Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom
Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 28 11:20 am)
Quote - Oh dear - here I've been doing this all wrong. There IS a link to a webpage in case you can't actually see the graphics in the email. You can see the webpage here:
dr.bluehornet.com/hostedemail/email.htm
Let me know if this works for you.
It indeed worked-they are reeling me in $124.99 poorer, and I'll be using PP2010, which I didn't think I'd be able to afford. :biggrin:
Many Thanx!! :wub:
My counterpart tried it and got a 40% off coupon; Since I got 50%, we don't need the 40%, and according to the rules they can be given away, so if anyone wants it, drop me a PM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Wisdom of bagginsbill:
"Oh - the manual says that? I have never read the manual - this must be why."My take on this version (PP2010) so far has been quite positive. It is far more stable than Poser 8, and will soon be replacing Poser 7 as my default Poser app, as soon as I have VSS and Matmatic and all those other necessities of Poser life installed.
I've removed Poser 6 permanently, as well as Silo (should have done that ages ago) and some other space hogs so PoserPro has a nice clean home to live in.
(Might even removed Elements 8 now that I have CS 3, but it's really not that big and there is still so much to learn in that fantastic programme).
Thank goodness for that half-off sale: I never would have been able to swing $249 for a sidegrade (mind you, I can see how it would have been worth it).
As far as how it runs: reasonably well, not unlike Poser 8, just more stable.
Monterey/Mint21.x/Win10 - Blender3.x - PP11.3(cm) - Musescore3.6.2
Wir sind gewohnt, daß die Menschen verhöhnen was sie nicht verstehen
[it is clear that humans have contempt for that which they do not understand]
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Yep, that wiki article shows exactly that the limit is not a 32 bit address space limit but a licencing limit - the 32 bit version of Win2003 supports 4/8/64/128 GB RAM depending on the licence, they are the same codebase.
You can - article on Ars Technica on removing the limit from 32 bit versions of Vista/Win 7.
http://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=49358