Forum Moderators: wheatpenny, Wolfenshire
Writers F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Jan 07 3:10 am)
My gut says it's a bad idea to include the pictures, no matter how good they are. Without pictures you have to capture the imagination of the editor only once. With pictures you have to capture the imagination of the editor twice: once with the words, and again with the images - for their vision may not necessarily be your visual. If they accept your manuscript then, as mamabobbijo suggests, might be the time to propose the graphics too.
~jon
~jon
My Blog - Mad
Utopia Writing in a new era.
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
This was my plan until I found a few books such as "The First Five Pages" by Noah Lukeman suggest against the idea of including pictures. The few books I saw on this say that publishers prefer to use their own illustrators.
What I am wondering is if anyone has actually tried to submit a manuscript with their own pictures or if anyone knows of some authors who have done so and still acheived an accepted manuscript.
Attached to this note is a sample of one of the many pictures I have created for my story. I think the quality is good but that may be irrelevant if publishers simply reject such works.