Sat, Jan 11, 7:07 AM CST

Renderosity Forums / Photoshop



Welcome to the Photoshop Forum

Forum Moderators: Wolfenshire Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon

Photoshop F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Jan 06 5:28 am)

Our mission is to provide an open community and unique environment where anyone interested in learning more about Adobe Photoshop can share their experience and knowledge, post their work for review and critique by their peers, and learn new techniques while developing the skills that allow each individual to realize their own unique artistic vision. We do not limit this forum to any style of work, and we strongly encourage people of all levels and interests to participate.

Are you up to the challenge??
Sharpen your Photoshop skill with this monthly challenge...

 

Checkout the Renderosity MarketPlace - Your source for digital art content!

 



Subject: Adobe Streamline Conversion Settings


SPACEY ( ) posted Fri, 24 January 2003 at 10:38 PM · edited Tue, 07 January 2025 at 11:12 AM

Does anyone know any good conversion setting in Adobe Streamline for lineart scans? SPACE

Must've slipped my mind...but it's the thought that counts...

http//www.wholebitmedia.com


Hoofdcommissaris ( ) posted Sun, 26 January 2003 at 5:28 PM

Yeah. settings... My copy came with a bunch of standard settings. For Line Art too. Or maybe they will be called "Technical" or something. Those give good starts. With line art scans, you should remember that the needed dots-per-inch of the original material is much higher than with your standard color rgb conversion. If you have a manual, the secret is in there... And after years of experimenting, a lot of times I import the thing in Illustrator And do it myself. So I do not have to get rid of the waste... The resulting .eps most of the time is much easier to handle afterwards. Really. It depends on what you want from the end result, but Streamline stuff is most usefull when you want quick art from photographs. Lineart, when scanned at high resolutions, results in 'traced' pictures, that look a bit worse compared to hi-res tif files... The dot per inch thing for line art is MUCH higher than the one for other stuff. Like 1200 dpi. Before you know your Streamline stuff looks like something made our of Lego or something degraded/washed out. I found out that old-fashioned line-art just can not be transferred to a vector graphic automatically without losing some of the information. But on a part of the assignments, it does not make a big difference on the effect. That margin (does it have any effect on the impression the final art makes) actually defines if it is needed to re-draw the whole thing, or go with the Streamline-provided flow. In which the Streamline method is something that saves time, but only if quality is not one of the main considerations. Mmmmm. This is not really an answer you want, is it? The stuff I use from Streamline is just a starting point. It is just a tool. And I do understand why there will not be an update. Ever. I regret it. But it is reality as we know it. Without the borders we boldy cross. Or whatever. No need to get captain Picard in this particular subject, I think.


Hoofdcommissaris ( ) posted Sun, 26 January 2003 at 5:35 PM

Jeez. What a lot of words... Sorry for that. I found out, during some years, Streamline is one of the tools of the trade. Just a tool. It actually never Hreally does miracles. It just traces. It traces stuff that already is there. In the right resolution. Like a hammer. One needs it. But one can not brag much about it. Adobe is not doing much PR on the thing lately... It still saved my bum a couple of times though...


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.