Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom
Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Jan 03 1:41 pm)
Have you tried increasing the texture size to match the size of the maps? Sometimes that can help with the resolution problems. I agree that the lowest you can go with minimum shading is the best. It just takes a lot longer to render if you go all the way down. Are your noise and spots from the texture or by bump mapping?
You can have the max texture setting but it won't adress these issues if your Min SHade Rate is high.
Noise and spots are node procedurals. Maps wouldn't behave quite the same way as that they are image maps.
Message edited on: 04/29/2005 22:05
-Anton, creator of Apollo Maximus
"Conviction without truth is denial; Denial in the
face of truth is concealment."
It's under general preferences. The same as in previous versions of Poser.
Only in previous versions of Poser, your scale didn't affect materials. Whether you were you using feet or inches or meters or whatever, bumps were the same. Now, bumps are real-world scale, and maybe that's true of other material room settings, too. (Setting the Poser 6 scale to inches makes the bump settings from P4/5 about right, FWIW.)
PBM - also the P6 noise node has 2 nodes - the "original" and the "improved" - so if you use improved - it will be different from the P5 noise node. byAnton - from what I can tell (based on lots of renders using node based skin noise), a full body render at 900x900 needs a Min Shading rate at about 0.5 (any less give no noticeable improvement). For a head portrait at the same dimensions, 0.2 seems to be the right mark. 0.0 Min Shading Rate is required if you do larger renders (2000x2000).
Creator of PoserPhysics
Creator
of OctaneRender
for Poser
Blog
Facebook
Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=921068&Start=1&Artist=PapaBlueMarlin&ByArtist=Yes
Paul, I'm aware of the different settings on the nodes. It hasn't made much of a difference. Attached is a P5 render using spot bump mapping. When I rendered in P6, the spots were too strong. I tried to reduce the strength of the effect, but it still didn't look the same. Incidently, this is a technique I learned from Cath while trying to understand translucence in P5. I'll have to render it again using inches instead of PNU. I'm just so use to using PNU that I can't see a reason for using for future work though...I don't have that BorgQueen anymore. I unistalled everything prior to V2 years ago. I just woke up am will come back and read more when I wake up and have coffee)yawnnnnn!stretch!!!!) Everything is still fuzzy. Brain is still booting.
-Anton, creator of Apollo Maximus
"Conviction without truth is denial; Denial in the
face of truth is concealment."
Attached Link: http://fnproductions.net/graphics/tutorials/poser6/
Anton - are you aware that (according to the information in Tirjasdyn's linked FAQ) if the shading rate setting (which every Poser actor has in it's parameters window) is higher than whatever minimum that you might have set in Firefly, then it will override your Firefly setting? Firefly will use the highest of the two values.I've been studying Renderman lately. According to Stewer (in a post from RDNA I believe) says there's several similarities with P5/P6 material room and Renderman's shader systems. In my own research so far, the Firefly renderer APPEARS to mimic Renderman's capabilities in an, albeit "budget" interpretation. An interesting tidbit in the book I'm reading (Renderman For Beginners, published 2005) says that it's faster when: (a) texture maps are square (the Daz maps I have are rectangular; you can "square" them in Photoshop with no apparent effect since upper left corner is 0,0 and lower right corner is 1,1 and the UV values are adjusted to fit properly - don't forget to use pixel values that are powers of 2 - 256x256, 512x512, etc.) (b) Minimum Shading Rate is a higher value (for drafts). I would tend to agree with face_off, in that you may notice little difference when using a shading rate less than 0.5, but I am in the early phases of running the Firefly renderer through its paces. I imagine that setting Min Shade Rate to zero would take forever, especially if you're using reflection / refraction et al. (c) Using stochastic sampling, which of course Poser does not offer. I have learned a great deal about post filters to soften / sharpen images. I particularly like using Gaussian blur at 2x2 pixel samples - looks more like film. Now what does this have to do with your spot node problem? Absolutely nothing. I just love the sound of my own voice and the fact that Poser is so deep that there is always something new to learn.
A shading rate less than 0.5 may make little difference with skin, but it can make a HUGE difference with hair. Several of Koz's styles, and many DAZ hair textures, look very noisy/staticky with the shading rate at 0.5. Lower it to 0.02-0.05, and they look fantastic. Like completely different textures.
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
-Anton, creator of Apollo Maximus
"Conviction without truth is denial; Denial in the face of truth is concealment."
Over 100,000 Downloads....