Congrats to all who were included. Humbled to be selected..

Attached Link: PauerKorde Photography

It's is an honour to be selected for inclusion.. Thanks so much!

 

~MRNot

It's a privilege to be included in the collection.. Thanks very much!

It's indeed an honour to be selected. A lot of amazing work on display here at Renderosity..

Attached Link: MRNot @ Google's PicasaWeb

I am humbled and honoured to have had an image selected for inclusion in this fine collection.. There are some amazing shots in this group, to be sure. I plan on spending a little time familiarizing myself with the photos & the photographers, that I might learn a little something..

Thanks for the consideration & the comments..

Cheers!

Quote - Ok its very easy to get confused when not been using an SLR for a while.

 With the canon 400D/XTi coming with the 18-55 mm f 3.5 to f 5.6 as the standard lens what do you suggest to get for a good first lens to use for most outdoor landscape shots.  Preferable wide angle zoom if possible...

I'm still an inexperienced amateur, but I'll add $0.02 anyway. That kit lens is pretty lacklustre as far as objective quality goes. It blows away a lot of point & shoot lenses, but I would definitely consider either getting ONLY the body and buy your own lenses, or get a slightly more expensive kit with a better lens (I've think I've seen it  bundled with the 28-135 instead, but I can't remember where). I've been doing OK with that 18-55 kit & a Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro zoom, but I'm looking to upgrade BOTH of these lenses. I'm renting the Canon 18-55 f/2.8 IS USM to see how that is, and I will also be checking out the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 USM along with a teleconverter for wildlife stuff. My problem with the cheaper lenses is in the glass, aperture size AND in the focus motor. That Sigma only cost me $200US and the kit lens is valued even lower I'm fairly certain. I've had issues with both autofocus clarity & with exposure due to small aperture in a lot of the things I want to shoot. I know I could do a little better with technique, but I suspect I'm going to continue to be limited by the hardware I currently have.

As usual, your mileage may vary..

Here's one I took using the 18-55 lens, using the Macro auto mode, probably the very day I brought the camera home the first time.. (this is uncropped, but reduced from 3888x2592 down to XVGA.. for reference)

> Quote - I am thinking about buying a DSLR, and Georges Hoens mentioned the Canon 400D to me. I was wondering if anyone here had an opinion on it, and on the EF-S18-55 lens that comes with the kit I found.....Would the 400D be okay for me, what do you guys think? (My alternative might be the Olympus 510, but I am only starting to begin considering making up my mind right now, so I'm not adverse to other suggestions. *g*)

My $0.02: I was previously not interested in photography at all, really.. This past year, I decided to dump my archaic Hewlett Packard point&shoot & get a new camera. I toiled over the decision of P&S vs DSLR, and what brands to consider. I consulted a co-worker who has a recently purchased an Olympus 8MP DSLR (sorry, but I don't recall the model). I consulted with a non-Renderosity online associate whose husband is an amazing photographer. After all that, I decided on the EOS Rebel Xti (As it's known in the US market/400D elsewhere). Immediately, using the kit lens & "Basic Zone" shooting modes, as they call them (Portrait/Full Auto/Macro/Landscape/etc), I was blowing myself away with the quality of the output. When compared with ANY semi-pro photographs, they weren't as sharp or interesting, but I admittedly know little of what I'm doing.. I found myself wanting to do wildlife photography for which the 18-55mm just wouldn't cut it, and after more consultation & discussion, ended up with the Sigma APO DG 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Macro. The included pic was taken the day I received it, using (automatic)Landscape Mode at 300mm (non-Macro), resulting in ISO-100, f/7.1, 1/500" settings.

Now, since I got my Sigma, my Olympus-using co-worker had decided it was time for him to upgrade to a Sigma 50-400mm lens, which he ordered in (May?), and still hasn't received yet. I can't speak for actual Olympus lenses, but this situation makes me happy I decided to go with Canon for architecture.. My co-worker has begun considering whether he should dump the Olympus simply because he's concerned about availability of lenses as time goes on.. Your mileage may vary.

As I've gotten to know the camera, I have settled on mostly Aperture Priority shooting, and I'm getting to the point that the 300mm lens doesn't get me close enough to what I want to shoot (very often, anyway). Conveniently enough, here in the US at least, there are vendors that will rent you lenses for multiples of weeks for very reasonable rates, so I have a feeling next Spring (or earlier) will find me experimenting with a 2x teleconverter, and/or a Canon 70-200mm f/2.4 USM IS plus some wide angle lenses, loong before I finally decide to actually spend more money on glass.

I think your research is going to pay off for you in your decision very well. I personally have only used the 400D/XTi, and am still a complete novice, so my opinion is skewed, but take a look at some of the recent additions to my gallery, and see what you think about the things this camera/lens combination can do in the hands of an impatient, untrained idiot..

My first visit to the Photography forums.. (Yeah, I know.. Several of you have kindly seen some of my photos in my gallery already and commented. I'm a slow-learner..) This isn't where I *LIVE*, but it's not far away. It's where I work: Annapolis, MD, and my dog's first visit since we adopted him (can't vouch for any visits he may have made in his first 18 months of life with another companion). He wasn't quite sure about many of the sounds of the harbour, but he enjoyed the smells immensely!