Wed, Dec 4, 8:47 PM CST

Renderosity Forums / Photography



Welcome to the Photography Forum

Forum Moderators: wheatpenny Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon

Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 26 6:56 am)



Subject: Lens Recommendations


Orestes ( ) posted Wed, 20 April 2005 at 1:20 PM · edited Tue, 03 December 2024 at 6:18 AM

Hey everyone :), I'd just like to know what your recommendations are for lens taking very close up shots. What I would like to do is take shots for use as textures in 3D applications such as Bryce. Also, I've found in that shots I have taken, the outermost edges are out of focus. My camera is the new Canon Eos XT Digital, so I'm sure the problem is most likely me lol. Any advice would be great. :) -Dave


Be nice, or I shalt smite thee!
  [ My Gallery ] [ My Freestuff ] [My DAZ Store] [ Homepage: www.orestesgraphics.com ]


danob ( ) posted Wed, 20 April 2005 at 2:08 PM

If you mean the new 350D with its EFS mount I would think the EFS Macro would be an ideal choice lighter and smaller in weight and designed to suit this cameras sensor if costs are a consideration then look at Macro lens by Sigma and Tamron

Danny O'Byrne  http://www.digitalartzone.co.uk/

"All the technique in the world doesn't compensate for the inability to notice" Eliott Erwitt


LostPatrol ( ) posted Wed, 20 April 2005 at 3:21 PM

IMO the Canon 100mm f2.8 macro is superb. If you are taking your shots straight on then the DOF wont be too much of an issue, but if there is any depth to the shot than a macro lens may not be your best option. Even with a macro lens stopped down to f32 there may be a little blurring at the edges, depending on the angle and depth of the subject. A wider lens will offer a much deeper DOF.

The Truth is Out There


danob ( ) posted Wed, 20 April 2005 at 4:29 PM

I would agree with Simon very much here as I own the 100mm USM myself the 65mm EFS has less of a telephoto effect and having been designed for the 1.6 sized sensor in my view is a bit sharper than expected at the edges .. The angle of view that Simon mentions is a key issue when perhaps the wider 50mm macro may also be worth considering and a even more cost effective solution

Danny O'Byrne  http://www.digitalartzone.co.uk/

"All the technique in the world doesn't compensate for the inability to notice" Eliott Erwitt


DJB ( ) posted Wed, 20 April 2005 at 10:49 PM

I have donequite a few shots for Bryce textures and never had the need for a macro.Depends though what you have in mind for textures. Maybe you can clarify that.

"The happiness of a man in this life does not consist in the absence but in the mastery of his passions."



Orestes ( ) posted Thu, 21 April 2005 at 10:55 PM

You've been a great help, Thanks!


Be nice, or I shalt smite thee!
  [ My Gallery ] [ My Freestuff ] [My DAZ Store] [ Homepage: www.orestesgraphics.com ]


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.