I myself would've preferred Ocularis Infernum. That sounds cool.. heh heh

That looks like a digital painting...

Those are my thoughts, Pen. Most of those props are made with far more morphs than anyone would ever need to use on a child figure. I don't see a reason for it either. And the idea that people went so in an uproar over this issue is common sense. You ask a stupid question (yes, in this day and age, it is a stupid question) and you'll get stupid answers. You may as well just said "Anyone know where I can get naked pictures of little girl's parts?".

Yeah... definitely smooth and hairy... I don't care about tan lines though.

I don't like it.. it usually looks like badly burned hair to me.. or hair that's been damaged in a sandstorm. But looking at these pictures you guys have done some great things with it! Love the arm hair!!

THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU!!! Finally someone has heard my pleas!!! WOO HOOO!!!

Doug Winger has issues.... I recall saying nearly the same thing about ending world hunger and war if we could somehow harness the power that breasts have over men!

No GIRL here either! All hail the Anti-GIRL guild!!!

Realistic Genitalia on both, more attention to eye details... figures always seem to be dead around the eye area.. not sure why. Definitely would love to see individually moveable toes... better neck and underarm movements... more potential to change the look of the face and body.

If somehow we could harness the power that breasts seem to have over men we could stop world hunger and end war.

Good Gods... that Vicki picture looks like my boyfriend's mother! Yeeeeeesh!

This blows, now we're making actual sets specifically for the female models?

Buy David.

Must suck to have the whole world against just you.