Arggh !!!!! more awesome stuff........ I'm still collecting money to get your texture.......... SLow Down a bit will ya ? just awesome !!!!!!!!!

Here's what I thought about her..... Moon, Randy, Cameron,Georgia Fox,Candice, Siew Lan, Virginia, Chloe, Liz Schultz, Gwen,Vogue, some other exotic names such as : Avid, Serene,Delfi, Dazzle, France,Mischka,Myst, Mournay, Mercedez dees (uhm.. this one is my own nick, sorry)

btw..... regarding Lynn Grant statement, I do not agree totally,... If a shape of a model or characteristic is somehow close,... perhaps : 1. we can sue some major T-shirt companies.... cause they have broken the law by copying someone else's work. 2. we can sue DAZ and the makers of Dina and everyother artist in the world cause they copy the work of God. (well if you believe one) 3. Applied to every other products and everyuthing that you have seen, everything is a copy. BUT in order to solve this matter, all we can do is to take a look at HOW MUCH work and HOW FAR someone has spent their energy for a finished product. More importantly, follows the guideline of the patent office (cause they do have the power to enforce the rule). I dun think anyone can make a law for others. Except the gathering of every parties and major representatives in a table to voice a decision. (yup the basic concept of democracy) dees

From dees, the president of the "my own room and my own PC" Who makes the rules ? Is it the government ? Is it a big company ? Is it the patent office ? 1. Is the pose, posing characteristic okay or not. 2. Or the close UVmapping system to implement a texture is okay or not. 3. Is a mesh judged by the number of poly's or the shape and the geometry of the model it self.... (and if it is ... how?) 4. More importantly....... who make these rules ? Is the rule totally approved by the patent office or not. This basic stuffs can AVOID judicial probs and furthermore piracy of someone's model.... and more importantly, TO PROTECT the chance and the right of new modelers. Personally, if a model have a very close physical characteristic, but if it's made from scratch and the person can prove it, (maybe show the other party on how they begin the modelling, so FULL documentation is necessary) it have full rights. Don't hate DAZ folks.......... they are concerning about their products,.... but don't take any accusation or messed up jokes about the other party too. If you need someone to throw a joke at........ try Me !!! dees

With all do respect to DAZ, especially to Mr. Dan Farr... DAZ always have a statement that .bla2 .. a derivative, .. ..bla2 of a product, therefor it can't.... bla2. I think we need more explaining from DAZ in every statements, concerning which one is ok or not. 1. Is the pose, posing characteristic okay or not. 2. Or the close UVmapping system to implement a texture is okay or not. 3. Is a mesh judged by the number of poly's or the shape and the geometry of the model it self.... (and if it is ... how?) 4. More importantly....... who make these rules ? Is the rule totally approved by the patent office or not. This basic stuffs can AVOID judicial probs and furthermore piracy of someone's model.... and more importantly, TO PROTECT the chance and the right of new modelers. Personally, if a model have a very close physical characteristic, but if it's made from scratch and the person can prove it, (maybe show the other party on how they begin the modelling, so FULL documentation is necessary) it have full rights. Since DAZ have been teh parents of poser modelling (for me it is), I, and the public need to know the legal prosecutions of every or at least some major DAZ cases or some formalities in the US patent office or Court. I can't let DAZ be another Bill "hell" Microsoap..... I have too much trust and love in DAZ products, and it's wide ranged products in 3D. And still I want this company to expand more than the current state. concerning, dees.......

whoah........ heheh......... check on the runtime/geometry folder for the objs....... and runtime/library/character for the actual link within poser. The ussual DAZ model ussually comes in .exe, (just like query said)and insert itself in the character/Zygote or character/DAZ. THe other models however comes with no .exe files....... but still arranged to insert themself to your poser directory :)

hmm........ let's get him a credit wiilya....... cause I never seen a robber excuse himself to the bank's security guard, or a thief asking permission to enter a house......... Gee....... if that really is happening....... we all live in a very wonderful world.......... "crack-bang" (hmm......... guess..........over 20 minutes... maybe 30 I guess, not locked out yet)

well........... be patient........ I belive nerd3d has develop a new line of walk designer for vicky ........... check out his stuffs for a few days ahead.......... dees

eric....... gee..... I guess we can forget "the party" plan ? oh well........ :(

HEY ......... LEAVE IT......... THE PERSON who wrote the story did not point fingers. Imagine an intel officer telling the US senates, Intel officer : sir.... we have terrorist in the country. one of the senator : who ? Intel officer : why does it matter ? terrorist in the country. Freak out !!! As for who wrote the message, don't throw arguments if you can't prove it. Otherwise pulling a fight and that's what you did.

heya. I was just thingking, are you avoiding a "troll" ? troll = person who by means destroyed or comment negatively, violating TOS (yes, read the TOS)against your artwork. Well I have some experience with that kinda troll, but hey, I'm not 7 yrs old anymore. And I really don't care if some ppl grades my artwork as "ultimately bad" or calling me names. Som points that I'd like to make : 1. Be proud to your artwork. 2. Realizing that 10 out of 100 ppl will not agree totally with you, some even hates you without reason. 3. Move on, great artists in the world do have some enemies. 4. You aren't 7 yrs old, move on. (if you are, sorry :) 5. The true judge of art is yourself. Cause it's an expression of your mind.

The problem of art theft,... 1. Not much asking for a portfolio, cause there aren't much potential CG company in 3rd world country. But there are many mugs, printing and T shirt companies. 2. They ussually printed as shirt, poster, mug, which my point is.... They do make money. 3. Eventhough we come down to the ISP, still the boundary of law will not able you to get the thief. You can go to whatever federal officer, still they can't change what rules are running today in another country. 4. The history told us, that this is a losing fight. Don't gives up hope yet, cause in the future there will be ways to smack, stump, slice in half... the theft.

gee.... TOS has just become a license to kill these days ?

I think it's clear.... but in the future, it's expected for much clearer spesification of PC requirements, version of any software included, and Renderosity actions to provide a better service when ppl's with Bill case continue to pops up. anything which is not under the commercial add, advertisement, and license agreement are subject to law charges.

I know what a troll is.... BUT this make every comments in rosity generates rainbow, eventhough the art is suck