Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom
Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 02 2:25 pm)
I use both with PP2012, along with D3D's new one, and sometimes even Poser's built in library manager.
Version 2.5 seems a little slow on displaying directories, but maybe that's because I haven't been through all of them yet. It has the ability to load partial poses, which is handy.
Version 2 seems a bit more intuitive with saving and has the ability to save a render as the thumbnail.
These are just off the top of my head, I'd have to think a while to make a list.
Honestly, I use the D3D library most of the time, but all have certain features different from the others.
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Hello.
I am looking at these two products after a friend recommended them to me. One is $20 while the other is $25. I have gone over them at RDNA, and while they seem very similar to me, could anyone please go over the differences and which one is preferable for the chore of Library Manager. They both look fabulous. So what does the $25 package do that the $20 does not. Or are they essentially the same. I use PP2012.
Thanks.
R