@lesbentley: you're welcome :)

ps: seems, somehow the backslashes got lost, so here's the path again:
"%USERPROFILE%AppDataLocalTempQueue Manager2.0PoserTextureCache"

...

fabulous photo. more a painting then a photo actually. wonderful, perfect.

knock-out green... the dof is so extreme, but it makes it fairly abstract. like that. btw: the tomato-tif (...) if u still like - send it to office@graphh.net... was a bit (and still am) busy, so...

one late comment: excptional composition. and very interesting to see a bit of what went in there. extraordinary stuff!

er, about that sharpness digicam thing... this is not original size, isit? so if u sized it down how? original pix? you lend me the org for some testing, hmmm, won't u ?? [cheeese] btw: didn't thought abouta digicam photo at all but IMO there really is some small amount of digicamcommon noise init... anyhow - asisaid: top notch photo!

WOW. this is it. u did exactly the right things to it IMO. nothing more to say - great work! :)

for me (if i'm allowed to) no text :) at least not that way. don't want to sound so harsh. extrasmiley lemmesay; imo the style of the typo is not that bad for that img. try to experiment a little maybe it just has to be a little smaller... myabe be a bit more bold in placing the text . not just besides the figure (where u think it won't hurt at first sight), just a few thoughts... btw: nice work u've done here, nice photo esp. & model, editing is up its way... u'll make it with ps i'm sure!

WOW. i really love images like this. minimalist and abstract approaches in one even if the subject is totally natural & clear, maybe just because of, don't know...

doruk, i dig the third. perfect crop imo. one funny thing comes into my mind esp. because of renderosity: if u haven't seen the other two images the first best what comes in mind is - poser with ps noise/grain - but somehowe u would instantly know thats not true... its so artificial natural and in a way living... great series again.

alpha, got the point, ur of course right. at the worst i had to add a little noise if the quality was too good at first :)) but one pain ITA comes up quickly: i had to buy a new digi to get better results (in terms of noise at least). the sony p5 optic is crap ('cuse me) but i love it though. would call it digi-lomo (hm, in respect thereof one other drawback, common to most digicams: it last to long from pressing the ON button till the first shot...)... anyhow: it will get better i think. shot more fast'n'quick'n'dirty photos in the last 3 months than the 10 years before, improvement is natural when just doing something constantly and with interest/bit enthusiasm... :)

:::all the major steps, sadly IMO this don't really show too much... anyhow: the only step where i edited just a single part of the img was from 7-8 where i raised the bolt a bit in contrast. of course its hard to see how the textures changed over the time... 9-13 the typo came in. in 11 & 12 two crops of the same sky (also my photo, just for completeness) were overlayed to change the overall color. only basic filters used... motion blur, gaussian blur, selective blur, sharpen more, free tachyon negative fx from sandwater (flaming pear now) and color adjusting of course. all in layer/ layer/ layerwise subtracting/ adding/ multiplying/ whatever-u-may-think of. hm. sounds not to over complicated. .)

well, well, well, then it would be so good that i don't want to take my hands on it in PS, just kidding...

but seriously spoken, maybe someone else shares his thoughts too... IMO if the subject and the principal, overall 'outlook' of the photo is interesting then the worse quality almost demands some sort of photoshopping confrontation. and, at least, the worse quality of the photo at the very beginning is MUCH of the (lets call it so) 'artisitc' quality it might get/have (hopefully) at the end.

think i wouldn't have achieved this result (which i'm very happy with) if the shot was in the quality u would wish for it to persist as a 'good' photograph alone.

heyse...

wow. dubidu. instantly fallen in love with nr.6! so well balanced. wonderful. & a really wonderful series!!

erm, date would be enough..