Tue, Nov 5, 4:29 AM CST

Load of Crap

Poser Animals posted on Oct 22, 2006
Open full image in new tab Zoom on image
Close

Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.


Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.

Description


my image titled "Not so Hard" was removed because it Violated terms of service regarding sexual content in images and it is in violation of the Child Nudity Guidelines..I think this is Load of Crap.I have a family and daughters and i think i know what crosses the line and this image did not ..and saying it did is just short of calling me a pervert..and invisioning it as something other than cute really sheds a bad light on the moderators that had to have a meeting to say this breaks the rules...they are the ones that twisted it into something perverted not me... This is my second warning...so being here soon may not even be a choice......Again its just a load of crap...!I have lost all inspiration.

Comments (40)


)

RGUS

11:37PM | Sun, 22 October 2006

Oh so bloody agreed.... man it's hard around here.... what to do... what to do????

)

TheAnimaGemini

11:53PM | Sun, 22 October 2006

F....Bill. I dont know what they think here. But i know something for sure. Here are a lot of member who just walk through the galleries just for to Report it. I am really tired of this shit here. I am sure a lot of members here and the moderators are dont know what art even is. They think to put Aiko in some nice outfit whith wingsis enough. But Art is something special. I have seen at DAZ a disskusson about Nudity in Art. And a lot of people said there nudity is just ugly and not really Art.LOL Sh.... If they would take a look to the images from all the famos old masters, they would see a big diffrent. Gaah Did you have the nudity flag on? Your Elefants are nacked. Tongue Out 9Surrender 2

)

vaggabondd

11:59PM | Sun, 22 October 2006

some people just don't get it. art is from the soul. keep the faith and the great work. Randy

)

romanceworks

12:10AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

I don't know, Bill, these elephants look awfully naked and really young to me. Geeze. Most really talented artists that have any spunk get discouraged and/or put down from time to time. I hope you'll find a way to let the experience make you even better ... so don't lose faith or inspiration. CC

)

DRAKELOT

12:25AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Fantastic Bill !!! What else is new ... Well, keep up the fantastic work and fascinating art ... !

)

Starlift

12:42AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

It is curious that Renderosity makes money selling sexy little outfits for Aiko and then penalizes artists for using them. Aiko is Japanesse, and, I think most people agree that in general, Japanesse women have younger looking faces. So is Renderosity discriminating against Japanesse women? Only Vicky can be shown in sexy outfits and situations? Hummmm...

)

Primal

12:45AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Load of crap!

)

frankiemas

1:03AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Wow excellent choice of animals, so sorry that your image was censored Bill!!! I hope you regain your inspiration, cause it is definitely wonderful seeing your artwork :) Sorry I did not see your last artwork :( Those Repu... I mean elephants look nasty and the effects are wonderful!!! Keep your cool Bill and keep pumping that excellent artwork of yours. Here at Rosity, they should remove that report button, I believe a lot of people are getting their kicks watching people's artwork get removed. I definitely agree with you, it is a load of crap ^^ Hugsss Frankie ^^

)

brycek

1:49AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Your artwork is fantastic Bill..keep your chin up high and I agree about the load of C!!

)

Faery_Light

2:09AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Bill, I don't understand if it was an Aiko image how any nudity is a TOS. This was discussed on Thu, Sep 21, 2006 8:59 am in the Vendor Support forum and Debbie said Aiko is an anime figure, not a child in answer to the question, "isn't Aiko a child". I think I missed seeing that image so I don't know what may or may not have been wrong. Ahhh well, I'm always confused. :)

)

Surama

2:49AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Fantastic image again!

)

Petra-S

2:51AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Wonderful creation!

)

Syltermermaid

4:41AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

I can only agree with Frankie, about people who get her kicks if other peoples images get removed!!! It is a shame, but I thought already when I saw your image, that she had not enough polygones!!! I have also to be careful have also already one report on my board for saying what I thought about someone who reported someone! So better I keep my mouth shut!!! Sorry for what was happen, but think about this wonderful image you had at the first place in the "Hall of fame" here and may be that inspires you again!!!! You do so wonderful art!!!! I love even your angry elefants!!!!LOL Hugs Ute

)

jjean21

5:46AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

This is a fantastic way to show your feelings about the censorship around here...and I agree with you completely....this is the place that says you have to diaper a baby even in the arms of its Mother....puhleez!!!

