Looks like one of Koz's, actually. In the thumbnail at the site, it's blond for Vicky (if I remember right), but has a brunette texture as well.

What kind of look do you want? That might help. And remember that Koz's transmapped P4 hair looks pretty damn good, even in closeup, if you want something real conservative. JS also has a few guy hair pieces that look better than decent as well.

About the only hair props I've found that works as well as Koz are anything by Neftis -- resource hogs but well worth it. They leave almost everything at DAZ in the dust (sorry, Anton).

Awwwww, sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetttttttt!

he has no genitalia Hey, why should he be any different from any of the other Poser characters of late? :)

The ratio of female models -vs- male models in the Poser world is about the same ratio of female humans -vs- male humans on the planet Earth Uh.... I don't think so, bud. The ratio has women slightly ahead, like 52 to 48. In Poserland, it's more like 5 to 1. Not even close.

Sorry, Lyrra, but "he" really doesn't look much like a boy, except in the most superficial of ways. There's still those damn collagen lips (what are those, a Poser requirement for every model?) and the really femmy eyes. The chest hair is a nice touch, but way too overdone, particularly since he doesn't seem to have much on his arms or legs as well.

"The page cannot be displayed" ARRGGHHH.

"Oh, c'mon, honey, it was just one beer. Well, okay, it was a mini-keg, but I can handle my alcohol." "No way, buster. Give me the damn truck keys now."

I'm having trouble getting to the page -- I keep getting the "this page is not available" message. Is there a problem? Or is my ISP being cranky? I'd really like to see what this is about.

have his baby used in "pornographic renders" LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please! We've all seen the renders of this chick. Is he gonna seriously tell me they're not even the slightest bit pornographic?

Music by Filk like Me :)

. and, in his exuberance, forgot to punch the nudity button When it was pointed out to him, Poppi, he immediately went into "victim" mode and starting going on about political repression and some other such nonsense. Even now, we have folks who think that it's easier to play semantic games than just hitting the damn nudity button. Common sense says, "No clothes? Then the person's naked. Hmm, I guess the nudity button applies." But see, that's too narrow a definition for some folks. This whole thing is starting to sound like, "Well, I guess it depends on your definition of are", to quote the Clinton impeachment. Have fun, kiddies. I'm outa this one. It's all become a tad too stupid for my tastes.

All I'm saying is let the poster make his or her decision and if a viewer doesn't like it, let them "run" to the mods. In other words, the original poster should feel no sense of responsibility to his fellow members whatsoever. It's all about "ME" and "MY art", which is really what you're saying, Chuck. It's all about "REPRESSING ME as a political act", right? I had no idea this site was becoming that selfish and egocentric. Thanks for letting me know.

Hmm. Let's see. Derisive ones like "prudes". Completely OT ones like "Nazis". Those little gems have shown up more than a few times, so let's not pretend otherwise, huh? Insofar as the flag, as was pointed out in the last thread, Rsity has its rules regarding forum threads with images of nudes. If you don't like them, don't let the door hit you on the way out. If you're gonna ignore them out of some pretense of being a political victim (like a certain poster we all know), then you're gonna get jumped on, and the mods will sort it out later. But frankly, the mods have enough to do without worrying about whether or not folks around here are gonna play by one extremely simple little rule. So get over it and move on.