explain to them why they're wrong and if it's good enough for me, it's good enough for them." "Right sir. Here's the latest list of cancellations. Now excuse me while I go browse the job sites." Yeah, I'm being cranky today. Sorry.

Quote - i must admit, i don't find it annoying at all. if i don't have time to comment on things i get emailed, i certainly don't have time to go, "oh hey, why don't i look through the critique gallery." 

E-bots come daily. If I can only comment one day a week, I don't want to have to sort through hundreds of emails on the one day,or to do a daily delete of ebots. Members come and go, so favorites have to be updated. I find it inconvenient enough that I stopped participating. Maybe others feel the same way. Obviously you don't. > Quote - my understanding (which could be wrong, i realize) isn't that they feel pressured by the ebots, but by the fact that  others might expect them to comment on their work.

I think the ebots contribute to that uncomfortable feeling of a necessity to respond in kind. They're a daily reminder of expectations, especially as they start to build up in your inbox. This doesn't mean the expectation is real, just a small psychological stress some may feel. If you don't get this, than whoopie for you. Have fun watching people slowly trickle away as they feel unable to keep up. With my suggestion, you look at the filtered gallery when you choose. It's easy to visually filter images without clicking a hundred email links. You don't have to notify anybody if you stop participating. Why in the world would this be objectionable? I just don't get it. :huh: > Quote - and i encourage everyone to use the art theory forum if the gallery subscription model doesn't fit their needs and wants.

whatever. If this is the attitude of others, then so be it. I'll go back to not participating and you can watch your club disappear. Have fun.

Conniekat8 So you would prefer a forum, and I would prefer a new gallery genre (or similar filter). Why can't we have both? If you want to have a more interactive discussion of your image, post in the forum with a pointer to your gallery image. You can choose how in-depth the discussion goes by whether you choose to start a forum thread. Again, personally, I will comment on more images if I can select from a browsable gallery instead of dealing with an overload of ebots or searching through forum entries. That's my choice, and I feel I am probably not alone in my lazy but well-intentioned approach. If no one wants my input, that is okay too. But I have a suspicion that I am not the only one who would find this approach preferable to the current one. I really just posted to state why I left the group, and what would cause me to participate again. If others felt the same way, then the group might prevail. As it is, many artists are leaving, and groups members will lose valuable feedback on their images. I feel that is unfortunate. ArtPeal I've read your previous posts and agree that the multiple selection of galleries and/or genres would be ideal. But, since this option is apparently not being offered, I would at least like to have the option of choosing Critique group as the genre. I know people don't want to post to an unpopular gallery, but is the genre that big a deal? I don't care about the genre listing generally, and there are still key words available for searches. Hey, maybe that is an option right there. Add Critique as a keyword, or some other code word unlikely for a non-member to use. Not as convenient as a separate genre, though.

I'm sorry to see that the club is beginning to unravel. I bowed out a few weeks ago, even though I love the concept and enjoyed participating. What drove me away mostly was the favorites/ebot method of membership. It is time-consuming and awkward to first add all members as favorites, and then try and keep track of all the new and retiring members by revisiting the list and comparing names. Most of us have time constraints, and being faced with an inbox full of e-bot notices can be overwhelming when we only occasionally have the time to comment. I initially liked the idea of a separate gallery, but I understand that this is not really workable from the point of rendo or from people who want to keep posting to the popular galleries. So, how to make it easier? I suggest a way to filter those images that posters would like critiqued. Rendo has certainly found a way to filter for nudity and violence, and also by genre. With a filter you can choose to see just those images from people wishing to be critiqued. You can see thumbnails to better select which to view and critique. Why not just create a new genre called Critique Club? No need to "sign up" or do anything but select the genre and browse and critique the images. I guarantee I would be critiquing many more images with this method. I doubt I am the only one who would find this so much simpler and less irritating then an inbox full of guilt-inducing ebots. :blink: Also, no need for posts here about joining or leaving the club. No membership to worry about. You use the filter if you wish, you comment if you wish. What do you all think? Can we please try this before the whole thing unravels? Lots of good has come out of this so far. We're all better for critiques we've received, and those we've given. I know I really want to participate, and this is the way I WILL participate. Maybe that is also true for those many very good artists who have been leaving recently.

Thank you!