censorship is in full swing ladies and gents. I was just threatened with a banning. because my thumbnail was an exact representation of what was in my image. It's not just nudity at stake here. There WAS NO nudity in my thumbnail. period.

Well, that's not surprising. i do tend to ask the questions that no one wants to answer.

Like I stated, there looks to be changes due in the galleries because of the certain words that are bing used. completely, and alltogehter clearly express that there are comming changes, and I for one would like a heads up BEFORE it is implemented. Sure, they aren't talking about getting rid of nudes ALTOGETHER or COMPLETELY, but there are changes, aren't there?

That is what MOST of my thumbnails have been. But I can't do that anymore due to the new change. I'd rather see a thumb that has the full pic as well. And it makes it easier as well. Because then you don't have to make yet another picture to put up as a thumb.

Why was my question blow off like it was nothing? Does this mean that YES there are changes comming to the gallery as well? Or just that you don't want to answer yet untill it's too late?

I would like to point out the obvious VERY GLARING misleading sentences please.
We have NO plans in the foresable future to do away with nudity altogether"
"We have no plans to ban nudity completely in the galleries."

So, would you like to clarify the upcomming changes to the galleries so people can leave NOW and avoid the hassle of an overnight turnaround?

Wait! Theres a naughty chat room?!  Linkie please! LOL!

Quote - the PTB have decreed. So like or lump it.
This message is the word.
praise be to the PTB.

sarcasm I hope
not me.

Quote - *
I'm outta here. you and several others have no interest in a coherent arguement.

I want coherent argument, NOT mindless repeating of facts that are vague. I can't fight someone who doesn't have the answers.

I've got images to make and thumbnails to post. If no one want's to answer my questions from my previous posts, I ASSUME that I am NOT in violation of TOS. Censorship is censorship in any form. I do agree with the child nudity one. But being told that you can't have a thumbnail that is descriptive of your picture without having to chop up your work to make a thumbnail is just plain rediculus. You CANNOT have an accurate representation of what is ACTUALLY in the picture if you have to chop up said picture to make a thumbnail. A head, unless it is a portrait, is NOT THE WHOLE picture, therefore, NOT an ACCURATE representation of what the whole picture is!. if there is Nudity in the picture, HOW exactly is that going to be represented in the thumbnail if even WORDS are censored. Don't expect it to stop here. in just 1 night, they changed the rules from saying one thing to another!

so Khai, ANSWER MY QUESTIOn if you know it all.
My thumnbnail DOES NOT violate TOS. And I WILL use it!

I can't use my thumbnail, I can't make just the image it'self the thumbnail, so basically you are saying that I have to do 2 pictures instead of just 1 straight render. I HARDLY IF EVER do postwork, so there is no reason for me to have jasc open. NOW i have to wait 20 minutes while poser shuts down and jasc opens up JUST tom ake a picture that suits YOUR needs. My thumbnail is accurate and DESCRIPTIVE without using "censored language.

my thumbnail IS an accurate example of the work that is inside. The work is of a female human body. The thumbnail is a descriptive of that. And most of my thumbs were of the images themselves. I didn't resize them. The few that are there, were made at a different computer. mine cannot open both poser and jasc at the same time. You keep saying the same thing over and over again without telling anyone anything. Where are the other mods? Or do YOU make the rules yourself? I have seen many thumbnails that didn;'t show the picture inside at all./ One of my favorites to date is "Sir poops alot" Are you saying that was unacceptable as well? Everyone will see things differently, but you seem to be the only one who's opinion counts at all.

Quote - Post a complet list of "BANNED" and  SUGGESTIVE work, blubs, bots, smuges and such so that we know what the h.ll you talking about!!  

I second that motion. Where will it end?
DGD'S thumbnail was funny as well as tasteful. I see absolutly NOTHING suggestive OR censored about it!
I'm going to use nothing but second skins from now on.  It's rediculus how things are getting out of hqnd. i spend money I can't even afford to spend on here because of the vendors who make the fantastic second skins. i am also a vendor myself. Will you start telling people that we have to remove all traces of nipples now? Are we not going to be allowed to post women at all now> Will we never even to be able to SAY the word NUDE anymore? I see this as getting bigger instead of slowing down>< 2 days ago it was jus tno nudity in thumbnails, NOW you can't have certain language.