Panasonic vs Canon by PeeWee05

Photography • Science/Medical • posted on Jun 01, 2006

Open full image in new tab Zoom on image

Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.

Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.

Description

So I know there isn't really any comparision between a HECC and a DSLR... But I thought you guys might like to see, I original file size apon creation was 2MB but that was obviously too big... I shot the last two sections with the Sigma 70 - 300 lens in Macro mode (it's more of a close up than true macro). And all shots were done on Macro Mode with both cameras, which sets all of the features for you including shutter, AP, flash, WB, ISO and file quality (which was fine/excellent). Hope to here some WOW - "now I want a DSLR" s. I mainly whated to show what I got for the upgrade... The only thing the Pana was better for was weight, less colour vigging/noise and a truer sense of white. The Canon gives off more of a warmer tone... But with the digital barkroom anything can be fixed. Well almost anything. Tx to all for the click on the lioness yesterday and the wonderful comments!

Comments (15)

gwfa

1:43AM | Thu, 01 June 2006

that are 2 different classes, hardly to compare...

)

TheWarlock

1:49AM | Thu, 01 June 2006

talk abt making me color blind with the background haha... ja ja.. tough to find a granular comparison

)

PeeWee05

1:58AM | Thu, 01 June 2006

I know the comp isn't fair but it more of a look what I upgraded to...

)

kimariehere

2:27AM | Thu, 01 June 2006

Wonderful to see the diferances i am currently looking into a canon 20 d right now... I was going to go with nikon but think canon is better for me... thanks for sharing the results interesting!

)

Luka_30

2:47AM | Thu, 01 June 2006

Very interesting comparison!

)

mizoli

3:38AM | Thu, 01 June 2006

Canon.. to my mind :-) Very nice presentation!

Valerie-Ducom

3:55AM | Thu, 01 June 2006

very interessante idea of comparaison.. good idea... Good day and kiss ;)

)

nikolais

5:32AM | Thu, 01 June 2006

Thanks for a most valuable info. Thinking of buying a camer instead of my dead Nikon Coolpix 5700. Canon sounds a good alternative.

Larry-L

8:20AM | Thu, 01 June 2006

http://www.dpreview.com/ also has very comprehensive reviews on both these, which influenced my decision to get the Canon.

)

PeeWee05

8:38AM | Thu, 01 June 2006

Me too...

glennn23

11:57AM | Thu, 01 June 2006

Cool idea! Nice that you can see that you have most definitely made a good buying decision. I did my research on 'Stevesdigicams' (something like that) and he has a great list of the five or six cams that are best in each class from consumer point and click to super pro... it helped me alot - especially since I knew I could not afford the best but knew that I was getting the best for the class I could afford... Nice work +++

)

busi2ness

4:14PM | Thu, 01 June 2006

I am also thinking of buying a new camera, but what an emotional subject! I wish I could afford the Hasselblad H2D-39. Interesting comparisons Vera.

)

jocko500

9:49PM | Thu, 01 June 2006

I like to buy a new camera but no money for one. this is super looking images

)

Chaos911

12:00PM | Sun, 04 June 2006

wow, realy fantastic, super!!!

)

Richardphotos

7:58PM | Thu, 08 June 2006

I had a Kodak 3.2 pixel camera before and I thought it had half decent pics. then I bought the Fuji 12million pixel and I gave the Kodak away. the Fuji has a fixed lenses also but the quality is leaps and bounds over the kodak. my canon rebel xt only produces 8 million pixels but has a larger sensor than the fuji. in regular shooting the Canon beats the Fuji but for macros of stuff that is moving the fuji is superior. excellent collage and congrats on the new camera