Renderosity Forums
Search Results: Threads
48 threads found!
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| louguet | 2 | 265 | ||
| louguet | 0 | 142 |
(none)
|
|
| louguet | 5 | 159 | ||
| louguet | 1 | 120 | ||
| louguet | 0 | 150 |
(none)
|
|
| louguet | 1 | 129 | ||
| louguet | 2 | 169 | ||
| louguet | 0 | 128 |
(none)
|
|
| louguet | 5 | 188 | ||
| louguet | 5 | 182 | ||
| louguet | 1 | 127 | ||
| louguet | 2 | 119 | ||
| louguet | 4 | 418 | ||
| louguet | 2 | 110 | ||
| louguet | 11 | 359 |
Search Results: Comments
125 comments found!
The Sponza scene uses global radiosity, and the ultra mode is the highest quality mode but also the slowest, so it is a worst case scenario. It is obvious that no one uses radiosity nor ultra mode in animation. And video frames are never rendered in 1024 x 768, but 720x576 or 768x576 in PAL format.
Thread: Some benchmarks with Vue 5 Esprit | Forum: Vue
Yes, Windows XP Professional Service Pack 1 for everyone. XP1800 with 768 MB, XP2400 and Dual MP with 512 MB, P4C et Dual Xeon with 1 GB.
Thread: A benchmark for Vue 4 Pro with some results | Forum: Vue
Vue has always been faster on AMD than on Intel. It uses raw floating-point calculations that are more efficiently handled by the Athlon XP architecture. With Vue 4 Pro, hyperthreading helps, but still the P4 is not terribly impressive.
As for my XP2400, it has nothing out of the ordinary : 2 Ghz, Epox EP-8RGA+ motherboard, NVidia nForce 2 IGP chipset, FSB 266 (2x133), 512 MB of CAS2.5 memory (2.5-3-3-6 timings).
I re-ran the benchmark today on an overclocked - but perfectly stable - 2.4Ghz P4C (the famous M0 stepping) running at 3300 Mhz, with Abit IC7-Max 3 motherboard, i875P chipset, FSB 1100 Mhz (4x275), 220 Mhz memory bus (5:4 ratio) with 1 GB of CAS2 Corsair XMS3500 (2-3-2-5 timings). Vue4 Pro bench : 21 mn 03 s, so about the same as a Dual Athlon MP1800+ (2 x 1533 Mhz).
Now I am curious about the results on an Athlon 64.
Thread: A benchmark for Vue 4 Pro with some results | Forum: Vue
I understand :) I needed the latest build because it solved a lot of problems with network rendering (RenderCow was broken in the previous builds).
Thread: A benchmark for Vue 4 Pro with some results | Forum: Vue
nanotyrannus, apparently the WaterGate scene does not use a lot of ram so it is logical that there is no difference between 512 MB and 1 GB. One must also make sure that the same build (270996) of Vue 4 Pro is used, sometimes there are differences in render times between builds. Now it would be interesting to see some results on PowerMacs and Athlon 64 / Opteron.
Privacy Notice
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Thread: Some benchmarks with Vue 5 Esprit | Forum: Vue