Adman?

No it's not a recent change. It's always been like that.

Hmmm interesting the different ways you all do this. The way I use is to save as an uncompressed PSD format. Then use the alpha channel. I would never import a backdrop in to Poser. A lot of quality is lost. If I really need a backdrop in Poser I use a square prop and put the bkground on that

oops beat me too it :)

Attached Link: http://digitalcrafts.e.fiw-web.net/

you could reduce the size of the areola on the texture map

personally I would probably go for the texture approach. It should be possible to find some nice rinestone patterns and paste them on to your tshirt tex map.

Why don't the merchants upload there free items to the Freestuff section like everyone else? What's the point of doing it in this convoluted way?

How is this going to stop anyone stealing images. If someone wants to steal pics they form an account, takes 5 minutes false name etc and then you take the pics. In fact I can not see any reason for this at all.

"Many of the ads removed were NOT, I repeat NOT against the rules." so are you saying that banner ads that did not have some nudity in them were deleted?

Kawecki and everyone else I have nothing against nudity at all and I don't care what the images are in the MP. My post was and still is to point out that the rules of Renderosity, whether by negligence or whatever, were not been consistantly applied. Also, there was no attack angainst the quality of the MP items or any personal attack intended against the vendors. The 3 examples I gave were the 1st 3 I came across.

From "Product Submission Guidelines" "Child Nudity Due to legal liability surrounding Children and Child pornography, we will not allow any nude pictures of children in The MarketPlace. This includes products advertised as teens, pre adolescent, child like fairies, etc..." Printed it again to try and make it clear. Pay particular attention to the 2nd sentence. If these are the rules then enforce them. Be consistant. If this message was bringing attention to nude kids in the gallery the images would be deleted immediately and the offendor warned or banned. Different rules appear to apply to vendors. I have nothing against the vendors that I have used as examples it's the inconsistancy in rule application I object too. In the 3rd example, I have brought attention to, two have been censored the other 1 hasn't. Again no consistancy of rule enforcement.

Attached Link: http://market.renderosity.com/softgood.ez?ViewSoftgood=6296&ViewImage=3#Image

Attached Link: http://market.renderosity.com/softgood.ez?ViewSoftgood=9545

What was inaccurate about my previous message and since when do you delete threads for being inaccurate? kb I didn't imply anything that is a subjective view Mosca no point in replying to your creative comments