Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/messages.ez?ForumID=12418&Form.ShowMessage=1708428

Speaking of moved posts... Am I going crazy or did I just see a post with a penis-prop for the Anime doll? I reloaded the page and... poof?! Was there anything wrong with it?

Missing post referred to an image which is currently under review. It will be back if an admin approves it.

Yes, you did. Shoshanna's getting a bit trigger happy when it comes to moving anything involving me. Check the merchant forum. I posted about it there and was told by ClintH to take it up with admins. Shoshanna forwarded it, she says, to Spike. That was almost a week ago, I've heard nothing. Rather than have me delete the image, she moved my entire post to a forum where I can't even access it to get the text portion. The image was found perfectly fine by ClintH, but he defaulted to Spike's opinion, since he runs the free area, and rather than let an image which does NOT show a preteen sit in the Poser forum and have her name damaged for good reason, she chose to remove it. And yes, I'm being bitchy. I'm trying to do something for my friends and customers and I keep getting told I'm making pedophillic images when ALL the image has is a damn PENIS in it.

Yeah, I can understand that. It's kind of hard (no pun) to display a groinal attachment for what looks like a pre-teen boy and not violate the anti-pedophile clause. Maybe it would be better to post it at Renderotica. No, wait - Renderotica has the anti-pedophile clause, too.

It wasn't a pedophillic character, for starters. No one except Renderosity staff has said it was. When an image is a penis and a bit of hip/leg, how can it be pedophillic, since you can see nothing of the character involved? And I don't WANT it at Renderotica, because my customers shouldn't have to go to another site to get something a character should already have attatched!

It involved adding a penis prop to a female figure and renderosity seems to have this thing about that. "Officially" they deny such a bias, but images of girls with penises almost invariably get deleted. Also, apparently any figure that lacks pubic hair is considered a child. Posette and dork in their default forms don't have pubic hair, so I guess we won't be allowed to post node images of them soon...

Hmm there are LOADS of texturs for Vickie with her pubic area totally bald or with very very little hair. But of course, Vickie usually has those huge boobies so noone can be in doubt that she's of legal age ....... And Khrys' figure isn't a female (or a shemale) any more than V3Male is. Noone has as far as I know objected to the fact that THAT figure needs a prop to be complete.

Quote from the TOS. "No depictions of young humanoid characters/children giving the appearance of being under the age of 18 where genitals are displayed and/or in erotic, seductive, provocative poses or context. Since age is difficult to identify with 3D images, this will be at the discretion of the Renderosity team. If your characters genitals are on show and it looks under 18, the image will not remain on this site. If it was posted before the TOS was updated, you will be contacted to either remove the image or rework it so that it complies with the TOS. Please also note "No character attacks, which could be interpreted as defamation of character, slander, and libelous" No member of Renderosity Staff has accused Khrys of being a pedophile. As this has nothing to do with the original purpose of this post, I am locking this thread. Shoshanna Renderosity Moderator.