)

B_PEACOCK

6:45AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

You know how I feel Bill . I was just talking to someone about this same thing yesterrday . I will IM you when I get a chance ;)

)

mlevans

7:58AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Ohhhhhh....Republicans....imagine that (with sincere apologies to all my Reublican friends who truly are good people). I believe I saw the image in question; it was hardly what anyone could legitimately call "perverse".

)

Artzy

8:19AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Renderosity Is Not The Place It Once Was...

)

Forevernyt

8:41AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

I think it's time Rosity did an overhaul of it's decision making board. What fools.

Shakti27

9:14AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

That narc button was never a good idea in the first place - puts the power in the hands of too much subjectiveness rolls eyes and shakes ones head People read too dang much of their own psychosis into things and then bam you get in trouble. HUGE HUGS sry that happened to you my friend - I loved that pic and this one too - you always render elephants so well and this one is no exception :)

)

sumdumgi

9:59AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

..............................................................................!!!

)

MagikUnicorn

10:10AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Mum I think I understand...something happen to me too couple years ago (here) and I still have in my mind! But I think maybe some mod are jealous of your MASTER WORK ;-) KEEP YOU STRONG MY MASTER :) REGARDS MAGIK

)

Sekadhar

10:28AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Simply - I love it and it goes right to my favorites!!! Elephants are my very dear animal (I have no idea why?!)! Superb!!!

kfox

11:16AM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Ah, Bill, that image seemed to be a gauntlet thrown from the edge of the sword you were walking on to me! Or perhaps it was the commentary the nay sayers found perverted - the thought that anyone would enjoy something other than thy standard missionary sex? One question though - how the heck did those elephants get in that building? LOL!

)

DonaKuka

12:27PM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Oh no, not again!!! So sorry to ear that! I don't even know what to say!!! But in oposite of those fantastic elephants of yours that seem so angry while aprisionated into that building, please don't let anyone aprisionate your feelings and the way you expresse them in your art!!!

)

jwiest

2:51PM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Sure didn't look like it violated TOS to me. rolls eyes I think you've got a very valid complaint. That's just totally F'd up.

)

lwperkins

3:39PM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Feel for you--I had one pulled because she "looked young"--the mods saw a second render that I did from a slightly different angle and said that one would have been ok(?!) Mind, you, she had visible pubic hair. She was carrying a jar in the desert (that was covering her breasts), and wasn't even a sexy image IMO. Anyway, it's not like I'm bitter or anything;-)

)

mejed

5:16PM | Mon, 23 October 2006

I saw it, and it didnt violate the TOS. As long as the powers that be are in powere and certain Mods are let in place, shell always get what she wants. I think Renderosity has begun its death thros as being the bigest and a best. Its not "all about the artist" anymore.

)

airbrushr

5:18PM | Mon, 23 October 2006

Im not sure I saw your render in question, but from what I've seen of your art, I'm sure it was totally OK by "OUR" standards. The trouble with Aiko, is you can render her...small tits, no no, make em big, its OK, hairless pubic area, too young, a curly bush, she's old enough. Rough decision. Anyway, keep up your spirits and keep em coming bud, love your work. Oh yea, great elephant scene.

)

RubyT

6:20PM | Mon, 23 October 2006

NOT AGAIN! DAMMIT!! THIS IS GETTING REIDULUOUS!! THE MODS NEED TO GO TO REHAB!!!!! PUT DOWN THE BONG, BACK AWAY FROM THE CRACK. This is so unjust!!! I was wondering what happened to that image, I went to go look at it as I learn and get inspiration from artists such as yourself!! Bill, I hope you stay and I keep thilking there has to be a higher authority to meet with over this!!!! Who runs this joint??? How do we get meetings with them?? Those would be my questions. Someone needs to train those Mods as to what is and what is not allowed especially when these venders here sell these things and they themselves call them adult!!! You even said on that image that she was 22 if I recall correctly!! Perhaps meeting with the vendors might help!!! grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!

)

Dolphins-Dream

8:01PM | Mon, 23 October 2006

I wonder when the term "Artistic Nudity" has become the equivilent of "Pornography" Sigh .. I wonder if Boris Vallejo was ever calle don the carpet for "Pornographic art"... I think not! :) For what it's worth Bill, I enjoy your art. I think people should simply choose not to look at an image if they don't like it or moreso don't UNDERSTAND it :)

  • 1
  • 2

3 329 0

01
Days
:
19
Hrs
:
30
Mins
:
49
Secs
Premier Release Product
Horror lighting effects
2D Graphics
Sale Item
$10.00 USD 40% Off
$6.00 USD

Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.