Forum Moderators: wheatpenny Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon
Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 26 6:56 am)
Might be similar - I bought a Sigma 400mm lens (a few years ago) for fairly cheap. I found that the lens (optics) were more than acceptable - impressive, I might say (even though the lens was a painfully slow 5.6 - but I harly ever shoot ANY lens wide open anyway.) The problem came about six months later - when the cheap lens collar (made of a lightweight plastic) simply gave out (cracked completely in half) - so this otherwise decent lens has been sitting in a drawer for the past eight years. For the most part, the manufacturing of lenses today is so computer CNC controlled that excellent optics are fairly easy to achieve - but the "wrapper" that the lens is presented in can make all the difference in the world. Perfect optics in a plastic case that tends to swell and shrink with the slightest temperature change (especially with a long lens), will drastically alter the performance of the lens. there's no replacing a "solid-feeling" lens. I have no experience with the lens you're asking about - it may be a wonderful lens (but $200? - i would have to be cautious) if at all possible, get ahold of one and test shoot it in several environments, and then judge for yourself. Just my $3.89 worth (I've decided to charge a bit more!) Wolf
I have the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM and I have had no problems with it. I did read what some others were saying about sigma lenses being a little soft around the edges especially when zoomed. Over here in the UK my lens retails at 189 but well worth the money, ideally I would have liked to buy the Image Stabalised version. I also use a canon 300d
Attached Link: http://www.adorama.com/skudooraid003925.tpl?sku=SG70300SEOS;cfA3F3B2C5=bmVuMjcyMjpnb29keWVhcl9lbWVh
These seem to have some in stock at $209Yeah i've been to adorama, the only thing holding me back is it says it's the super, not super 2. And the only way I know how to tell them apart is by a red stripe around the lense, which I can't see in the picture they provide. And supposedly the super 1 has minor problems which the super 2 fixed. Anyone know another way to tell the 2 versions apart?? Thanks for the info guys. I'm gonna check out the cannon 75-300.
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
After searching, and waiting for weeks now for the Sigma 70-300 Macro Zoom Super 2, and either finding them for extremely high prices, or out of stock, i've decided maybe I can buy a different lense... I've actually seen pictures taken with the sigma which is the main reason I wanted it, pluss it had good reviews from what I found... But since I apparently can't get it, I was wondering if anyone has had experience with a similiar lense, in the same price range($200.00)? Canon Digital Rebel