LOL! Don't forget, this is a privately owned web site. You don't have a RIGHT to be here, you have a PRIVILEGE to be here. You should also know that I, as much as you, find the TOS as confusing and as short-sighted as the rest. But I also know that I'm not being forced to do anything, other than agree to accept the TOS, or move elsewhere, if I so choose. Last time I checked, membership was free. I'm not trying to shove anyone anywhere. What I'm saying is, if you're truly as pissed as your writing suggests, find another place to host. Now...breathe....breathe...breathe :)

Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=512103&Start=1&Artist=Ona&ByArtist=Yes

DarkElegance wrote: "OHH and healthy enviroment for youths?????/ HOW IS IT HEALTHY BEATING INTO THEIR HEADS THAT THE NUDE HUMAN FORM IS DIRTY OR UNACCEPTABLE? I would LOVE to see the morality police up in heaven facing god and going "ya know that whole form you did...the..human...was just dirty and sick..really what were you thinking puting breasts and penises on people?"" You seem upset. So upset that you're actually screaming. I can see spit flying from your fingers. Why not find another site to host your images? Find one that fits into your way of thinking. Better yet, buy a domain and host them yourself. If you don't like the TOS, then split. What's the big deal? And just who is beating what into kids' heads?

DarkElegance wrote: "if you do not like nudity...DONT LOOK you do not like implied sexual situations" then DO NOT LOOK but stop taking OUR rights and expression away from us!" Well, that's a little difficult now, isn't it? I was here only yesterday and had big ol' poorly rendered, Poser rendered pink schlong staring me right in the face while viewing the All & All "Whats New" Images. Why not forbid nudity in the thumbnails and require nudity tags on the images that have nudity?

Gee, look what happens when I get to Atlanta... Tracing route to www.renderosity.com [65.244.140.3] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 19 ms 18 ms 18 ms wbar8.sea1-x-x-xxx-001.sea1.dsl-verizon.net [x.x.x.x] 2 18 ms 18 ms 18 ms x.x.x.xx 3 20 ms 20 ms 21 ms ge-6-0-0.mp1.Seattle1.level3.net [209.247.9.41] 4 36 ms 37 ms 36 ms so-2-0-0.mp2.SanJose1.Level3.net [64.159.0.218] 5 35 ms 34 ms 34 ms so-7-0-0.gar2.SanJose1.Level3.net [64.159.1.78] 6 38 ms 37 ms 37 ms so-7-0-0.edge1.SanJose1.level3.net [209.244.3.142] 7 36 ms 45 ms 36 ms bpr1-ge-5-3-0.SanJoseEquinix.cw.net [208.173.54.53] 8 37 ms 39 ms 39 ms dcr1-so-4-3-0.SantaClara.cw.net [208.173.54.66] 9 94 ms 95 ms 95 ms dcr1-loopback.Atlanta.cw.net [208.172.66.99] 10 95 ms 94 ms 97 ms agr3-so-0-0-0.Atlanta.cw.net [208.172.75.10] 11 95 ms 94 ms 94 ms acr2-loopback.Nashville.cw.net [208.172.114.62] 12 98 ms 97 ms 98 ms renaissance-application-facility-llc.Nashville.cw.net [208.172.113.146] 13 97 ms 98 ms 97 ms ve1.sw1.bna1.rentech.net [65.244.143.249] 14 97 ms 98 ms 97 ms ge1-2.fw.bna1.rentech.net [208.138.126.229] 15 98 ms 98 ms 98 ms 65.244.140.3 Trace complete. I did this three times, these are the best results. I tried this one hour ago, timed out from Atlanta on.

So it's not just me then, good. Half the time I can't even view gallery images. Historically, this site has been slow, but it seems far worse. I get DNS errors every third click. Has your ISP put caps in place, or is it a matter of bad programming? Thank God I'm not on dial-up, although it seems like I am every time I visit here. It's one of the reasons why I don't post images here anymore :(

Google has within it's own database over 3 BILLION web pages. Now, if only one percent of those pages are artwork related... You're going to be quite busy, sounds like you've gotten yourself into a 24/7/365 job. You wrote: "They want to let everyone know that their images are not for purposely downloading without permission." They give me permission whether they like it or not every time I view them. Each and every one of their images, including the page I'm typing upon now, are stored within a folder called temporary internet files. Personally, I feel you're providing a false sense of security to people here. Are you saying that you will guarantee the safety of artist images, all because of the due diligence of your newly, self-imposed policemanship? Good luck.

Oh, God!!!! Will an Admin PLEASE and INSTANTLY kill this thread?!?!?!?